Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

1.01s

  • Timothy C. v. GVL Lake Properties, LLC (In re Timothy C.)

    510 B.R. 114 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · May 5, 2014

    The Rook-er-Feldman doctrine, which takes its name from two cases, Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 , 44 S.Ct. 149 , 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923) and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. … In Hamilton v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sunrise Island, Ltd. v. Goldman Sachs & Co. (In re Sunrise Island, Ltd.)

    203 B.R. 171 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1996

    There is no written resolution reflecting a May 4, 1995 meeting of the Gaming Board of Directors. Ballard did not inquire into the validity of the Board of Directors meeting referenced in the Secretary’s Certificate. … See Fla.Stat. § 607.0832 (1990); Colorado Business Corporation Act § 7-108-501; Robert A Wachsler, Inc. v. Florafax Intern.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Bradley

    19 B.R. 265 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · Mar 26, 1982

    Randolf v. Little, 62 Ala. 396 (1878); Ely v. Blacker, 112 Ala. 311 , 20 So. 570 (1896). … In re Browning, 13 B.R. 6 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Ala.1981).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hudtwalker v. Van Nostrand & Martin (In Re Vantage Petroleum Corp.)

    40 B.R. 34 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Apr 11, 1984

    Carlino observed that a corporation acts through its board of directors and that to waive the attorney-client privilege, a majority vote of the board was required. … (citing United States v. Gurtner, 474 F.2d 297, 298 (9th Cir.1973) and United States v. Osborn, 561 F.2d 1334, 1339 (9th Cir.1977)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carolyn Bostick

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Apr 29, 2025

    Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). … Because she has failed to make a clear showing that a stay is warranted, see United States v. Texas, 144 S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Olson v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Treasury (In Re Olson)

    170 B.R. 161 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · Apr 7, 1994

    See Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 , 284 & n. 11, 111 S.Ct. 654 , 658 & n. 11, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991); Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 2213 n. 10, 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). See also Johnson v. … Combs v. Richardson, 838 F.2d 112, 116 (4th Cir.1988). Cf. Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 132 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2210 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • In Re New York Trap Rock Corp.

    126 B.R. 19 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Apr 17, 1991

    See Holland v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 772 F.2d 1140 , 1145-46 (4th Cir.1985), summarily aff'd sub nom. Brooks v. Burlington Indus., Inc., 477 U.S. 901 , 106 S.Ct. 3267 , 91 L.Ed.2d 559 (1986); Gilbert v. … In Dodd v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Simek v. Erdman (In Re Erdman)

    236 B.R. 904 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · May 25, 1999

    Erd-man testified at trial that he was the only member of SBD’s board of directors, that is, in effect that, “[he] was the board of directors.” … Danks v. Holland, 246 N.W.2d 86, 90 (N.D.1976). However, in Schriock v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Morales

    387 B.R. 36 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · May 8, 2008

    Commercial Corp. v. Rash, 520 U.S. at 959, n. 2 . … Commercial Corp. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In Re Melito

    357 B.R. 684 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 4, 2007

    I acknowledge support for an inference of termination by abandonment in the early Massachusetts cases cited in Marrama, for example, Drury v. Bachelder, 77 Mass. (11 Gray) 214, 216 , 1858 WL 6441 (1858); Silloway v. … Brown, 94 Mass. (12 Allen) 30, 33 , 1866 WL 4795 (1866).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pinson v. Pioneer WV Federal Credit Union (In re Pinson)

    548 B.R. 443 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · Mar 28, 2016

    See Weintraub v. … The bracketed "Bureau” stands in place of “Board,” which referred to the Federal Reserve Board, the body which formerly promulgated the official interpretations of Regulation Z.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Adelphia Communications Corp. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)

    302 B.R. 439 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Dec 5, 2003

    See Homsy v. … See United States v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Joel I. Sher, Chapter 11 Trustee v. JP Morgan Chase Funding Inc.

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Dec 17, 2019

    Instead, each transfer wa approved by the board of directors and/or a committee of the board. … Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 379 (4th Cir. 2008) (quoting U.S. ex rel. Willard v. Humana Health Plan of Texas Inc., 336 F.3d 375, 384 (5th Cir. 2003)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Ahn Homecare, LLC

    222 B.R. 804 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 10, 1998

    Board of Governors, 900 F.2d 852 (5th Cir.1990) aff'd in part, rev'd in part, Board of Governors v. MCorp Financial, 502 U.S. 32 , 112 S.Ct. 459 , 116 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991). … Heckler v. Ringer, 466 U.S. 602, 615 , 104 S.Ct. 2013, 2022 , 80 L.Ed.2d 622 (1984) (quoting Weinberger v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ogier v. Steele (In Re Buckhead Oil Co.)

    454 B.R. 242 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Mar 21, 2011

    Further, the Court of Appeals in Tom Brown Contracting, Inc. v. … In short, as the Tom Brown case said, there is a promise by the guarantor to Allied to render performance to a non-party, in this case the Debtor.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rose v. U.S. Dept. of Education (In Re Rose)

    215 B.R. 755 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 19, 1997

    Dep’t v. Taxel (In re Del Mission Ltd.), 98 F.3d 1147 , 1152 n. 6 (9th Cir.1996); Wyoming Dep’t of Transp. v. Straight (In re Straight), 209 B.R. 540, 555-58 (D.Wyo.1997); AER-Aerotron, Inc. v. … Two other cases, Headrick v. Georgia (In re Headrick), 200 B.R. 963 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.1996), and Burke v. Georgia (In re Burke), 200 B.R. 282 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.1996), relied on Langenkamp v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Ablan v. Weber (In Re Weber)

    81 B.R. 482 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Jun 18, 1986

    Warren v. McCall, 709 F.2d 1183, 1184 (7th Cir.1983); In Re Wilcher, 56 B.R. 428, 435-36 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1985); In Re Smith, 37 B.R. 996, 998 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1984). See Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 129, 139, n. 10 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2208, 2213, n. 10 , 60 L.Ed.2d. 767 (1979).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Moulder v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust (In re National Trust Group, Inc.)

    98 B.R. 90 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Mar 24, 1989

    Plaintiff offers this document through the testimony of Charles Atkins, President and Chairman of the Board of National Trust Group (“NTG”), and member of the board of Southern California Savings (“So-Cal”). … For example, in United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Kamps

    217 B.R. 836 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Feb 20, 1998

    McClellan Federal Credit Union v. Parker (In re Parker), 193 B.R. 525, 527-28 (9th Cir. BAP 1996); 801 Credit Union v. … In Arnhold v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Geoghagan v. Lambert (In re Lambert)

    59 B.R. 503 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 2, 1986

    investigator for the State Department of Insurance, State of Alabama, testified that two other applications for insurance turned in by this debtor to the plaintiff’s agency, which applications were in the name of Frickett and Brown … See Birmingham Trust National Bank v. Case, (11th Cir., 1985), 755 F.2d 1474 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.