Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,439 results
0.78s
389 B.R. 146 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · Apr 10, 2008
Gur-rola believed his bankruptcy immunized him from enforcement of the judgment, then he should” obtain an order from the bankruptcy court to that effect. … a factual record, not only of their damages and costs, but also sufficient to establish that Northwest Collectors and Sandefur violated the discharge injunction under § 524(a)(2).
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTerry W. Dedmon and Khristie Rae Gable
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownClint J. Jones and Pamela S. Jones
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownShuman v. Kashkashian (In Re Shuman)
277 B.R. 638 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2001
“The burden of establishing the requisite jurisdictional facts rests on the plaintiff as the party alleging their existence.” Lucas v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., 666 F.2d at 805 ; accord Walnut Associates v. … In this Court’s opinion, this adversary proceeding does not qualify as “related to” this bankruptcy case and this Court is without jurisdiction to hear the claims for relief asserted in the complaint.
Cited 25 timesPublishedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 22, 2022
Although mutual agreement “is most clearly evidenced by the terms of a signed written agreement ... such a signed writing is not essential to the formation of the contract. … Upon review of the Second Amended Complaint, it clearly corresponds only to the DC Action and does not purport to modify the Section 523 Complaint.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJamie L. Brucker and Angela Jane Brucker
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownThomas Paul Schnack and Christy Kaye Schnack
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcCormack Terminal Co. v. F.A. Potts & Co. (In Re F.A. Potts & Co.)
42 B.R. 712 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1984
Instead, it expressly and clearly required that the marine services charges be offset against the paragraph 6(a) and (b) payments on a less than annual basis. … Thus, the meaning of language cannot be distorted to establish the ambiguity.”
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJeffrey S. Thulin and Julie Bayles Thulin
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknownShaune K. Scruggs and Micah T. Scruggs
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · Oct 30, 2020
In Geraci, the court had established a presumptively reasonable fee for no asset consumer bankruptcy cases. Id. at 316. … The Court questioned why no waiver of the filing fee filing fee was submitted even though Debtors clearly qualified.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna