Case law

In Re Continental Airlines Corp.

60 B.R. 472 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Apr 11, 1986

Similarly, the IAM’s reliance on Nathanson v. NLRB, 344 U.S. 25 , 73 S.Ct. 80 , 97 L.Ed. 23 (1952), Smith v. … Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); see Alladin Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 603 F.2d 1107, 1112 (5th Cir.1979); Gossett v. Du-Ra-Kel Corp., 569 F.2d 869, 872-73 (5th Cir.1978); Southern Rambler Sales, Inc. v.

Redondo Construction Corp. v. Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority (In re Redondo Construction Corp.)

513 B.R. 772 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · Jul 14, 2014

Enters., Inc. v. … Aircraft Gear Corporation v. Kaman Aerospace Corporation, 875 F.Supp. 485, 495 (N.D.Ill.1995). Also see Southwestern Engineering Co. v.

In Re Bunnell

322 B.R. 331 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 25, 2005

In re Brown, 133 B.R. 860 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1991); In re Shaffer, 228 B.R. 892 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1998). … Stone v. Stephens, 155 Ohio St. 595 , 99 N.E.2d 766 (1951); Rindlaub v. Travelers Ins. Co., 175 Ohio St. 303 , 194 N.E.2d 577 (1963).

In Re Tennis

232 B.R. 403 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 21, 1999

Mickelson v. Leser (In re Leser), 939 F.2d 669, 672 (8th Cir.1991). While the Leser test has been criticized by other courts, 1 it is the test established by the Eighth Circuit and we are bound to follow it. … See, e.g„ In re Kolbe, 199 B.R. 569, 571 (Bankr.D.Md.1996); McCullough v. Brown, 162 B.R. 506, 509 (N.D.Ill.1993).

Burris v. Polivnick (In Re Polivnick)

8 B.R. 621 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Feb 2, 1981

In re Houtman, 568 F.2d 651, 655 (9th Cir. 1978); Matter of Nelson, 561 F.2d 1342, 1346 (9th Cir. 1977); Wright v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); In re Houtman, supra., 568 F.2d at pages 653-654.

In Re Johnson

407 B.R. 364 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 29, 2009

V. … Leake (In re Wuerzberger), 284 B.R. 814, 822 (Bankr.W.D.Va.2002)(Virginia statute has no similar provision to Arkansas’ that provides for the assignment of liens); Western Board of Adjusters, Inc. v.

In Re Pinti

363 B.R. 369 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 13, 2007

Co. v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 530 U.S. 1, 6 , 120 S.Ct. 1942 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1 (2000)). In US. v. … In re Latonya Sharise Brown relied on language from the Supreme Court’s decision in Dewsnup v.

Burris v. Burris (In re Burris)

591 B.R. 779 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 2, 2018

Nelson v. Tsamasfyros ( In re Tsamasfyros ), 940 F.2d 605 , 606 (10th Cir. 1991) ; Grassmann v. Brown ( In re Brown ), 570 B.R. 98 , 112 (Bankr. W.D. Okla. 2017). … Brown , 570 B.R. at 113 ; Hall v. Bolton ( In re Bolton ), 2017 WL 535265 , *2 (Bankr. E.D. Okla. 2017) ; Factoring of Oklahoma, L.L.C. v. Means ( In re Means ), 2006 WL 2847903 , *5, n.12 (Bankr. N.D.

In re City Homes III LLC

564 B.R. 827 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Jan 13, 2017

It starts off with minutes from the board of directors. THE COURT: Okay. … Peter Werwath—Debtors’ History, Board of Directors, Severance Plan, and Willingness to Liquidate at the Case’s Inception. Peter Werwath, CHI’s Board Chairman, was the next witness called. Mr.

Sweetapple Plastics, Inc. v. Shuman (In Re Sweetapple Plastics, Inc.)

77 B.R. 304 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · Aug 13, 1987

Mac Lum, Inc., 643 F.2d 1140, 1143 (5th Cir.1981); Residential Industrial Loan Co. v. Brown, 559 F.2d 438 (5th Cir.1977). Section 11-1-105(1) 10 is the general choice of laws provision under the Georgia commercial code. … Marathon Oil Co. v. Flatau (In re Craig Oil Co.), 785 F.2d 1563, 1567 (11th Cir.1986); Barash v. Public Finance Corp., 658 F.2d 504, 511 (7th Cir.1981); Cohen v.

Hines v. Tanner (In Re Tanner)

17 B.R. 201 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · Jan 18, 1982

On July 24, 1980, the debtor sold ten (10) trees which measured 1170 board feet and received payment in the amount of $431.05. (Defendants’ Exhibit # 1.) … Local Loan Co. v. Hunt, 292 U.S. 234, 244 , 54 S.Ct. 695, 699 , 78 L.Ed. 1230 (1934); Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 19 , 91 S.Ct. 113 , 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and Rule 407, R.B.P.; Sweet v.

Maroun v. New York Mortgage Co. (In Re Maroun)

2010 BNH 8 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · Feb 11, 2010

TILA provides that: [t]he creditor shall clearly and conspicuously disclose, in accordance with regulations of the Board, to any obligor in a transaction subject to this section the rights of the obligor under this section … The creditor shall also provide, in accordance with regulations of the Board, appropriate forms of the obligor to exercise his right to rescind any transaction subject to this section. 15 U.S.C. § 1635 .

Judith Lynn Digregorio

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 19, 2022

In re Brown Fast forward ten years to In re Brown. … First, two of the three prepetition agreements at issue in Brown were “zero- dollar down agreements.” In other words, the debtor was not required to pay any fees 17 Walton v.

In Re Agustin

451 B.R. 617 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Jun 27, 2011

Ass’n v. Ferreira (In re Ferreira), 223 B.R. 258, at 261 (Bankr.D.R.I.1998)) (internal quotations omitted). … Id. at 363 (quoting Lundin & Brown, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, 4th ed., § 128.2, at ¶¶ 12-14.). Under this interpretation, “a change in the amount of the monthly payments hardly constitutes ‘maintenance of payments.’”

Feltman v. Kossoff & Kossoff LLP (In re TS Emp't, Inc.)

603 B.R. 700 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jul 10, 2019

Krys v. Butt , 486 F. App'x 153 (2d Cir. 2012) ; see Glob. Crossing Estate Representative v. Winnick , No. 04 Civ. 2558 (GEL), 2006 WL 2212776 , at *15 (S.D.N.Y. … Wight v. BankAmerica Corp. , 219 F.3d 79 , 86 (2d Cir. 2000).

California Canners & Growers v. Bank of America, N.T. & S.A. (In Re California Canners & Growers)

74 B.R. 336 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · May 27, 1987

On February 27, 1986, Bates, Khourie, and Casazza attended a Cal Can Board of Directors meeting. … See Raley Co. v.

Christmas v. Maryland Racing Commission (In Re Christmas)

102 B.R. 447 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Jun 15, 1989

Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board, [ 31 Cal.2d 401 ], 189 P.2d 17 , certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 814 [ 69 S.Ct. 31 ], 93 L.Ed. 369 ; State v. West Virginia Racing Commission [ 133 W.Va. 179 ], 55 S.E. 2nd 263. … Assoc. v.

Health & Welfare Plan for Employees of Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Eagleston (In Re Eagleston)

236 B.R. 183 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Jul 15, 1999

Res judicata cannot form the basis for a decision of nondischargeability as held by the United States Supreme Court in its decision of Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). … However, in Brown , the Court did note that collateral estoppel may apply in nondischargeability proceedings.

Wesley Howard Hitchcock

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · Aug 14, 2020

Nat’l Bank of Ark. v. Panther Mountain Land Dev., LLC (In re Panther Mountain Land Dev., LLC), 686 F.3d 916, 921 (8th Cir. 2012). … He testified that the Brown County real estate was higher quality for Nebraska.

Elsinore Shore Associates v. New Jersey Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (In Re Elsinore Shore Associates)

66 B.R. 708 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 2, 1986

The Licensing Board for the City of Boston (Board) refused to renew the debtor’s liquor licenses pursuant to a state statute requiring a licensee in bankruptcy to either pay prepet-ition taxes or develop a repayment plan … The Duffey v.