Case law

Ma v. Brown

525 U.S. 930 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 13, 1998

Brown v. California

525 U.S. 934 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 13, 1998

Vorhees v. Brown

525 U.S. 824 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 5, 1998

Brown v. Frazier

525 U.S. 852 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 5, 1998

Brown v. Jones

136 S. Ct. 2420 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 6, 2016

Brown v. Illinois

519 U.S. 970 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 4, 1996

Brown v. Illinois

84 U.S.L.W. 3585 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 18, 2016

Grose v. Brown

510 U.S. 1076 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 18, 1994

Brown v. Shalala

522 U.S. 810 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 6, 1997

Brown v. Gunn

519 U.S. 854 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 1996

Brown v. Louisiana

84 U.S.L.W. 3683 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 20, 2016

United States v. Brian Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jun 9, 2003

Miller v. United States, 123 F.2d 715, 717 (8th Cir. 1941), rev’d on other grounds, 317 U.S. 192 (1942); accord United States v. … United States v. Rohwedder, 243 F.3d 423, 427 (8th Cir. 2001). In United States v.

United States v. Brown

408 F. App'x 759 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 21, 2011

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 , 120 S.Ct. 1595 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 , 123 S.Ct. 1029 , 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). … Additionally, we construe Brown’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003).

Raz v. Brown

523 U.S. 1078 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 20, 1998

Case v. Brown

69 U.S. 320 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 31, 1865

69 U.S. 320 17 L.Ed. 817 2 Wall. 320 CASE v. BROWN. … Moore, 1 Curtis, 279. 3 Winans v. Denmead, 15 Howard, 338 ; Brooks v. Fiske, Id. 215; Hogg v. Emerson, 6 Id. 437; Neilson v. Harford, Webster's Patent Cases, 350, 370; Morris v.

Diamond Stone Sawing Mach. Co. v. Brown

130 F. 896 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · Apr 7, 1904

The specification states: “As thus arranged, the rotation of the pulley V' will, through the pinion V, gear wheel S', pinion S, and gear wheel R, be communicated to the mechanism for moving the saw-frame vertically, and cause

Zevalkink v. Brown

521 U.S. 1103 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 23, 1997

United States v. John Henry Brown

411 F.2d 478 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 6, 1969

Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 , 45 S.Ct. 280 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925); Williams v. United States, 404 F.2d 493 (5 Cir. 1968). … [Citing cases] Williams v.

United States v. Rita Darlene Brown

602 F.2d 909 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 22, 1979

Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 785 n. 17, 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975).” (Brown v. Ohio (1977) 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2225 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 .) … Our issue is resolved by United States v. Batchelder (1979)- U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2198 , 60 L.Ed.2d 755 .

McRae v. Brown

520 U.S. 1245 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 27, 1997