Case law

In re Mangia Pizza Investments, LP

480 B.R. 669 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · Jun 14, 2012

Co. v. Fed. … Bank v.

In re Edwards

501 B.R. 666 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 14, 2013

Edwards further argues that, pursuant to Armes v. … See Reed v.

Illinois Ex Rel. Burris v. Tapper (In Re Tapper)

123 B.R. 594 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 24, 1991

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 2213 n. 10, 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). Collateral estoppel is foreclosed when there are disparate burdens of proof in the state and bankruptcy forums. Krenowsky v. … Id. 4 .The Supreme Court in Brown v.

In Re Palmer

403 B.R. 18 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · Apr 7, 2009

Smaller later gave Palmer the title of “deputy director,” but his duties and responsibilities did not increase or change, he was not a member of the board of directors, and he never attended board meetings. 6. … Davis v. United States, 961 F.2d 867, 873 (9th Cir.1992) (citing Thibodeau v. United States, 828 F.2d 1499, 1503 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam); Wood v. United States, 808 F.2d 411, 415 (5th Cir.1987); United States v.

Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. Pochel (In Re Pochel)

64 B.R. 82 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · Jun 4, 1986

Gleason v. Thaw, 236 U.S. 558 , 35 S.Ct. 287 , 59 L.Ed. 717 (1915), 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 11 523.05A at 523-15 (15th ed. 1985). … In Brown v.

Faw v. Wiles (In re Wiles)

145 B.R. 346 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 22, 1992

In Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979), the United States Supreme Court held that bankruptcy courts are not bound by the doctrine of res judicata in dischargeability proceedings. … Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 , 111 S.Ct. 654 , 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991).

Bank of Dixie v. King (In Re Honeycutt Grain Co.)

41 B.R. 678 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jul 27, 1984

King did not establish at trial by way of a resolution by the debtor corporation’s Board of Directors that the debtor corporation’s officers were authorized to either borrow or to loan money to Mr. King. … Ponwells & Associates, Inc. v. Fiumava, 233 So.2d 16 (4th Cir.1970). Even though Mr.

Williams v. Adams (In Re Adams)

349 B.R. 199 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 17, 2006

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 136-37 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2211-12 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); In re Holiday Interval, Inc., 114 B.R. 177, 181 (Bankr.W.D.Mo. 1989). 6 . Shahan v. Shahan, 988 S.W.2d 529, 531 (Mo.1999). 7 . … See also, Taneff v.

In Re Weise

455 B.R. 702 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Sep 8, 2011

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO CLAIMS SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. The rule of priority of judgment liens in Wisconsin is “first in time, first in *703 right.” See, e.g., River Valley State Bank v. … In 2006, well before the bankruptcy petition, the Brown County Circuit Court entered two judgments against the Debtor.

In re Billings

262 B.R. 88 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Feb 26, 2001

Since that time, Billings has provided her room and board. … See Connell v. Crawford, 101 Cal.App. 162 , 281 P. 442 (1929). For the foregoing reasons, the trustee’s objection to Billings’ Chapter 18 plan will be overruled and the plan will be confirmed.

Corus Construction Venture, LLC v. Laketown Wharf Marketing Corp. (In Re Laketown Wharf Marketing, Corp.)

433 B.R. 419 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · Jul 19, 2010

The United States Supreme Court established a bifurcated analysis of the phrase “excusable neglect” in Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. … BROWN; LEAH W. BROWN; RANDAL D. COMPTON; LISA A. COMPTON; ELIZABETH S. DOYLE; MICHAEL B.

First National Bank v. Davison (In Re Davison)

296 B.R. 841 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Aug 18, 2003

In Marine Midland Business Loans, Inc. v. … Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1294 (10th Cir.1997) (as a matter of law, absent other evidence of fraud, no inference of fraudulent intent can be drawn from omission from debtor’s schedules when debtor promptly brings

Woolman v. Wallace (In Re Wallace)

289 B.R. 428 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 19, 2003

Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1294 (10th Cir.1997) (“In order to deny a debtor’s discharge pursuant to this provision, a creditor must demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the debtor knowingly and fraudulently … Crews v. Topping (In re Topping), 84 B.R. 840, 842 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1988) (citation omitted). 22 . See, e.g., Ryan v.

Schilling v. Electronic Realty Associates, Inc. (In Re Hearn)

49 B.R. 143 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · Apr 12, 1985

WILLIAM BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. … See Cantrill Constrution Company v. Carter, 418 F.2d 705 (6th Cir.1969). Further, Truscon Steel Co. v. Thirwell Elec.

Traditional Industries, Inc. v. Ketaner (In Re Ketaner)

149 B.R. 395 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Dec 30, 1992

Rountrey v. Lee (In re Lee), 90 B.R. 202, 207 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1988). As to the definition of maliciousness, there is no requirement that specific malice or spite be proven. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. … Ozark National Life Insurance Company v. Hallaban (In re Hallaban), 78 B.R. 547 (Bankr.C.D.Ill.1987), aff'd, 113 B.R. 975 (C.D.Ill.1990), aff'd, 936 F.2d 1496 (7th Cir. 1991); but see Dorr & Associates v.

In Re Taylor & Associates, L.P.

193 B.R. 465 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 8, 1996

Leasing Corp. v. Sims (In re Sims), 994 F.2d 210 , 221 (5th Cir.1993) (quoting Rimell v. … IBM Credit Corp. v.

Greenleaf Apartments, Ltd. v. Soltesz (In Re Greenleaf Apartments, Ltd.)

158 B.R. 456 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · May 17, 1993

Minatsis v. Brown, 713 F.Supp. 1056, 1058 (S.D.Ohio 1989). … Osborne v. Columbus, D. & M. Ry., 21 Ohio Dec. 744 (C.P. Marion County 1910). See, also, Stiver v.

In Re Pokrzywinski

311 B.R. 846 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Jul 21, 2004

Williams v. Seeley (In re Williams), 227 B.R. 83, 86 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1998). … See Associates Commercial Corp. v.

In re Williams

528 B.R. 814 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Apr 1, 2015

v. … N.D.Ill.1986) (state government entities are not prevented from exercising their police or regulatory powers; stay is operative to prevent enforcement of money judgment under state consumer fraud act); Brown v.

Tamposi v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In Re Tamposi Family Investment Properties)

159 B.R. 631 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · Jul 14, 1993

The Court in Granfinanciera v. … The only Supreme Court authority this court has been able to find that is even arguably contrary is the case of Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System of the United States v.