Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.83s
519 U.S. 845 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text517 U.S. 1156 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 22, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text517 U.S. 1156 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 22, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text517 U.S. 1159 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 22, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text516 U.S. 845 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 2, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text516 U.S. 856 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 2, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text516 U.S. 899 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 2, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text520 U.S. 1189 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 21, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text519 U.S. 1130 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 18, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text520 U.S. 1159 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 31, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textUnited States v. Rita Darlene Brown
602 F.2d 909 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 1979
Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975).” (Brown v. Ohio (1977) 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 .) … Our issue is resolved by United States v. Batchelder (1979)- U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2198 , 60 L.Ed.2d 755 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. Aurelius Wilson Brown
284 F.2d 89 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 21, 1960
It requires no argument to show that there was abundant evidence to justify the finding that Brown was in possession of the illicit whisky with intent to defraud the United States. In Bell v. … See the comment of this court in Davis v. United States, 4 Cir., 279 F.2d 576, 578 ; Call v. United States, 4 Cir., 265 F.2d 167, 170 . Affirmed.
Cited 5 timesPublished519 U.S. 1121 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 18, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textDonyel v. Brown v. Ernie Roe, Warden
279 F.3d 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 2002
Although Brown’s conviction became final prior to the passage of AEDPA, the statute’s time limits apply because Brown filed his petition after AEDPA’s effective date. See Calderon v. United States Dist. … .”); Wimmer v.
Cited 216 timesPublished84 U.S.L.W. 3477 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 29, 2016
Cited 0 timesPublished519 U.S. 1013 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 2, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 26, 2004
Brown’s role in the robberies, assumed a high degree of reliability. See United States v. … Brown of participating in a crime after the fact and point the officers to Mr. Brown’s home address. Cf. Thompson v.
Cited 0 timesPublished519 U.S. 1098 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 21, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text514 U.S. 1119 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 15, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textMarkham & Brown, Inc. v. United States
648 F.2d 1043 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 25, 1981
In Jim Walter Corporation v. … .”); Harder Services, Inc, v.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna