Case law

Brown v. Fisher

565 U.S. 1185 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 23, 2012

Brown v. Fisher

565 U.S. 1185 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 23, 2012

Brown v. Latin American Music Co., Inc.

498 F.3d 18 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Aug 7, 2007

See Garside v. … Brown, slip op. at 7-8 (citing 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 12-11 and Cabrera v. Teatro del Sesenta, Inc., 914 F. Supp. 743 (D.P.R. 1995)).

Washington v. Board of Education

498 F.2d 11 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 20, 1974

Relying in part on Pickering v. … In Hostrop v. Board of Junior College Dist.

Monahan v. Railroad Retirement Board

181 F.2d 751 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 24, 1950

The only issue open as to the facts is whether the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence and that they are not based on error of law. Squires v. … We perceive no error of law committed by the Board and since our examination of the record has convinced us that the findings of the Board are supported by the evidence, the order of the Board must be affirmed.

United States v. Brown

312 F. App'x 583 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 25, 2009

We have reviewed the record and Brown’s contentions on appeal and find the district court did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004). … See *584 United States v. Brown, No. 8:97-cr00170-GRA-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2008). We grant Brown’s motion to proceed in forma pau-peris.

Henry Floyd Brown v. United States

277 F.2d 204 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 26, 1960

This Court on September 25, 1959, entered an order providing for compliance with the procedural requirements specified in Johnson v. United States, 352 U.S. 565 , 77 S.Ct. 550 , 1 L.Ed.2d 593 , Farley v. … This case bears no substantial resemblance to Tot v. United States, 319 U.S. 463 , 63 S.Ct. 1241 , 87 L.Ed. 1519 , nor to Kelly v. United States, 10 Cir., 246 F.2d 864 .

Diefenthal v. Civil Aeronautics Board

681 F.2d 1039 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 6, 1982

See Capital Airlines v. CAB, 281 F.2d 48 (D.C.Cir.1960). Moreover, the same phrase had been upheld as the statutory basis for regulating smoking on board interstate buses. See National Association of Motor Bus Owners v. … The question to be answered is thus “not what the Board thinks it should do but what Congress has said it can do.” CAB v. Delta Airlines, 367 U.S. 316, 322 , 81 S.Ct. 1611, 1617 , 6 L.Ed.2d 869 (1961).

Brown v. Liberty Loan Corporation Of Duval

539 F.2d 1355 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 6, 1976

, 21 S.Dak.L.Rev. 78, 81-82 (1976); see case comment on Brown v. … Kelly, 1970, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 ; Board of Regents v. Roth, 1972, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 ; Arnett; Goss v.

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States

728 F.3d 1348 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 5, 2013

See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. … See also United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., No. 12-40447, 727 F.3d 343 , 2013 WL 3779225 (5th Cir.

Maghan v. Board of Com'rs

141 F.2d 274 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 1944

Taylor v. Taft, 24 App.D.C. 95 ; Longfellow v. Gudger, 57 App.D.C. 50 , 16 F.2d 653 ; United States ex rel. Crow v. Mitchell, 67 App.D.C. 61 , 89 F.2d 805 ; Caswell v. Morgenthau, 69 App.D.C. 15 , 98 F.2d 296 . … See Hammond v. Hull, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 131 F.2d 23 , where the cases on the subject are collected, and Levine v. Farley, 70 App.D.C. 381 , 107 F.2d 186 .

Genecov v. Federal Petroleum Board

146 F.2d 596 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 15, 1944

Griswold v. The President of the United States, 5 Cir., 82 F.2d 922 ; Hurley v. Federal Tender Board No. 1, 5 Cir., 108 F.2d 574 ; The President of the United States v. Skeen, 5 Cir., 118 F.2d 58 ; Graham v. … Federal Tender Board No. 1, 5 Cir., 118 F.2d 8 ; Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 221 U.S. 612 , 31 S.Ct. 621 , 55 L.Ed. 878 .

Alton R. Brown, Jr. v. United States

464 F.2d 590 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 5, 1972

Monday v. United States, 7 Cir.1970, 421 F.2d 1210, 1214 . Brown co-signed all corporate checks. … ), citing Hewitt v.

Brown v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.

20 F.2d 133 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 3, 1927

Brown, was employed by defendant as a member of a mason’s crew, and at the time of his death was being transported, with other members of the crew, on a “camp train,” to repair a bridge used in interstate commerce.

United States v. Brown

320 F. App'x 58 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 8, 2009

“After [United States v.] Booker, assuming the sentence is not based on a misunderstanding of the Guidelines, we will vacate a sentence only if it is unreasonable.” United States v. Reyes, 557 F.3d 84, 88 (2d Cir.2009). … See United States v. Sanchez, 517 F.3d 651, 660 (2d Cir.2008); cf. Sims v.

United States v. Brown

313 F. App'x 596 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 4, 2009

United States v. Brown, No. 3:06-cr-00018-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. May 28, 2008), and the reasons expressed in our recent decision in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 253-56 (4th Cir.2009). … Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

United States v. Corrine Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jan 9, 2020

United States v. Thomas, 116 F.3d 606, 622 (2d Cir. 1997), and United States v. Brown, 823 F.2d 591, 596 (D.C. … See, e.g., United States v. Heron, 721 F.3d 896, 902 (7th Cir. 2013); United States v. Brown, 352 F.3d 654, 666-70 (2d Cir. 2003); United States v.

G.P. v. Garland

103 F.4th 898 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Jun 11, 2024

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed that decision in December 2021, and G.P. filed a petition for review in this court. … Jennings v.

Kandelin v. Social Security Board

136 F.2d 327 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 9, 1943

This is an appeal by the Social Security Board from a judgment reversing its order, which had denied a “lump- sum” award to the plaintiff — the insured’s son — and had made such an award to his widow. … The Board’s, argument is that, although the insured’s widow concededly could not inherit his intestate personalty in New York, subdivision m does not require that she. should.

Wendell Adrian Brown v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 30, 2023

v. … made by Reed (his nontestifying codefendant) violated Brown’s Confrontation Clause rights under Bruton v.