Case law

Ison v. Brown

140 S. Ct. 483 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 4, 2019

Brown & Root, Inc. v. Sain

162 F.3d 813 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 18, 1998

The Benefits Review Board (“Board”) affirmed the award in all respects. Brown & Root and its insurer, Highlands Insurance Company, now bring this appeal. II. … Therefore, because Sain provided notice of the settlements to Brown & Root, we affirm the Board’s ruling that the forfeiture provision of section 33(g) was inapplicable. C.

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. Murphy

823 F.3d 622 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · May 18, 2016

KBR subcon- 1 Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. Dep’t of the Army, ASBCA No. 58492, 14-1 BCA ¶35,713 (“Board Op.”). KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES v. … KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT SERVICES v.

Brown v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.

299 F. 463 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 10, 1924

An explosion immediately resulted, causing injuries to young Brown, for which damages are here sought. The explosion was caused by gas which had accumulated in the hole. … Pulaski Gaslight Co. v. McClintock, 97 Ark. 576 , 134 S. W. 1189, 1199 , 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 825; Triple State Natural Gas Co. v. Wellman, 114 Ky. 79 , 70 S. W. 49 , 1 Ann. Cas. 64; Sipple v.

Brown v. Davis

140 S. Ct. 173 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 2019

Brown v. Washington

140 S. Ct. 186 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 2019

Brown v. California

140 S. Ct. 190 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 2019

Brown v. Luther

140 S. Ct. 272 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 2019

Brown v. Newsome

469 U.S. 1098 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 10, 1984

United States v. Henry Stuart Brown

511 F.2d 920 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 20, 1975

We do not think that what was said in United States v. … United States v. Super, 492 F.2d 319, 323 (2d Cir. 1974).

United States v. Demetrius Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 20, 2009

Brown appeals, arguing that the district court had authority to reduce his sentence below the amended Guidelines range and erred by not doing so. His argument, however, is foreclosed by United States v. … United States v. Forman, 553 F.3d 585, 590 (7th Cir. 2009); United States v. Olden, No. 08-5060, 2008 WL 4596336, at *3 (10th Cir. Oct. 15, 2008); United States v.

Brown v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

738 F.3d 926 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 31, 2013

Thus, Brown’s “proposed plaintiff class” was greater than 100 members. See Law Offices of K.C. Okoli, P.C. v. BNB Bank, N.A., 481 F. … We do not address Brown’s arguments, however, because she failed to meaningfully argue them in her opening brief, Ahlberg v.

Taylor v. Brown

140 S. Ct. 406 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 15, 2019

Brown v. Metzger

140 S. Ct. 873 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 13, 2020

Brown Paper Mill Co. v. Irvin

134 F.2d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 1, 1943

Irvin, brought this action against the Brown Paper Mill Company, Inc., the appellant, upon the claim that he was the procuring cause of a contract for the purchase by it from J. L. … Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co. v. Lombard, 8 Cir., 132 F. 721, 734 ; Becker v. Evens & Howard Sewer Pipe Co., 8 Cir., 70 F.2d 596, 598 ; McGee v. Nee, 8 Cir., 113 F.2d 543, 546 ; Knaust Bros., Inc., v.

Saylor v. Brown

140 S. Ct. 214 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 2019

Brown v. Pennsylvania

140 S. Ct. 295 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 7, 2019

Schachter v. Brown

93 F. App'x 320 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 1, 2004

“A complaint will be dismissed as ‘frivolous’ when ‘it is clear that the defendants are immune from suit.’ ” Montero v. Travis, 171 F.3d 757, 760 (2d Cir.1999) (quoting Neitzke v. … See Moccio v. New York State Office of Court Admin., 95 F.3d 195, 198 (2d Cir.1996); see also Fed.

Emory Newton Brown v. United States

256 F.2d 151 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 23, 1958

Williamson v. Hardwick, D.C.N.D.Ga. 1955, 135 F.Supp. 463 , affirmed 5 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 168 ; United States v. Howell, D.C.S.D.W.Va.1952, 103 F.Supp. 714 , affirmed 4 Cir., 1952, 199 F.2d 366 . See McNally v. … If the Parole Board, when the appellant has become eligible, refuses to consider him for parole by reason of the contempt conviction he will not then be without a remedy. McNally v. Hill, supra.

Brown v. Kelley

469 F.2d 1405 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 29, 1972

469 F.2d 1405 Brown v. Kelley * ** No. 72-2971 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Dec. 29, 1972 1 M.D.Fla. * Summary Calendar cases; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. … B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966