Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

1.73s

  • Diamant v. Sheldon L. Pollack Corp.

    216 B.R. 589 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · May 4, 1995

    Industrial Clearinghouse, Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Division of Emerson Electric Co., 953 F.2d 1004, 1008 (5th Cir.1992); See also United States v. … United States v. Femon, 640 F.2d 609, 613 (5th Cir.1981).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Roeder v. Lockwood (In Re Lockwood Auto Group, Inc.)

    428 B.R. 629 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2010

    Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 150 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). … See, e.g., USX Corp. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • RSJ Construction Corp. v. C. H. Stuart, Inc. (In Re C. H. Stuart, Inc.)

    17 B.R. 400 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · Feb 11, 1982

    Stuart’s board of directors authorized capital expenditures of $5,450,000 for the building and furnishing of the new Artcraft complex. The construction budget for the RSJ contract was set at $3,600,000. … Monroe Savings Bank v. First National Bank of Waterloo, 50 A.D.2d 314 , 377 N.Y.S.2d 827 (4th Dept 1976).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Atamian Manufacturing Corp. v. Citizens Trust Co. (In Re E.A. Adams, Inc.)

    29 B.R. 224 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · May 20, 1983

    [is] not inconsistent with the holding of Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.” Rule 53(G), United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island. … Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board (In re Braniff Airways, Inc.), 27 B.R. 231 , 10 B.C.D. 30 (N.D.Tex.1983) aff’d, 700 F.2d 214 (5th Cir.1983). 4 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rose v. U.S. Dept. of Education (In Re Rose)

    214 B.R. 372 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 10, 1997

    Likewise, MSLP appears to be a state agency administered through the Missouri Coordinating Board for Higher Education under Missouri statute. See §§ 173.005, et seq., Mo.Rev.Stat. (1994). … Accord Dept. of Transp. & Dev. v. PNL Asset Mgmt. Co.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Henderson v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Simmons)

    510 B.R. 76 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · Apr 24, 2014

    Brown and Mary Grace Brown to Mary Allison Brown Simmons, one of the debtors in this case. The 1992 Deed was recorded at Book 4046, Page 205 in the land records of Hinds County, Jackson, Mississippi. … Simmons and Mary Allison Brown Simmons (Debtors) executed a Deed of Trust (2003 Deed of Trust) in favor of Full Spectrum Lending, Inc.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Johns-Manville Corp.

    36 B.R. 727 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 23, 1984

    See, e.g., City of Manchester v. National Gypsum Company, et al., Civ. Ac. 83-143-L (D.N. H.); Board of Trustees, Gulfport Municipal School District v. National Gypsum Company, et al., Civ. Ac. … .); County of Loudon v. United States Gypsum, et al., Civ. Ac. 3-83-329 (E.D.Tenn.); Montgomery County Board of Education v. W.R. Grace, et al., Civ.Ac. 83V-779 (M.D.Ala.); Greenville County School District v. U.S.

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Arakaki v. C & S Electric, Inc. (In Re C & S Electric, Inc.)

    433 B.R. 782 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · Jul 16, 2010

    (“Arakaki”), entered into a contract to build the “Waihee Line Booster MCC Replacement” project for the Board of Water Supply of the City and County of Honolulu (“BWS”). … For example, Brown Wholesale Elec. Co., Inc. v. Trustees of Hawaii Electricians Annuity, 179 F.3d 829 (9th Cir.1999), treated a joint check agreement as a security agreement.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Melton

    353 B.R. 901 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · Oct 30, 2006

    Atkins v. Wain, Samuel & Co. (In re Atkins), 69 F.3d 970, 973 (9th Cir.1995) (citing 11 U.S.C. § 327 (a); Fed. R. Bankr.P. 2014(a); McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Doyle

    340 B.R. 381 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Mar 21, 2006

    In re Brown, 302 B.R. 913, 916 (Bankr.D.Or.2003). A debt is contingent if it does not become an obligation until the occurrence of a future event. … Mazzeo v. USA (In re Mazzeo), 131 F.3d 295, 303 (2d Cir.1997)(internal citations omitted).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Bigler, LP

    443 B.R. 101 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Dec 15, 2010

    Third, ITC obtained board approval through a meeting of its Board of Managers (similar to a board of directors) in Houston — which required board members to fly in from out of town. … See Ghidoni v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Lake Erie Interlock, Inc. (In Re Compugard Services, Inc.)

    335 B.R. 661 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 24, 2005

    As an initial matter, Ohio courts have held that a suit against a board of county commissioners was a suit against the county itself for the purposes of sovereign immunity. Leber v. … Bd. of Educ. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chao v. Duncan (In Re Duncan)

    331 B.R. 70 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Sep 2, 2005

    Navarre v. … First, the Defendant notes that he was not among the members of the Plan’s board of trustees. D. Opp. Br. at 8.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • In re McMahan

    481 B.R. 901 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Oct 25, 2012

    Constitutional Authority to Enter a Final Order Stern v. … Co. v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp. (In re Little Creek Dev.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Southmark Corp. v. Southmark Personal Storage, Inc. (In Re Southmark Corp.)

    138 B.R. 831 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Feb 11, 1992

    Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). … American Waste & Pollution Control Company v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 949 F.2d 1384 (5th Cir.1991). For purposes of this motion, the court must accept the facts as pleaded in the complaint as true.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Hatchett

    31 B.R. 833 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 18, 1983

    Hoos & Co. v. Dynamics Corporation of America, 570 F.2d 433, 439 (2nd Cir.1978). This strict rule is applicable to cases under Chapter 7, Chapter 11, and Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. … See, In re Pigott, 684 F.2d 239 (3rd Cir.1982); In re Tavares, 23 B.R. 129 (Bkrtcy.D.R.I.1982); In re Alsted Automotive Warehouse, Inc., 16 B.R. 924 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.Y.1982); In re Brown, 14 B.R. 233 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ill.1981); In

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Lienhard v. Lehighton Ambulance Ass'n (In re Lienhard)

    498 B.R. 443 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2013

    Brown v. Penn. State Emps. Credit Union (In re Brown), 49 B.R. 558, 560 (Bankr.M.D.Pa.1985). Here, without the Defendant’s knowledge of the bankruptcy filing, a similar result follows. … See Int’l Union, United Mine Workers of America v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Hijjawi

    471 B.R. 917 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · May 14, 2012

    Pre-Petition v. … Pickling v. Flower, Medalie & Markowitz, Esqs.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

    429 F. Supp. 1069 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 7, 1976

    Kleban Engineering Corp. v. Caldwell, 490 F.2d 800 (5th Cir. 1974); Armstrong v. Armstrong, 508 F.2d 348 (1st Cir. 1974); Burgess v. Charlottesville Savings & Loan Ass’n, 477 F.2d 40 (4th Cir. 1973). … The most authoritative interpretation of Section 1441(c) is provided in American Fire & Casualty Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pereira v. Lin

    United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Apr 24, 2020

    Brown Media Corp. v. K&L Gates, LLP, 586 B.R. 508, 523 (E.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting Eurycleia Partners, LP v. Seward & Kissel, LLP, 910 N.E.2d 976, 12 N.Y.3d 553, 883 N.Y.S.2d 147 (N.Y. 2009)). … See Brown Media Corp., 586 B.R. at 528. B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.