Case law

Gomez v. Kamper Investments, LLC (In Re Gomez)

388 B.R. 279 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Apr 3, 2008

In re Brown, 282 B.R. 880, 882-83 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.2002). … In Brown , after examining the legislative history of § 1322 the Court noted that “[ujnder Arkansas law, a judicial foreclosure sale is complete upon confirmation of the sale by the court.” Id. (citing Dellinger v.

In Re Hanson

282 B.R. 240 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · Jul 25, 2002

BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. … Fish Market Nominee Corp. v. Pelofsky, 72 F.3d 4 (1st Cir.1995); In re Weston, 101 B.R. 202 (Bankr.E.D.Cal.1989), aff'd 123 B.R. 466 (9th Cir.

Galerie Des Monnaies of Geneva, Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank, A.G., New York Branch (In Re Galerie Des Monnaies of Geneva, Ltd.)

55 B.R. 253 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 22, 1985

Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 , 101 S.Ct. 411, 414-15 , 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980); Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 326 , 99 S.Ct. 645, 649 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); Brown v. … Davis v. Wakelee, 156 U.S. 680, 689 , 15 S.Ct. 555, 558 , 39 L.Ed. 578 (1895); Allen v. Zurich Insurance Co., 667 F.2d 1162, 1166-67 (4th Cir.1982); Scarano v. Central R.

In Re P.J. Keating Co.

168 B.R. 464 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 17, 1994

to electing the rest of the board. … Co. v. Monnier Bros.

In Re Graven

101 B.R. 109 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · May 23, 1989

Graven executed a bill of sale to Graven Auction Company, Inc. covering 169 head of Holstein and Brown Swiss dairy cattle, 5 motor vehicles, 4 tractors, and all the equipment that comprised their dairy operation. … See Jennings v. Suggs, 180 Ga. 141 , 178 S.E. 282 (1935), Ewing v. Union Central Bank, 254 Ky. 623 , 72 S.W.2d 4 (1934). If such an interpretation is permissible, then this is a ease where it is appropriate.

Harrell v. Sharp (In Re Harrell)

23 B.R. 423 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Sep 30, 1982

This jurisdiction may change on October 4, 1982 in accordance with the recent decision of Northern Pipeline Construction Company v. … In the instant case, Scott Harrell attends Drake University with an annual cost of approximately $9,678.00 for tuition, room and board. (See Scott Harrell’s deposition at pp. 45 and 47.)

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Moll Industries, Inc. v. Highland Capital Management L.P. (In Re Moll Industries, Inc.)

454 B.R. 574 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Aug 3, 2011

Trevino v. … Trust v.

Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)

174 B.R. 557 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 1994

Del-vin Riesenhuber, voted to remove Kelley from PDRA’s Board of Directors. Pelican took over the Board, and Martin became PDRA’s Chief Operating Officer. … See, e.g., Roco, 701 F.2d at 981-84 ; Browning v. Williams (In re Silver Wheel Freightlines, Inc.), 64 B.R. 563, 566-68 (Bankr.D.Or.1986); Pirrone v.

Gordon v. Rogich (In re Alpha Protective Services, Inc.)

570 B.R. 888 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · Apr 24, 2017

In Gordon v. … In Kelley v.

Helena Chemical Company v. Hood

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · Jun 1, 2022

Hudson v. … Brown v. Chesnut (In re Chesnut), 422 F.3d 298, 301 (5th Cir. 2005).

Nahman v. Jacks (In Re Jacks)

243 B.R. 385 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Dec 29, 1999

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 133-138 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2211-13 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). Issue preclusion applies only to issues that were actually litigated. … Brown, 442 U.S. at 130-31 , 99 S.Ct. at 2209 . In this case, Jacks must prevail on the fraud claim under § 523(a)(2).

Williford v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education (In Re Williford)

300 B.R. 70 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 8, 2003

See United States v. Brown (In re Brown), 18 B.R. 219, 222 (Bankr.D.Kan.1982), cited with approval in Hatfield v. William D. Ford Fed. … The next case, Ritchie v. Northwest Educ. Loan Ass’n.

In Re Smith

269 B.R. 629 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · Oct 29, 2001

See, e.g., Winter v. … v.

In re Monteleone

553 B.R. 288 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 2016

In re Brown, 75 B.R. 1009, 1012 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987) (citing In re Rouse, 48 B.R. 236, 240-41 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1985)). … Mining and Mineral Co. v. Fox-Rothschild, LLP, 615 F.3d 159, 166 (3d Cir.2010) (setting forth test to determine when Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies); Rushmore Loan Mgmt. Servs., LLC v.

Galaxy Associates v. Sheffield Corp. (In re Galaxy Associates)

114 B.R. 11 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · May 14, 1990

Armstrong v. McAlpin, 625 F.2d 433, 444 (2d Cir.1980), vacated, 449 U.S. 1106 , 101 S.Ct. 911 , 66 L.Ed.2d 835 (1981). As the court in Lamborn v. … Board of Ed. v. Nyquist, 590 F.2d 1241 , 1246 (2d Cir.1979); United States Football League v. National Football League, 605 F.Supp. 1448, 1452 (S.D.N.Y.1985).

Hoffer v. American Education Services (In Re Hoffer)

383 B.R. 78 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 20, 2008

Nat’l Rifle Ass’n of Am. v. Magaw, 132 F.3d 272, 284 (6th Cir.1997) (citations omitted). … See also Brown v.

In re Southern Humboldt Community Healthcare District

254 B.R. 758 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Oct 9, 2000

On March 23, 1998, the District’s board of directors authorized the District to borrow $663,824.00 from the Bank for the purpose of paying off the line of credit and the overdrafts and keeping the District operating until … V. Conclusion The validity of the Bank’s claim is not properly before the court.

In Re ICS Cybernetics, Inc.

97 B.R. 736 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · Jan 9, 1989

See Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir. 1941); Futuronics Corp. v. … neglect has been recognized as a very narrow exception to the “per se” rule, there is no indication that such neglect existed herein See In re Amherst Mister Anthony’s Ltd., 63 B.R. 292, 294 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1986); In re Brown

Our Alchemy, LLC - Adversary Proceeding

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Sep 16, 2019

In the corporate context, Kahn v. … In Kahn v. Lynch, the controller was so brazen as to tell the board “you must listen to us” and threatened to take full control of the company if the board did not meet their demands. Id. at 1114.

In Re Nepsco, Inc.

36 B.R. 25 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Dec 14, 1983

See Coyne-Delany Co., Inc. v. Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois, 616 F.2d 341, 342-43 (7th Cir.1980). In Perkins v. … Bowman v.