Case law

Moreland v. Brown

86 F. 257 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 14, 1898

In Marine Bank v. … In Farley v. Turner, 26 Law J.

Brown v. Carver

45 F.2d 673 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 4, 1930

The cause came on for trial before a judge and jury; Brown testified to his retainer and to the value of his services, and called a witness in his support. … Feinberg v. U. S., 2 F.(2d) 955 (C. C. A. 8); Vance v. Chapman, 23 F.(2d) 914 (C. C. A. 8); Standard Oil Co. v. Allen, 50 App. D. C. 87, 267 F. 645 ; De Jianne v. U. S., 282 F. 737 (C. C. A. 3); Robilio v. U.

Cromer v. Brown

88 F.3d 1315 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 15, 1996

Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1735 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Piver v.

Pence v. Brown

627 F.2d 872 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 15, 1980

This is an appeal by Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense, and others from a judgment in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota, the Honorable Bruce M. … The Board stated that it did not have the authority to grant him a discharge, an issue the Board thought best suited for a civil court. . Appellee argues that this case became moot when he was discharged.

Brown v. Slater

23 App. D.C. 51 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1904

to get possession of that property, as *57 against a dishonest mortgagor seeking to retain snch possession, was by way of the action of ejectment, as held by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Willis v. … this class of cases is not among those enumerated in § § 8, 9, and 10 of the Code, which might be so transferred by writ of certiorari, it would remain subject to the rule laid down by this court in the case of Hendley v.

Hamer v. Brown

831 F.2d 1398 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 27, 1987

The decision again was confirmed in a November 4, 1983, letter from Brown to Hamer. Hamer appealed the termination to the president of SAU-Tech and the SAU-Tech Board of Trustees. … Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 283 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 574 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977) (Mt. Healthy); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 597 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2697 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972) (Sindermann ); Pickering v.

Hartz Mountain Corporation v. Donald L. Dotson, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board

727 F.2d 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 24, 1984

In Leedom v. … In Bell & Howell Co. v.

Hiatt v. Brown

175 F.2d 273 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 16, 1949

175 F.2d 273 (1949) HIATT, Warden, v. BROWN BROWN v. HIATT, Warden. No. 12641. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. June 16, 1949. *274 J. Ellis Mundy, U.S. Atty., and Harvey H. Eisinger, Asst. U.S. … Ed. 55 ; United States v. Lipsett, D.C., 156 F. 65 ; Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335 , 41 S.Ct. 501 , 65 L.Ed. 961 , 18 A.L.R. 1276 ; Beard v.

Learned v. Brown

94 F. 876 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 31, 1899

Thayer v. Goodale, 4 La. 221 ; Steele v. Insurance Co., 17 La. St. 200; Turner v. Stetts, 28 Ala. 420 ; White v. Brown, 2 Cush. 412 ; Stilwell v. Staples, 19 N. Y. 401 ; Slark v. Broom, 7 La. Ann. 337 . … Tiner v. The Bride, 5 La. Ann. 756 . When the steamboat Liberty was seized, September 22, 1898, there was on board a piano, which had been placed there by the Medine Music Company.

Brown v. Wohlgemuth

492 F.2d 1238 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 21, 1974

492 F.2d 1238 Brown v. Wohlgemuth 74-1121 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 2/21/74 W.D.Pa., 492 F.Supp. 1238 AFFIRMED

Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice Brewer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 7, 2014

Toll v. … See Chaudhry v. Holder, 705 F.3d 289, 291 (7th Cir. 2013) (“The Board [of Immigration Appeals has] acknowledged that ‘unlawful presence’ and ‘unlawful status’ are distinct concepts.”); Dhuka v.

Eric Nyandwi v. Merrick B. Garland

15 F.4th 836 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 8, 2021

II Because the BIA adopted and supplemented the IJ’s deci‐ sion, we review the IJ’s decision supplemented by the Board’s reasoning. Herrera‐Garcia v. Barr, 918 F.3d 558, 561 (7th Cir. 2019). … Rodriguez‐Molinero v.

Robert Scheick v. Tecumseh Public Schools

766 F.3d 523 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 2, 2014

Kline v. TVA, 128 F.3d 337, 348-49 (6th Cir. 1997); see also Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. … Brown v. Packaging Corp. of Am., 338 F.3d 586, 589-90 (6th Cir. 2003) (statement by supervisor with no involvement in the decision was not direct evidence of age discrimination).

Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. Disney Enterprises, Inc.

702 F.3d 640 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Dec 21, 2012

During the course of the parties’ dispute, Slesinger filed twelve opposition and cancellation proceedings with the Board consolidated under Stephen Slesinger, Inc. v. … The Board’s decision relied on the earlier district court order in Milne ex rel. Coyne v. Slesinger, No. 2:02-cv-0858, 2009 WL 3140439 (C.D.Cal. Sept. 25, 2009).

United States v. Brown

974 F.3d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Sep 9, 2020

FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (citation and quotations omitted). … Brown cites United States v. Carey, 689 F.

Brown v. United States

22 F.4th 1008 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jan 5, 2022

BROWN, RUTH HUNT-BROWN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. … v.

L.D. Hilliard v. Board of Pardons and Paroles

759 F.2d 1190 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 8, 1985

This court holds that state parole board members are absolutely immune from liability *1194 for damages in a § 1983 action. Johnson v. Wells, 566 F.2d at 1018 (citing Cruz v. Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.1974)). … Craft v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 550 F.2d 1054, 1056 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 408 , 54 L.Ed.2d 285 (1977). AFFIRMED. 1 .

Nutter v. Brown

98 F. 892 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Jan 2, 1900

Consequently, we* are governed by the rule applied by us in Masten v. Hunt, 5 C. C. A. 42 , 55 Fed. 78 . and in Ball & Socket-Fastener Co. v. C. A. Edgarton Mfg. Co., 37 C. C. … This topic is disposed of by the limitations which we have put on the application of propositions of this character in De Loriea v. Whitney, 11 C. C. A. 355 , 63 Fed. 611, 621 ; Manufacturing Co. v. Holtzer, 15 C. C.

ASARCO v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

762 F.3d 744 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 8, 2014

Brown v. City of Jacksonville, 711 F.3d 883, 888 n.5 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States v. Dunkel, 927 F.2d 955, 956 (7th Cir. 1991) (per curiam)). … Co. v.

Brown v. Armstrong

949 F.2d 1007 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Nov 25, 1991

949 F.2d 1007 Walter Steven BROWN; Diane Kay Brown, Appellants, v. Gary C. ARMSTRONG; Robert E. Miller; Richard W. Sharp; Joann M. … See Poolman v.