Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersF

10,000+ results

2.40s

  • United States v. Brown

    293 F. App'x 826 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Sep 25, 2008

    See United States v. Danielson, 199 F.3d 666, 670 (2d Cir. 1999) (quoting United States v. Patino, 962 F.2d 263, 266 (2d Cir.1992)). For the same reason, we deny Brown’s alternate argument of prejudicial variance. … See United States v. Mucciante, 21 F.3d 1228, 1236 (2d Cir.1994) (quoting United States v. Heimann, 705 F.2d 662, 669 (2d Cir. 1983)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. John Russell Brown

    70 F.3d 979 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Nov 24, 1995

    Following our remand in United States v. … Relying on United States v. Williams, 923 F.2d 76 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 841 , 112 S.Ct. 131 , 116 L.Ed.2d 98 (1991), we rejected Brown’s claim of prejudice.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Koch v. Brown

    572 U.S. 1037 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 31, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Aud

    572 U.S. 1038 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 31, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Vermont

    572 U.S. 1101 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 5, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Milner v. U.S. Dept of Navy

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 5, 2009

    See Morley v. … The court held that requir- ing the NLRB to disclose its litigation strategies would “com- promis[e] the Board’s ability to defend itself in EAJA actions.” 964 F.2d at 1208. In PHE, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Permanent Label Corporation

    657 F.2d 512 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 30, 1981

    See, e. g., Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 558 F.2d 1137 (3d Cir. 1977); NLRB v. Armcor Industries, Inc., 535 F.2d 239 (3d Cir. 1976). … with NLRB v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Brown

    109 U.S. 180 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jul 1, 1883

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • James Joseph Brown v. United States

    Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 7, 2014

    See Brown v. United States, 526 F.3d 691 (11th Cir. 2008) (“Brown I”), vacated, 556 U.S. 1150, 129 S. Ct. 1668 (2009). On remand, we again affirmed Brown’s conviction and sentence. See Brown v. United States, 329 F. … On November 28, 2011, Brown, citing the Fifth Circuit’s decision in United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Com'rs v. Platt

    79 F. 567 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 22, 1897

    Ct. 733; Cutler v. Huston, 158 U. S. 423 , 15 Sup. Ct. 868; Breeze v. Haley, 11 Colo. 351, 355 , 18 Pac. 551 ; Water Co. v. Middaugh, 12 Colo. 434 , 21 Pac. 565 ; Board v. Burpee (Colo. … Co. v. Lyon Co., 44 Fed. 329, 344 ; U. S. v. Board of Auditors, 28 Fed. 407 ; Railroad Co. v. Baker (Wyo.) 45 Pac. 494 . 501; State v. Gloyd (Wash.) 44 Pac. 103 ; Sioux City & St. P. R. Co. v.

    Cited 83 timesPublished
  • United States v. Terry Lee Brown

    471 F.2d 297 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Nov 6, 1972

    OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Appellant Brown with two codefendants was indicted for violations of Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 2113 and 2. … Scales, 464 F.2d 371 (C.A. 6, 1972); United States v. Miller, 460 F.2d 582 (C.A.10, 1972); Burge v. United States, 333 F.2d 210 (C.A.9, 1964); United States v. Avellino, 216 F.2d 877 (C.A. 3, 1954).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hoffner

    571 U.S. 1210 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 24, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marciano Plata v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 2014

    Brown v. Plata, 131 S. Ct. 1910, 1922 (2011). … H.R. 18 PLATA V. BROWN Rep.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Farrington v. Board of Water Com'rs

    8 F. Cas. 1086 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · Sep 15, 1870

    See Wilson v. Simpson, 9 How. [50 U. S.] 109. This case is so nearly analogous to that one, that I quote from it at laifee. … I think the case of Wilson v. Simpson clearly decides this one. It matters not that in that case the cutter knives were not a part of the invention, and that in this case the lips of the auger or bit are.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Walton

    572 U.S. 1081 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 21, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Kentucky

    423 U.S. 839 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 6, 1975

    Cited 1 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Brown v. Illinois

    572 U.S. 1050 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 7, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Grimmett v. Brown

    519 U.S. 233 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 14, 1997

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Krecic v. Brown

    572 U.S. 1105 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 5, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joye v. Franchise Tax Board

    578 F.3d 1070 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 21, 2009

    The other cases relied on by the Board are also unhelpful. In Schatz v. … Similarly, Ellett v. Stanislaus, 506 F.3d 774 (9th Cir.2007) is of no help to the Board.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.