Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.19s
157 F. 797 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1907
v. … Castle v. Bullard, 64 U. S. 172 , 16 L. Ed. 424 .
Cited 2 timesPublished644 F.3d 969 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 12, 2011
BROWN v. … In Haynes v. Wash- BROWN v.
Cited 82 timesPublished504 F.3d 903 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 26, 2007
The doctrine originated in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 350-52 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). … And in Patrick v. Burget, the Court analyzed a state-authorized, but privately-run, medical review board that allegedly restricted competition among doctors. 486 U.S. at 99-106, 108 S.Ct. 1658 .
Cited 355 timesPublished41 F. 698 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · Mar 22, 1890
In the Guard patent we find V- *701 formed grooves encircling the hub near the ends of the mortises, which are designed to receive the spokes. … The reservation also distinguishes this case from Smith v. Vulcanite Co., 93 U. S. 486 , which was cited for complainant as analogous, but does not apply.
Cited 1 timesPublished609 F.3d 467 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 2010
07-3356-cv Brown v. … Brown v. Kelly, 244 F.R.D. 222, 225 5 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
Cited 172 timesPublished518 F.3d 552 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 4, 2008
Brown, 353 F.3d at 1040 (citing Fruit v. … See Scott v.
Cited 118 timesPublished567 F.3d 191 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 2009
See, e.g., Knowles v. … State v. Brown, 2004 WL 1277498 , at *13, 16 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Brown’s objections to the district court’s denial of habeas relief on this ground are meritless.
Cited 388 timesPublished585 F.3d 1202 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 30, 2009
In Yee v. … Turner v.
Cited 32 timesPublished510 F.3d 870 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 4, 2007
BROWN, Acting Warden, San Quentin State Prison, Respondent. … Two of the men had blond hair and the third man had sandy brown hair. (8/25/04 HRT 48.)
Cited 183 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Government
788 F.3d 537 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 2015
In San Manuel, the Board noted three exceptions to the Tuscarora princi- *542 pie, which were first enumerated by the Ninth Circuit in Donovan v. … Moreover, federal Indian law and policy are areas over which the Board has no particular expertise, and so we need not defer to the Board’s conclusions with respect to them. Cf. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v.
Disagreed with by Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort v. National Labor Relations Board, 791 F.3d 648 (2015)Cited 6 timesPublishedMedtronic, Inc. v. Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L.
69 F.4th 1341 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 5, 2023
v. … According to Medtronic, the Board’s reasoning conflicts with our deci- sion in Intel Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHyatt v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
904 F.3d 1361 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 24, 2018
Hyatt to appeal the rejections to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Upon an applicant’s filing of an HYATT v. … Rules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interfer- ences in Ex Parte Appeals, 76 Fed. Reg. 72,287 (Nov. 22, 2011).
Cited 11 timesPublished681 F.3d 1351 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 7, 2012
Because the Board misinterpreted our previous decision in Harari v. Hollmer, 602 F.3d 1348 (Fed. … HOLLMER v.
Cited 11 timesPublished19 F. Cas. 718 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1870
Earle v. Sawyer Case No. 4,247]. … For other cases involving this patent, see Piper v. Moon. Case No. 11,182: Piper v. Moon, 91 U. S. 44 ; Piper v. Brown, Case No. 11,181.] Charles F.
Cited 1 timesPublished320 F. Supp. 3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 1, 2018
See Allen v. Brown , 185 F.Supp.3d at 6 . … See Allen v. Brown , 185 F.Supp.3d at 6-7 . B.
Cited 7 timesPublished5 Indian Terr. 361 · Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · Oct 19, 1904
Houston vs Will Brown et al. Demurrer to complaint sustained. … Brown et al. Order granting appeal. On motion of plaintiff, A. C.
Cited 2 timesPublished575 F.3d 322 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 31, 2009
v. … See Doe v. Am. Red Cross, 14 F.3d 196 , 199 (3d Cir.1993); Hunt v. Acromed Corp., 961 F.2d 1079, 1081 (3d Cir.1992); see also Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069, 1078 (5th Cir.1984).
Cited 149 timesPublished45 F. 291 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · Feb 10, 1891
Stowel v. Zouch, 1 Plowd. 361; Wrotesley v. Adams, Id. 195; Wiltshire v. James, 1 Dyer, 59a; Perk. § 625. … In Munn v. Worrall, 53 N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLoera v. Kingsville Indep Sch Dist
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 22, 2025
Mason v. Lafayette City-Par. Consol. Gov’t, 806 F.3d 268, 280 (5th Cir. 2015) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)). … Brown v. Bryan County, 219 F.3d 450, 457 (5th Cir. 2000) (quoting Brown, 520 U.S. at 410). “A showing of simple or even heightened negligence will not suffice.” Brown, 520 U.S. at 407.
Cited 0 timesPublished39 F.3d 324 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 21, 1994
39 F.3d 324 Mauro v. Brown & Brown, Inc. NO. 93-3528 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Oct 21, 1994 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2 REVERSED AND VACATED.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna