Case law

Mortensen v. Brown

565 U.S. 1100 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 12, 2011

Brown v. United States

562 U.S. 887 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010

Brown v. United States

562 U.S. 933 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 2010

John Taylor, Jr. v. James Brown

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 2, 2015

See  Kunik  v.  … v.  Adobe  Sys.  Inc.,  242  F.3d  772,  777  (7th  Cir. 2001); see also Nelson v. 

Brown v. Lopez

565 U.S. 844 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 3, 2011

Brown v. Thaler

565 U.S. 833 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 3, 2011

Board of Com'rs v. Sherwood

64 F. 103 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 8, 1894

Christie v. Sonoma Co., 60 Cal. 164 ; McCormick v. Tuolumne Co., 37 Cal. 257 ; Board v. Tomlinson, 9 Kan. 167 ; Ryce v. Mitchell Co. (Iowa) 21 N. W. 771 . … Wall v. County of Monroe, 103 U. S. 74 ; Thompson v. Searcy Co., 6 C. C. A. 674 , 57 Fed. 1030 ; Leavenworth Co. v. Keller, 6 Kan. 511 , 523; Mayor v. Ray, 19 Wall. 468, 477 ; Clark v. Polk Co., 19 Iowa, 248 ; Clark v.

Melvin Mikes v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

947 F.2d 353 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 7, 1991

In Borum v. … In Stevenson v.

Gatewood v. Railroad Retirement Board

88 F.3d 886 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jul 8, 1996

Once we determine that the Board’s factual findings are supported by substantial evidence and its decision is not based on an error of law, our task is complete. Accord Bowers v. … After the four years expire, the Board is no longer required to alter its records in response to an employee complaint. Pawelczak v. United States, 931 F.2d 108, 110 (D.C.

Lee Brown v. Dawn Fofana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 25, 2023

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … The pleading standard Brown must meet “is not an exacting standard.” Jaros v.

United States v. Brown

116 F.2d 501 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Nov 18, 1940

Appeal dismissed, in conformity with opinion in United States of America v. Amon Fixico et al., and United States of America v. Betsy Lucas et al., 115 F.2d 389 .

United States v. Brown

325 F. App'x 110 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 26, 2009

Pursuant to L.A.R. 27.4, the Appellant’s sentence will be vacated and this matter will be remanded to the District Court for re-sentencing in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chambers v.

Brown v. Cortez Masto

562 U.S. 1238 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 22, 2011

Robert L. Brown v. State of Alabama

619 F.2d 376 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 16, 1980

The state court found that Brown had committed two separate and distinct crimes and affirmed his conviction. Brown v. State, 367 So.2d 557, 558 (Ala.Cr.App.1978), cert. denied, ex parte Brown, 367 So.2d 559 (Ala.1979). … Brown v. State, 367 So.2d at 559; Sanders v. State, 354 So.2d 44 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 354 So.2d 48 (Ala.1977).

Brown v. United States Attorney's Office

212 F. App'x 193 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 9, 2007

Brown v. United States Attorney’s Office, No. 1:06-cv-00582-CMH (E.D. Va., filed July 10, 2006; entered July 11, 2006). … The district court incorrectly identified Brown as a Virginia state prisoner. Brown is a federal prisoner who must challenge his conviction and sentence in a motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

Patrick Garrison Williams v. Bruce Brown, Warden

609 F.2d 216 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 7, 1980

See Brown v. Wainwright, 576 F.2d 1148, 1149 (5th Cir. 1978). See generally, O’Berry v. Wainwright, 546 F.2d 1204, 1209-14 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 433 U.S. 911 , 97 S.Ct. 2981 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1096 (1977). … In Caver v.

Maurice E. Brown v. Patrick Lee Royalty

535 F.2d 1024 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 5, 1976

Dorrell v. Moore, supra, and Wills v. Townes Cadillac-Oldsmobile, Incorporated, supra. … In Transit Casualty Co. v.

Brown v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.

142 F. 911 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1906

It was not the case of a foreman causing an injury to a fellow workman by some negligent act of his, such as a failure to watch for approaching trains, which the foreman promised to do in Martin v. … Ed. 1051 , or as in Alaska Mining Co. v. Whelan, 168 U. S. 86 , 18 Sup. Ct. 40, 42 L.

DeWayne Perry v. Richard Brown

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 12, 2020

See, e.g., Mayberry v. DiEmann, 904 F.3d 525, 530 (7th Cir. 2018); Schmid v. McCauley, 825 F.3d 348, 350 (7th Cir. 2016); Davis v. Humphreys, 747 F.3d 497, 498 (7th Cir. 2014). … See Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012); Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 413 (2013). We held in Brown v. Brown, 847 F.3d 502, rehearing en banc denied, 869 F.3d 507 (7th Cir. 2017), that Indiana is such a state.

Ezell v. Mobile Housing Board

709 F.2d 1376 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jul 6, 1983

Jones v. Diamond, 519 F.2d 1090, 1098 (5th Cir.1975). … Allen v. United States Steel Corp., 665 F.2d 689, 695 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982).