Case law

United States v. Brown

263 F. App'x 180 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 8, 2008

Brown argues that the evidence identifying him as one of the sellers was insufficient to support a conviction. A defendant challenging the sufficiency of the evidence “bears a heavy burden.” United States v. … Brown took the stand to offer his own version of events; in doing so, he “waive[d] any claim as to the sufficiency of the Government’s case considered alone.” United States v.

United States v. Brown

370 F. App'x 277 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Mar 18, 2010

Using the Guidelines as amended, Brown’s base offense level would be 42. … See United States v. Edwards, 309 F.3d 110, 112 (3d Cir.2002). .

United States v. Brown

215 F. App'x 687 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 27, 2006

We reject Brown’s contention. A review of the record demonstrates that Brown’s sentence was reasonable. … . § 3553 (a), as is required, before sentencing Brown to the low end of the Guidelines range. See United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1128 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2314 , 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).

Willis v. Board of Com'rs

86 F. 872 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 18, 1898

Willis, plaintiff in error, against the board of county commissioners of Wyandotte county, Kan., defendant in error, in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kansas, to recover the sum of $45,-83G.82, … Insurance Co. v. Young, 5 Cranch, 187 ; Pomeroy v. Bank, 1 Wall. 592 ; San Antonio v. Mehaffy, 96 U. S. 312 ; Railroad Co. v. Heck, 102 U. S. 120 ; Boogher v. Insurance Co., 103 U. S. 90 ; Jones v. Buckell, 104 U.

Brown v. Illinois

568 U.S. 1234 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 18, 2013

Brown v. Bolin

570 U.S. 905 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 17, 2013

Brown v. McKee

570 U.S. 903 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 17, 2013

Conger v. Brown

570 U.S. 908 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 17, 2013

United States v. Brown

312 F. App'x 201 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 4, 2009

The district court denied Brown’s § 3582(c)(2) motion because the sentencing court based Brown’s sentence on a statutory mandatory term of life imprisonment and not according to the base level in § 2D 1.1. … Therefore, Brown was not entitled to a sentence reduction under the crack cocaine amendments. United States v. Williams, 549 F.3d 1337 (11th Cir.2008). AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Cain

569 U.S. 926 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 15, 2013

Brown v. Greene

569 U.S. 933 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 15, 2013

Robert Wade Brown, Jr. v. United States

356 F.2d 230 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 25, 1966

State of Alabama, 352 U.S. 191 , 77 S.Ct. 281 , 1 L.Ed.2d 246 , reh. denied 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 553 , 1 L.Ed.2d 561 ; Brown v. … Agent rather than Brown. 1 Cf. Davidson v. United States, supra 349 F.2d at 534 ; Thomas v. State of Arizona, supra 356 U.S. at 402-403 , 78 S.Ct. 885 .

Phillip Brown v. Paul Caspari, Superintendent

186 F.3d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 5, 1999

State v. Brown, 840 S.W.2d 247 (memorandum opinion at 5). … I) in Brown v. Caspari, No. 4:93-CV-1955-JCH (FRB)).

Republican Mountain Silver Mines, Ltd. v. Brown

58 F. 644 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 30, 1893

Corp. § 1042, and citations; Dodge v. Woolsey, 18 How. 331, 341 ; Zabriskie v. Railroad Co., 23 How. 381, 385, 386 ; Peabody v. Flint, 6 Allen, 52 ; March v. Railroad Co., 40 N. H. 548; Robinson v. Smith, 3 Paige, 222 . … Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U. S. 450 ; Oglesby v. Attrill, 105 U. S. 605, 610 ; French v. Gifford, 30 Iowa, 148 ; Foss v. Harbottle, 2 Hare, 461.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States

201 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 11, 1953

Barnidge v. United States, 8 Cir., 101 F.2d 295 . … Ring Construction Corporation v.

United States v. Ronald D. Brown, Jr.

188 F.3d 860 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 18, 1999

v. … On the contrary, in the circumstances, it would have been reasonable to think it was a gun — as Brown himself admits: “Better safe than sorry.” See, e.g., United States v.

James Anthony Sweeton v. Robert Brown, Jr.

27 F.3d 1162 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 1, 1994

In Rufo v. … The statute then lists a large number of factors to be taken into account by the board,

United States v. Charles S. Brown, Jr.

956 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Feb 7, 1992

In reviewing Brown’s alternative motion for a new trial, we must affirm the district court’s denial unless the denial was a clear and manifest abuse of discretion. United States v. … Brown’s 1969 burglary conviction, therefore, was highly probative as impeachment evidence. See United States v. Holmes, 822 F.2d 802, 805 (8th Cir.1987).

Brown v. Hale

569 U.S. 905 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 1, 2013

Brown v. California

569 U.S. 909 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 1, 2013