Case law

United States v. Brown

359 F. App'x 658 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 6, 2010

The district court sentenced Brown to 10 years. Brown filed a notice of appeal, but his appointed lawyer has concluded that the appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw under Anders v. … Brown opposes counsel’s motion. See Cir. R. 51(b). We confíne our review to the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief and in Brown’s response. See United States v.

United States v. Brown

338 F. App'x 697 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 23, 2009

MEMORANDUM ** Christopher Eastman Brown, a former federal prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. … We review de novo, see United States v. *698 Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir.2007), and we affirm.

Larry Bradshaw v. Brown Group, Inc.

258 F.3d 847 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 31, 2001

French v. Foods, Inc., 495 N.W.2d 768, 770 (Iowa 1993). … Thompson v. City of Des Moines, 564 N.W.2d 839, 844 (Iowa 1997).

United States v. Scott v. Brown

672 F.2d 808 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Mar 15, 1982

Brown appealed this decision administratively to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA), which affirmed it. … V, PI. Ex. 9.

Ronald Hunter, Jr. v. Leeds, City of

941 F.3d 1265 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Nov 1, 2019

Brown v. City of Hialeah, 30 F.3d 1433, 1437 (11th Cir. 1994). … Brown v. City of Huntsville, 608 F.3d 724, 741 (11th Cir. 2010) (citing Ex parte City of Tuskegee, 932 So. 2d 895, 904 (Ala. 2005)). The test laid out in Cranman, as modified by Hollis v.

South v. Railroad Retirement Board

131 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 10, 1942

He further insisted that if wrong in this and the proceeding was one to determine if the Board’s findings were supported by evidence, the decision of the Board should be set aside, for the undisputed evidence showed that … In a careful opinion in this case, the same in substance on this point as the one he wrote and caused to be published in Holloway v.

Ariyan v. Sewerage and Water Board

29 F.4th 226 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 21, 2022

Yohey v. … Vogt v. Board of Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 294 F.3d 684 (5th Cir. 2002), and Lafaye v. City of New Orleans, No. 2:20-CV-41, 2021 WL 886118 (E.D. La.

Ellison v. Brown

571 U.S. 994 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 4, 2013

Brown v. Swarthout

571 U.S. 847 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 2013

United States v. Brown

234 F. App'x 452 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 21, 2007

See United States v. Smith, 390 F.3d 661, 663-64 (9th Cir.2004). In reaching this conclusion, we rely only on Brown’s signed guilty plea and Brown’s admissions during the plea colloquy. 1 See United States v. … These facts establish that Brown committed a second generic burglary. See Taylor, 495 U.S. at 599 , 110 S.Ct. 2143 ; United States v. Sparks, 265 F.3d 825, 835-36 (9th Cir.2001).

Nierotko v. Social Security Board

149 F.2d 273 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 14, 1945

B., 3 Cir., 114 F.2d 820 ; Third Annual Report of National Labor Relations Board, page 200. In National Labor Relations Board v. … That may be so, but that the Labor Board has not conceived of back pay as wages, is not so. In N. L. R. B. v.

Brown v. Office of Personnel Management

261 F. App'x 283 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jan 4, 2008

United States v. Brown

222 F. App'x 652 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 27, 2007

Under Illinois v. … United States v. Padilla, 387 F.3d 1087, 1093 (9th Cir.2004). . Id. (quoting Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 300-01 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980)). Cf. United States v.

Benson v. Social Security Board

172 F.2d 682 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 31, 1949

An appeal was taken to the Social Security Board. … Thus the court, referring to its decision in National Labor Relations Board v.

United States v. Michael Robert Brown

792 F.2d 466 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 12, 1986

D’Andrea had no explanation for any changes in Brown’s personality. Following all of the evidence, the trial court refused to instruct the jury on Brown’s insanity defense. Brown was subsequently convicted. In Hall v. … United States v. Hartfield, 513 F.2d 254, 260 (9th Cir.1975).

Dickinson v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.

137 F.2d 615 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 6, 1943

Clark v. City of Weatherford, 143 Okl. 165 , 288 P. 278 ; Dean v. City of New Cordell, 151 Okl. 149 , 3 P.2d 160 ; Blythe v. City of Tulsa, 172 Okl. 586 , 46 P.2d 310 . … Co. et al. v. Mann, 79 Okl. 160 , 192 P. 231 ; Peck-ham et al. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 88 Okl. 174 , 212 P. 427 ; City of Seminole v. Fields, 172 Okl. 167 , 43 P.2d 64 .

Brown v. Alabama

520 U.S. 1199 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 28, 1997

Board of Com'rs v. Platt

79 F. 567 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 22, 1897

Ct. 733; Cutler v. Huston, 158 U. S. 423 , 15 Sup. Ct. 868; Breeze v. Haley, 11 Colo. 351, 355 , 18 Pac. 551 ; Water Co. v. Middaugh, 12 Colo. 434 , 21 Pac. 565 ; Board v. Burpee (Colo. … Co. v. Lyon Co., 44 Fed. 329, 344 ; U. S. v. Board of Auditors, 28 Fed. 407 ; Railroad Co. v. Baker (Wyo.) 45 Pac. 494 . 501; State v. Gloyd (Wash.) 44 Pac. 103 ; Sioux City & St. P. R. Co. v.

Smith v. Board of Education

365 F.2d 770 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Sep 14, 1966

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). The Court forthwith considered the procedure by which this decision was to be implemented. Brown v. … Bradley v. School Board, supra; Rogers v. Paul, supra.

Wanda Birch v. Cuyahoga County Probate Court John J. Donnelly, Presiding Judge

392 F.3d 151 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 1, 2004

Corp. v. … Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577 , 98 S.Ct. 2943 , 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978) (noting that the McDonnell Douglas method for providing disparate treatment “was never intended to be rigid, mechanized, or ritualistic”); Brown v.