Case law

Matter of Sims

101 B.R. 52 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Jun 1, 1989

Kelly v. … Gilliam, 67 B.R. at 86 n. 6 (quoting Brown v. Shriver (In re Brown), 39 B.R. 820, 827 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1984)).

In Re Mortgages Ltd.

444 B.R. 585 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · Feb 15, 2011

Garland Allen Brown, WBPP, PLLC, Scottsdale, AZ, for Stratera Portfolio Advisors, LLC, Greenberg, Traurig LLP. Robert Caley Brown, Mariscal, Weeks, McIntyre et al., Phoenix, AZ, for Gold Creek, Inc. Steven J. … Brown, Steve Brown & Associates, LLC, Phoenix, AZ, for AMH Investments LLC, Ashley M. Coles Family Trust, Ashley M. Coles, Trustee, First Trust Company of Onaga, Custodian FBO Ashley M.

McGraw v. Fox (In re Bell)

50 B.R. 419 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 22, 1985

United States v. Brown, 31 F.R.D. 185 (W.D.Mo.1962), Donovan v. Porter, 584 F.Supp. 202 (D.Md.1984). As previously indicated, the Trustee’s requests for admission have not been answered.

Yousuf v. Samantar (In re Samantar)

537 B.R. 250 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Sep 22, 2015

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Chicot Cty. Drainage Dist. v. Baxter State Bank, 308 U.S. 371, 378 , 60 S.Ct. 317 , 84 L.Ed. 329 (1940). In Brown v. … There is a slight difference between Brown v. Felson and this case, in that in Brown v. Felson, the judgment was entered pre-petition, while in this case the judgment was entered post-petition.

Matter of Turner

13 B.R. 15 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · Apr 18, 1981

Ann. § 9-306(2); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. First National Bank, 504 F.2d 998, 1001-02 (15 U.C.C. Rep. 553) (7th Cir. 1974). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. First National Bank, supra, at 1002-04; Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Farmers Bank of Portageville, 358 F.Supp. 317, 323-24 (13 U.C.C.

Glauser v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (In Re Glauser)

365 B.R. 531 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 2007

Brannam v. Huntington Mortgage Co., 287 F.3d 601, 606 (6th Cir.2002) (quoting Grigsby v. Thorp Consumer Discount Co. … Pursuant to this authority, the Federal Reserve Board promulgated "Regulation Z,” which is memorialized in 12 C.F.R. § 226 . Rossman v. Fleet Bank (R.I.) National Association, 280 F.3d 384, 389 (3d Cir.2002).

In Re Meyer

467 B.R. 451 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Mar 22, 2012

v. … Regan v.

Goldstein v. Albert (In Re Albert)

277 B.R. 38 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 21, 2002

Whiting v. Locara, 187 F.3d 317 (2d Cir.1999); Brown v. National Survival Games, Inc., No. 91-CV-221, 1994 WL 660533 , at *4 n. 1 (N.D.N.Y. November 18, 1994) (citing Armstrong v. … Brown v. National Survival Games, Inc., No. 91-CV-221, 1994 WL 660533 at *3, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16572 (N.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 1994).

In Re Turner

44 B.R. 118 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 5, 1984

Snodgrass, supra; see State v. Haney, 277 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.1955). … New Madrid Banking Co. v. Brown, 165 Mo. 32 , 65 S.W. 297 (1901) demonstrates just how far a Missouri Court has gone in granting relief in a homestead abandonment case.

Laudani v. Tribeca Lending Corp. (In Re Laudani)

401 B.R. 9 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 16, 2009

and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, or a suitable substitute. … Unless demonstrably irrational, [the Board’s] staff opinions construing the Act or Regulation should be dispositive.” Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 565 , 100 S.Ct. 790 , 63 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).

Schreiber v. Emerson (In Re Emerson)

1999 BNH 37 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · Oct 26, 1999

See Hayes, 229 B.R. at 259 (citing Gillickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1293 (10th Cir.1997)); Lansdowne v. Cox (In re Cox), 41 F.3d 1294, 1297 (9th Cir.1994); Barclays/American Business Credit, Inc. v. … See Gillickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1293 (10th Cir.1997); Equitable Bank v. Miller (In re Miller), 39 F.3d 301, 307 (11th Cir.1994); Burgess, 955 F.2d at 138 .

In Re Inmon

137 B.R. 757 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · Feb 19, 1992

Monroe v. Monroe, 250 Ark. 434 , 465 S.W.2d 347, 350 (1971). Indeed, in Robinson v. … Ray, 107 Ark. 281 , 154 S.W. 499 (1913), or move elsewhere in order to conduct business however long, Brown v. Watson, 41 Ark. 309 (1883), all the while retaining their homestead.

HDR Farms Incorporated Liquidating Trust v. Applied Botanics LLC f/k/a XSI USA, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · Dec 15, 2022

See Petroleum Enhancer, LLC v. … See Marrs v. Kelly, 95 S.W.3d 856, 860 (Ky. 2003) (proximate cause is a necessary element of a legal malpractice claim); Douglas Walter Greene v. Frost Brown Todd, LLC, No. 16-6761, 2017 WL 6210784, at *5 (6th Cir.

In Re Flamand

78 B.R. 644 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · Oct 6, 1987

Brown v. O’Keefe, 300 U.S. 598, 602-603 , 57 S.Ct. 543, 546 , 81 L.Ed. 827 (1937); Rosenblum v. Dingfelder, 111 F.2d 406, 409 (2d Cir.1940). … See Issacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 282 U.S. 734 , 51 S.Ct. 270 , 75 L.Ed. 645 (1931).

Harrington v. Beaudry (In re Beaudry)

549 B.R. 576 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · Apr 8, 2016

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a); see also Brown v. Eli Lilly & Co., 654 F.3d 347, 358 (2d Cir.2011). “Where the moving party demonstrates ‘the absence of a genuine issue of material fact,’ Celotex Corp. v. … Brown, 654 F.3d at 358 (citing Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986)).

Communications Workers, Local No. 11500 v. Akridge (In Re Akridge)

71 B.R. 151 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · Mar 10, 1987

Prior to this strike the Executive Board of the Local decided that the provisions of the CWA Constitution making strikebreaking a punishable offense would be enforced in the event of a strike. … A committee selected by the Executive Board of the Union tried those members who worked during the strike. Approximately 490 members were fined.

In Re the Bible Speaks

74 B.R. 511 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 9, 1987

two points which strike the Court as frivolous: that the Dovydenas claim should be subordinated to other claims under the doctrine of Matter of Sterling Homex, 579 F.2d 206 (2d Cir.1978), cert. den. sub. nom., Jezarian v. … Raichle, 439 U.S. 1074 , 99 S.Ct. 847 , 59 L.Ed.2d 40 (1978), which concerned rescission claims of stockholders; and that voting rights of the Debtor’s board of trustees constitute “interests” impaired under the plan in view

Matter of Claxton

32 B.R. 224 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Aug 8, 1983

Claxton, III had held these positions for several years until about two weeks prior to the Watkins bankruptcy when, in lieu of dismissal by the board of directors, the board permitted him to resign as an officer and director … (Bankruptcy Act § 70e.) [5] The Supreme Court in the case of Cline v.

United Air Lines, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (In re UAL Corp.)

391 B.R. 791 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · May 31, 2008

Co. v. … Co. v.

Barth v. Broshot (In Re Barth)

4 B.R. 141 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 18, 1980

See, e. g., Walker v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); In re Mountjoy, 368 F.Supp. 1087 (W.D.Mo.1973). 11 . See Rule 756 of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.