Case law

Bortolon v. Brown

562 U.S. 903 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010

Brown (Sidney) v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc

865 F.2d 1256 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 7, 1988

865 F.2d 1256 Brown (Sidney) v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. NO. 88-2560 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. DEC 07, 1988 1 Appeal From: D.Md. 2 AFFIRMED.

Board of Com'rs v. Geer

108 F. 478 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 13, 1901

This court said, in its opinion rendered on the former hearing (Geer v. Board, 97 Fed. 435, 441 , 38 C. C. … This conclusion is supported by the following-authorities: Gelpcke v. Dubuque, 1 Wall. 175 , 17 L. Ed. 520 ; Clark v. City of Iowa City, supra; Walnut v. Wade, 103 U. S. 683 , 26 L. Ed. 526 ; Koshkonong v.

Raymond Lee Brown v. State of Arkansas

426 F.2d 677 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jun 1, 1970

Relief was also denied in a habeas corpus proceeding in the United States District Court, Brown v. Stephens, 246 F.Supp. 1009 (E.D.Ark.1965), on the grounds that he had failed to exhaust his state remedies. … The court, in an unpublished opinion, stated (1) that it had “serious doubt[s]” as to the validity of the search of Brown’s car, (2) that Brown had exhausted his Arkansas remedies, (3) that Brown’s Texas sentence had been

Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co.

152 F.2d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 24, 1945

Brown. For a more complete statement of the facts in this case, see the opinion of the lower court. Brown v. New York Life Ins. Co., D. C., 58 F.Supp. 252 . … We find nothing in the record to indicate a contract between Brown and the Bank making any of his accounts anything other than general accounts. See Dahl & Penne, Inc. v. State Bank of Portland, supra; Keyes v.

New York Cent. R. Co. v. Brown

63 F.2d 657 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1933

The conductor preceded Brown and climbed the end ladder. Brown mounted the right or west end side ladder, and hurriedly reached for the brake wheel. … Sandri v. Byram, supra.

Freeman v. Railroad Retirement Board

192 F.2d 51 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 2, 1951

The evidence amply supports the Board’s findings of fact. … Pennie v. Reis, 132 U.S. *53 464, 10 S.Ct. 149 , 33 L.Ed. 426 ; McLeod v. Fernandez, 1 Cir., 101 F.2d 20 .

Haupt v. Brown

562 U.S. 986 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 18, 2010

McGee v. Brown

562 U.S. 894 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010

Globe-Wernicke Co. v. Brown & Besly

121 F. 90 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 7, 1902

In the “Leader” case it is shown that for some years prior to 1897 it was open to the world to make box-files for letters and papers, in book-form, of paper-board, with leatherette-covered backs, paper-covered sides, hinged … Hires Co. v. Consumers’ Co., 41 C. C. A. 71 , 100 Fed. 809 ; Sterling Remedy Co. v. Spermine Medical Co., 50 C. C. A. 657 , 112 Fed. 1000 .

Dunne v. Railroad Retirement Board

183 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 16, 1950

“The only issue open as to the facts is whether the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence and that they are not based on error of law.” Monahan v. Railroad Retirement Board, 7 Cir., 181 F.2d 751 . … Citing Squires v. Railroad Retirement Board, 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 182 .

Weixel v. Board of Education

287 F.3d 138 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 29, 2002

See Weixel v. Board of Educ. of City of New York, No. 97-CV-9367, 2000 WL 1100395 (S.D.N.Y., August 7, 2000). … See J.G. v. Board of Educ., 830 F.2d 444 , 447 (2d Cir.1987).

Brown v. California

561 U.S. 1029 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 28, 2010

Brown v. Florida

562 U.S. 846 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010

Brown v. Adams

562 U.S. 861 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010

Alaska v. Federal Subsistence Board

544 F.3d 1089 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 23, 2008

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellee Federal Subsistence Board (“FSB” or “Board”) administers the federal subsistence program at the heart of Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (“ANILCA … V.

United States v. Brown

171 F. App'x 576 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 16, 2006

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Brown has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. … Brown has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government has not filed an answering brief. We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v.

Peggy Williamson v. Charles R. "Dick" Brown

646 F.2d 196 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 28, 1981

Dickens v. United States, 545 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1977). … United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 , 68 S.Ct. 525, 542 , 92 L.Ed. 746 .

Brown v. Washington

561 U.S. 1054 · Supreme Court of the United States · Sep 10, 2010

Stonemetz Printers' Machinery Co. v. Brown Folding-Mach. Co.

46 F. 851 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1891

Co. v. Union S. & S. Co., 43 Fed. … In Young v.