Case law

Kiernan v. Lambillotte (In Re Lambillotte)

17 B.R. 256 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 21, 1982

Goodrich v. Malowney, 157 So.2d 829 (1963). Leaving aside the question of intent for the moment, it is essential that the Plaintiffs show that the converted item is indeed their property. This they cannot do. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). This Court finds the Plaintiff’s reasoning unpersuasive.

In Re Oak Park Calabasas Condominium Ass'n

302 B.R. 665 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Oct 23, 2003

’s authority and presumed expertise as stated in Lamden v. … Though McClellan v.

Anderson

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · Jul 31, 2026

(citing Amaker v. Foley, 274 F.3d 677, 681 (2d Cir. 2001); Anchorage Assoc. v. Virgin Islands Board of Tax Review, 922 F.2d 168, 175-76 (3d Cir. 1990); Livernois v. … D.N.M. 2016) (“Giving the Default Judgment preclusive effect as to the claim on the debt but not as to its dischargeability is consistent with Tenth Circuit precedent and Brown v.

T.S. Note Co. v. Topsy's Shoppes, Inc. (In re Topsy's Shoppes, Inc.)

118 B.R. 797 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Sep 13, 1990

That on May 2, 1990, defendant United Kansas Bank & Trust and defendant Johnson County Board of County Commissioners filed their Application to Compromise. 9. … Id. at 340 ); See Madison Nat’l Bank v. Newrath, 261 Md. 321 , 275 A.2d 495 (1971).

Reid v. First Tennessee Bank & Tennessee Student Assistance Corp. (In Re Reid)

39 B.R. 24 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 13, 1984

In re Albert, 25 B.R. 98 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ohio 1982); U.S. v. … Brown, 18 B.R. 219 (Bkrtcy.D.Kan.1982) (undue hardship contemplates unique and extraordinary circumstances); In re Adams, 19 B.R. 64 (Bkrtcy.D.Neb.1982) (more than a present inability to pay); In re Briscoe, 16 B.R. 128 (

In Re Double Eagle Construction, Inc.

188 B.R. 406 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 7, 1995

William Blair Realty Partners v. Transit Casualty Co. (In re Transit Casualty Co.), 900 S.W.2d 671, 675 (Mo.Ct.App.1995). See also Mediq PRN Support Serv., Inc. v. … Sam Brown Company v. Allied Products Corp. (In re Sam Brown Co.), Adv. No. 95-4072, Case No. 95^0580.

Matter of Rutkowski

2 B.R. 677 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 14, 1980

As Justice Cardozo stated in Davis v. … A review of the complaint, findings and judgment of the New York Supreme Court case, within the context of the standards prescribed in Brown v.

In Re Smith

145 B.R. 297 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · Sep 4, 1992

The terms of the statute are extremely clear: the filing of a petition in bankruptcy does not stay the continuation of a criminal action against the debtor. 4 Brown v. … Hampton (In re *300 Brown), 51 B.R. 51, 52 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1985) (“11 U.S.C. § 362, by its own terms, does not act to stay a criminal proceeding.”).

BPS Guard Services Inc. v. Myrick (In Re Myrick)

172 B.R. 633 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · Sep 6, 1994

Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-90 , 106 S.Ct. 1348, 1356-57 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Kegel v. Runnels, 793 F.2d 924, 926 (8th Cir.1986). … The contract rights between BPS and its former clients, such as the Nebraska State Board of Agriculture, were owned by BPS, not the debtor.

In Re Brown

402 B.R. 19 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Jul 3, 2008

(iv) Whether Brown was eligible to proceed under Chapter 13. … Kitchens v. Georgia R.R. Bank and Trust Co.

In Re Linc Capital, Inc.

280 B.R. 640 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 18, 2002

Florida Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62, 67 , 120 S.Ct. 631 , 145 L.Ed.2d 522 (2000) (Congress cannot abrogate states’ immunity under Age Discrimination Act); Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. … Lapides v. Board of Regents of University System of Georgia, et al., — U.S. ——, 122 S.Ct. 1640, 1643-44 , 152 L.Ed.2d 806 (2002).

Putterbaugh v. International Harvester Credit Corp. (In Re Mills)

83 A.L.R. Fed. 523 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Aug 10, 1983

Redman, 57 Me. 405, 405 (1869) (quoting Brown v. Williams, 31 Me. 403, 406 (1850)); see Snell v. Libby, 137 Me. 62, 64 , 15 A.2d 148, 149 (1940). … See American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Huntington, 99 Me. 361 , 59 A. 515 (1904); Stickney and Babcock Coal Co. v. Goodwin, 95 Me. 246 , 49 A. 1039 (1901); see also Belfast Savings Bank v.

In Re National Steel Corp.

316 B.R. 287 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 26, 2004

Additionally, in a June 20, 2002 internal communication, Charles Brown (“Brown”), the individual responsible for the global procurement of steel for the Creditor, suggested to Michael Edie (“Edie”), vice president of global … Reading Co. v. Brown, 391 U.S. 471, 475 , 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968).

In Re Kosenka

104 B.R. 40 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · Jun 16, 1989

In so doing, the Brown Court distinguished Freshman : Freshman v. Atkins, 269 U.S. 121, 122, 123 , 46 S.Ct. 41 , [41, 41-42,] 70 L.Ed. 193 (1925) is readily distinguishable. … In re Brown, supra, 51 B.R. at 285 (Bkrtcy.D.C.1985).

Homeway Rentals v. Martin (In Re Martin)

64 B.R. 1 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · Mar 15, 1984

Debtor’s attorney relies heavily on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in Clark v. … The Federal Reserve Board’s treatment of these terminable consumer leases has been unwaivering in its consistency. The Board holds that these terminable consumer leases are not covered by the Truth-in-Lending Act.

Helms v. Hanson (In re Mollie Enterprises, Inc.)

559 B.R. 501 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 28, 2016

Trust Corp. v. Stewart Info. Sens. Corp., 665 F.3d 930, 934 (7th Cir. 2012) (quoting Lease Resolution Corp. v. Larney, 308 Ill. … Lease Resolution Corp., 241 Ill.Dec. 304 , 719 N.E.2d 165 at 170 (“If a company’s board of directors is the only body which can bring a lawsuit on behalf of the company, and the board of directors are the only members of

In re Cambridge Analytica LLC

596 B.R. 1 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 2019

See also Johnson v. U.S. Dep't of Educ. (In re Johnson) , 2018 WL 2670469 , at *21 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. … Goldberg v. Weichert (In re Timberline Energy, Inc.) , 70 B.R. 450 , 453 (Bankr.

In Re Tucker

159 B.R. 325 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · Oct 1, 1993

In re Brown, 152 B.R. 232, 237-38 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1993); In re Lawson, 93 B.R. 979, 984 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1988). … Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz,-U.S.-,-, 112 S.Ct. 1644, 1647-48 , 118 L.Ed.2d 280 (1992). 4 . The objections were all filed by H.

Sandoz v. First National Bank of Lafayette, LA. (In Re Exclusive Industries Corp.)

41 B.R. 493 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · May 15, 1984

Retirement v. … Monticello v. Delavisio, 191 So. 162 (La.App.1939); Bender v. Davis Cash Store, 163 So. 170 (La.App.1935); Newman v. Cannon, 33 La.App. 712 , 9 So. 439 (La.1891) Brittain v.

Matter of Mahan & Rowsey, Inc.

27 B.R. 883 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1983

They rely primarily on Joe Brown Company v. Best, 601 P.2d 755 (Okl.App.1979); Gaddis-Walker Electric Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 526 P.2d 964 (Okl.App.1974); and Forry v. … Accord, Joe Brown Company, Inc. v. Best, 601 P.2d 755 (Okl.App.1979); Gaddis-Wallker Electric Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 526 P.2d 964 (Okl.App.1974).