Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

1.36s

  • Matter of Bryant

    28 B.R. 362 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 31, 1983

    The debtor stated that the decision of the Joint Board of International Harvester in the union’s appeal of the company’s decision not to pay S.U.B. benefit enhanced debtor’s state court civil suit against Harvester. … In re International Airport Inn Partnership, 517 F.2d 510 , (9th Cir.1975); In re Waldrep, 20 B.R. 248 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Tex.1982); Hammerer v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Colegrove v. Hoopa Timber Corp. (In Re Colegrove)

    9 B.R. 337 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 1981

    BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. On May 14, 1980 the above entitled debtors filed a petition with this Court pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (being Case Number 1-80-00457). … They further contend that no other civil rights are involved or actions available because the tribe did not consent to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, but as stated in Daly et al. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Matter of Cano

    122 B.R. 812 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Jan 4, 1991

    Pagan, 698 F.2d 38, 40 (1st Cir.1983) (V2 of hourly rate); McDonald v. Armontrout, 860 F.2d 1456, 1463 (8th Cir.1988) (V2 of hourly rate); Rose Confections, Inc. v. … Ambrosia Chocolate Co., 816 F.2d 381, 396 (8th Cir.1987) (full hourly rate); Craik v. Minnesota State University Board, 738 F.2d 348, 350 (8th Cir.1984) (full hourly rate).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Industrial National Bank of Rhode Island v. Miceli (In Re Gencarelli)

    14 B.R. 751 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · Oct 20, 1981

    Harris v. Lamping, 12 B.R. 38 , 7 B.C.D. 942 (E.D.Wis.1981); Matto’s Inc. v. Olde Colonie Place, 9 B.R. 89 , 7 B.C.D. 351 (E.D.Mich.1981). … See also Missouri v. Baker, et al., 647 F.2d 768 , 7 B.C.D. 548 (8th Cir. 1981). The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Missouri v. U.S.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In re Bogan

    534 B.R. 346 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Apr 7, 2015

    See Matter of Brown, 56 B.R. 954, 958 (Bankr. E.D.Mich.1986). In re Kobaly, 142 B.R. [743] at 748-49 [ (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1992) ]. … See Carey v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Coaches Sports Techniplex, Inc. v. Williams (In re Coaches Sports Techniplex, Inc.)

    65 B.R. 308 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Oct 7, 1986

    Trevino, Chairman of the Board of Coaches and the officer responsible for raising capital for Coaches, informed Williams that Coaches was in desperate need of capital. 8. … Canal Authority v. Callaway, 489 F.2d 567 (5th Cir.1974) set forth the standard for the issuance of a preliminary injunction.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Meeks

    349 B.R. 19 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Aug 24, 2006

    . § 522 (f)(1)(A); Morgan v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In re Morgan), 149 B.R. 147, 151 (9th Cir. BAP 1993); Premier Capital, Inc. v. Philip V. DeCarolis and Timothy P. … Russell, Bankruptcy Evidence Manuel § 701.2 at page 1218 (West 2006 edition), quoting In re Brown, 244 B.R. 603, 612 (Bankr.W.D.Va.2000).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Lewis

    400 B.R. 417 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · Feb 5, 2009

    BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. The Debtor, June R. Lewis, filed a case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on December 2, 2008 (doc. # 1). … CFCU quoted the Supreme Court’s holding in Owen v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass'n v. Mathis (In Re Yellow Cab Cooperative Ass'n)

    178 B.R. 265 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · Feb 17, 1995

    Sweetwater I, supra, at 730 (emphasis added). 6 *268 Accord, Klingman v. … This portion of In re Brown, 734 F.2d 119 (2d Cir.1984) appears to have been subsequently rejected by the Second Circuit in dicta.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bolen v. Mercedes Benz, Inc. (In Re Bolen)

    295 B.R. 803 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Jun 21, 2002

    Co. v. … See Brown v. Town & Country Sales & Serv. Inc. (In re Brown), 237 B.R. 316 , 321 fn. 7 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1999) (“The automatic stay is the most fundamental protection afforded a debtor when bankruptcy is filed.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In Re Fleming

    258 B.R. 488 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 30, 2000

    First, the Court notes that Pollock v. … See United States v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Barber

    318 B.R. 921 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · Dec 27, 2004

    See Goodman v. Lewis, 247 Ga. 605 , 277 S.E.2d 908 (1981); Cavin v. Brown, 246 Ga.App. 40 , 538 S.E.2d 802 (2000). The Trustee also argues “badges of fraud,” citing case law from as early as 1936.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Arias Nussa

    565 B.R. 209 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · Jan 13, 2017

    BAP 2010);Gibson v. Gibson (In re Gibson), 219 B.R. 195, 205 (6th Cir. BAP 1998); In re Brown, 2012 WL 10191 , at *3 (Bankr. D. Mass. Jan. 3, 2012); In re Burckhalter, 389 B.R. 185, 190 (Bankr. D. … See Farrey v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Mitchell

    125 B.R. 5 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · Feb 13, 1991

    Those allowing bifurcation include: In re Hart, 923 F.2d 1410 (10th Cir.1991); Wilson v. … See, Maiatico v. United States, 302 F.2d 880, 886 (D.C.Cir.1962); In re Brown, 329 F.Supp. 422, 425 (S.D.Iowa 1971). This court accepts this tenet.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Osborne

    United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · Aug 13, 2019

    , who is recognized by the board as having met the requirements established by the board to engage in advanced nursing practice, and who holds a master's degree or other graduate degree from an approved … La. 1996) (foreseeability of injury not sufficient to sustain § 523(a)(6) claim); see also Morris v. Brown (In re Brown), 489 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Elsaesser v. Ioane (In Re Lindsey)

    351 B.R. 733 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · Jan 25, 2005

    .; Golden Opportunity Trust (“GOT”); Vern Brown; Darrell Willis; and the “John Does 1-20” were subsequently defaulted and default judgment was entered. See Adv. Doe. No. 186; Adv. Doc. … Even setting aside questions of Rule 54(b), the appeal, and the motion for stay pending appeal, the presence of judgment against some of the defendants on some of the counts does not readily support “across the board” relief

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Haig v. Shart (In re Shart)

    505 B.R. 13 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Jan 29, 2014

    Haig agreed to have at least the majority of her horses boarded and trained at Greystone. Between March 2007 and December 2008, Creditors boarded on average twenty to twenty-five horses at Greystone. … Shart promised to construct the Barn as an incentive for Creditors to board the horses at Greystone.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re MacKlin

    236 B.R. 403 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 26, 1999

    See, e.g., In re Taylor, 130 B.R. 849, 854 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1991); In re Brown, 82 B.R. 68, 71-72 (Bankr.W.D.Ark.1987); Crumley v. Berry, 298 Ark. 112, 113-14 , 766 S.W.2d 7, 8-9 (1989); Hill v. … Bentco Leasing, Inc., 288 Ark. 623, 628 , 708 S.W.2d 608, 610-11 (1986); McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Seven Day Builders, 1 Ark.App. 121, 126 , 613 S.W.2d 837, 838-39 (1981); Bell v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Statutory Committee of Unsecured Creditors Ex Rel. Iridium Operating LLC v. Motorola, Inc. (In Re Iridium Operating LLC)

    373 B.R. 283 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Aug 31, 2007

    VFB LLC v. … Co. v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • In Re Walker

    276 B.R. 568 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · Mar 22, 2002

    Id,.; see also Haig v. … Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603 , 81 S.Ct. 1144, 1146 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961). It is the very kind of problem that the legislature can address.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.