Case law

United States v. John Russell Brown

70 F.3d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Nov 24, 1995

Following our remand in United States v. … Relying on United States v. Williams, 923 F.2d 76 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 841 , 112 S.Ct. 131 , 116 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991), we rejected Brown’s claim of prejudice.

Gahr v. Trammel

796 F.2d 1063 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 24, 1986

Kremer v. Chemical Constr. … Allen v.

Alaska Airlines v. Judy Schurke

898 F.3d 904 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 1, 2018

a constitutional violation or [an] egregious violation of the RLA” that would allow for judicial review of the Board’s decision). 38 ALASKA AIRLINES V. … (quoting Brown v. Hotel Emps., 468 U.S. 491, 501 (1984))). The majority asserts that Livadas illuminates a distinction between ordinary conflict preemption and § 301 preemption. Maj. Op. at 25–28.

Social Security Board v. Warren

142 F.2d 974 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jun 7, 1944

In Gray v. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

Farrington v. Board of Water Com'rs

8 F. Cas. 1086 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · Sep 15, 1870

See Wilson v. Simpson, 9 How. [50 U. S.] 109. This case is so nearly analogous to that one, that I quote from it at laifee. … I think the case of Wilson v. Simpson clearly decides this one. It matters not that in that case the cutter knives were not a part of the invention, and that in this case the lips of the auger or bit are.

Brown v. Lamb

397 U.S. 907 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 24, 1970

Lance v. Board of County Commissioners

985 F.3d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 19, 2021

individual capacity; EDWARD MORGAN, in his individual capacity; DANIEL HARPER, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees, and MCALESTER REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER AUTHORITY, d/b/a McAlester Regional Hospital; BOARD … See Lopez v. LeMaster, 172 F.3d 756, 760 (10th Cir. 1999) (setting out the test for the first element), abrogated in part on other grounds, Brown v. Flowers, 974 F.3d 1178, 1182 (10th Cir. 2020). We disagree.

Matthews v. Brown

572 U.S. 1023 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 24, 2014

Vincent Lynch v. United States Parole Commission and Michael Quinlan, Warden, Respondents

768 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 22, 1985

Reynolds v. McCall, 701 F.2d at 814 ; Shahid v. Crawford, 599 F.2d at 671-72 ; Garcia v. Board of Parole, 557 F.2d at 105 . … E.g., Schweiker v.

Brown & Root Inc v. Breckenridge

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 2, 2000

Jordahl v. Democratic Party of Virginia, 122 F.3d 192, 199 (4th Cir. 1997); accord FOCUS v. … Brown & Root relied chiefly on Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1 (1984), and Perry v.

Brown v. Department of the Navy

199 F. App'x 949 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 20, 2006

We consider whether Brown’s petition for review of the June 26, 2006 decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in Brown v. Department of the Navy, 2006 MSPB 177 , 102 M.S.P.R. 377 , should be dismissed. … Brown petitioned the Board for review.

United States v. Brown

279 F. App'x 240 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 30, 2008

See United States v. Brown, No. 5:98-cr-00120-H-1 (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 21, 2008; entered Jan. 23, 2008). … Because Brown's motion for reconsideration was filed December 5, 2007, see Houston v.

Brown v. Matauszak

571 U.S. 1142 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 13, 2014

Brown v. Lopez

571 U.S. 1121 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 13, 2014

James v. Brown

571 U.S. 1134 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 13, 2014

National Labor Relations Board v. Permanent Label Corporation

657 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 30, 1981

See, e. g., Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 558 F.2d 1137 (3d Cir. 1977); NLRB v. Armcor Industries, Inc., 535 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1976). … with NLRB v.

Tamrat Tademe v. St. Cloud State

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 15, 2003

See Saulsberry v. St. … See LaCroix v.

Wilson v. Benefits Review Board

748 F.2d 198 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 5, 1984

The issues on this appeal are whether there was substantial evidence to support the AU’s decision and whether the Board reviewed the AU’s decision under the proper standard. Beavan v. … Hampton v. United States Dept. of Labor Benefits Review Board, 678 F.2d 506, 508 (4th Cir.1982). See also Whicker v.

Estate of De'Angelo Brown v. E.C. West

76 F.4th 1078 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 10, 2023

Brown’s estate appeals. II. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Rynders v. Williams, 650 F.3d 1188, 1194 (8th Cir. 2011). … Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765, 774−75 (2014) (citations omitted). Here, it is undisputed that Brown had his hands up.

United States v. Brown

375 F. App'x 622 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 13, 2010

Brown appeals, but his appointed counsel has concluded that his appeal is frivolous and moves to withdraw. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). … We invited Brown to respond to counsel’s motion, but he has declined to do so. See Cir. R. 51(b). We limit our review to the potential issue identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief. See United States v.