Case law

Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

79 F.2d 73 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 31, 1935

It is for the Board of Tax Appeals to determine from the facts before it whether the particular transaction is essentially equivalent to a taxable dividend. Commissioner v. Babson (C. C. … We find no error in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Board of Tax Appeals. The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Robert Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

817 F.3d 1225 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 21, 2016

Brown and Vogler concede that these statements were erroneous. … See Simon v.

United States v. Bernard Nettles Brown

699 F.2d 704 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 22, 1983

United States v. Anderson, 574 F.2d 1347, 1352 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 384 (1981). Furthermore, in view of Brown’s *710 counsel’s cross-examination of Ms. … Brown’s claim of multiplicitous counts is rejected. V.

United States v. Charles E. Brown

348 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 8, 1965

Brown was in a section of the detectives’ room. Mr. … It is urged that the rule of Bridges v.

United States v. George F. Brown

574 F.2d 1274 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 10, 1978

Brown, was indicted by a Federal Grand Jury in Baton Rouge, Louisiana for receiving $15,000 from Dixie Brewing Company in 1974 and $15,-000 from Falstaff Brewing Company in 1975, in connection with the passage of legislation … In United States v.

Davis v. Brown

94 U.S. 423 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 16, 1877

The doctrine of Walton v. Shelley maintained its position in the courts of England only for a few years. In 1798, it was by the same court overruled in the case of Jordaine v. … These considerations dispose of the objection to the competency of the witness Brown. The notes of •McOmber were never put into circulation by the Ocean National Bank.

Ilene L. Ackelson v. Gloria Brown

264 F.2d 543 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 25, 1959

Brown’s car. I was not watching my rear view mirror at the time and had no warning of an impending collision. … Thomas V.

Brown v. Smart

145 U.S. 454 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 2, 1892

Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122 ; Ogden v. Saunders, 12 Wheat. 213 ; Baldwin v. Hale, 1 Wall. 223 ; Gilman v. Lockwood, 4 Wall. 409 . … Smith v. Union Bank, 5 Pet. 518, 526; Crapo v. Kelly, 16 Wall. 610, 630 ; Denny v. Bennett, 128 U. S. 489, 498 ; Walworth v. Harris, 129 U. S. 355 ; Geilinger v. Philippi, 133 U. S. 246, 257 ; Pullman’s Car Co. v.

Brown v. Massachusetts

144 U.S. 573 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 18, 1892

Commonwealth v. Edwards, 12 Cush. 187 ; Carter v. Bennett, 15 How. 354 . … The case cannot be distinguished in principle from Baldwin v. Kansas, 129 U. S. 52 . Writ of error dismissed for wa/nt of jurisdiction.

Brown-Heckstall v. U.S. Government

105 F. App'x 277 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 17, 2004

Memphis v. Brown

94 U.S. 715 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 23, 1877

Under the ruling in Brockett v. … Sage et al. v. Central Railroad Company of Iowa et al., 98 U. S. 412 .

Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

218 F.2d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 30, 1954

In this the Board’s designation of the unit differs from its determination of the majority control of a union. As to the latter, the Board in Celanese *544 Corp v. … Of this the Supreme Court said in the last sentence of Brooks v.

United States v. Gregory Brown, Jr.

994 F.3d 147 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Apr 13, 2021

Ball v. United States, 163 U.S. 662, 672 (1896); accord Burks v. … United States v. Coleman, 862 F.2d 455, 458 (3d Cir. 1988) (quoting Downum v. United States, 372 U.S. 734, 736 (1963)). Brown invites us to extend the Kennedy exception beyond the mistrial context.

Brown v. Hiatts

82 U.S. 177 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 10, 1873

In the case of Hoare v. … Justice Washington, in Conn v.

Interstate Banking & Trust Co. v. Brown

235 F. 32 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 20, 1916

Union Trust Co. v. Trumbull, 137 Ill. 146 , 27 N. … Stewart v. Phœnix Co., 9 Lea (77 Tenn.) 104, applies the rule of estoppel against the warehouseman, and touches no other rights. Bank v.

Andrew Brown v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent

283 F.3d 492 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 13, 2002

See People v. Brown, 242 A.D.2d 730 , 664 N.Y.S.2d 929 (2d Dep’t 1997) {“Brown I”). As to his other claims, the Appellate Division stated that “[Brown’s] remaining contentions are without merit.” Id. … On November 24, 1997, the New York Court of Appeals denied Brown’s motion for leave to appeal. People v. Brown, 91 N.Y.2d 833 , 690 N.E.2d 495 , 667 N.Y.S.2d 686 (1997).

United States v. Richard C. Brown

899 F.2d 94 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Mar 26, 1990

See United States v. Chase, 894 F.2d 488, 490-91 (1st Cir.1990); United States v. Aguilar-Pena, 887 F.2d 347, 350 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Spreckels v. Brown

212 U.S. 208 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 1, 1909

This is an action of ejectment brought by the defendant in error, Brown. He had a verdict and judgment, subject to exceptions. … Pray v. Pierce, 7 Massachusetts, 381; Russel v. Coffin, 8 Pick. 143 , 153; Freeman v. McGaw, 15 Pick. 82 , *211 86, 87. See Moelle v. Sherwood, 148 U. S. 21, 28 .

United States v. Dois Edward Brown

449 F.3d 741 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 31, 2006

United States v. … See also United States v.

Brown v. Lakhani Hospitality

602 F. App'x 348 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 11, 2015

We construe the evidence and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Brown. See Carter v. Chi. State Univ., 778 F.3d 651, 657 (7th Cir.2015). … See Anderson v. Hardman, 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir.2001).