Case law

Bockes v. Fields

999 F.2d 788 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 26, 1993

Under Monell v. … Spell v. McDaniel, 824 F.2d 1380, 1386 (4th Cir.1987).

Barreda v. Brown

180 F. 194 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · May 12, 1910

In October, 1901, the Browns wrote Mr. … “Very truly yours, Alexander Brown & Sons.” Finally Barreda wrote the Browns as follows: “28 Avenue Hoche, “Paris, 12 June, 1906. “Messrs. Alexander Brown & Sons, Baltimore.

Story v. Rives

97 F.2d 182 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1938

An indeterminate sentence is one for the maximum period imposed by the court, subject to termination by the Parole Board at any time after service of the minimum period. In United States ex rel. Paladino v. … (N.S.) 931, 20 Ann.Cas. 1217; Commonwealth v. Brown, 167 Mass. 144 , 45 N.E. 1 ; Commonwealth v. Kalck, 239 Pa. 533 , 87 A. 61 ; Woods v. State, 130 Tenn. 100 , 169 S.W. 558 , L.R.A. 1915F, 531 ; State v.

Hamilton v. Brown

630 F.3d 889 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 4, 2011

Code Regs. §§ 3268(a)(1), 3025(j). 282 HAMILTON v. BROWN B. … HAMILTON v. BROWN 283 lar state laws have been upheld, in this and other circuits, with respect to state prison inmates. E.g., Rise v.

Pickup v. Brown

740 F.3d 1208 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 29, 2013

Peifer v. Brown

106 F. 938 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1901

Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phœnix Iron Co., 95 U. S. 274 , 24 L. Ed. 344 ; Railroad Co. v. Mellon, 104 U. S. 112 , 26 L. Ed. 639 ; Knapp v. Morss, 150. U. S. 221, 14 Sup. Ct. 81, 37 L. Ed. 1059 ; Morgan Envelope Co. v. … McClain v. Ortmayer, 141 U. S. 419 , 12 Sup. Ct. 76, 35 L. Ed. 800 ; Lewis v. Steel Co., 17 U. S. App. 296, 8 C. C. A. 41 , 59 Fed. 129 .

Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. Chapman

814 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 2016

v. … Brown v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters

826 F.3d 460 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 21, 2016

RESPONDENT v. … We “may consider only the Board’s own reasons, not the rationalizations of counsel.” Charlotte Amphitheater Corp. v. NLRB, 82 F.3d 1074, 1080 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citing SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 95 (1943)).

Board of Education v. Brown

531 U.S. 958 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 30, 2000

Sufi Network Services, Inc. v. United States

755 F.3d 1305 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · May 29, 2014

v. … v.

Brown v. Ahern

676 F.3d 899 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 12, 2012

BROWN v. AHERN 3977 II [1] In Carden v. Montana, we applied the abstention doc- trine of Younger v. … See id. at 824, 832. 3980 BROWN v.

National Labor Relations Board v. M. H. Brown Company, Inc.

441 F.2d 839 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 1971

On January 21, Brown filed with the Board a representation petition seeking an election under section 9(c) (1) (B) of the Act. … Given this, it is mere quibbling to say that Brown never asked for a response in writing before. The Board cites Colecraft Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 385 F.2d 998 (2d Cir. 1967).

Brown v. Astrue

649 F.3d 193 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 6, 2011

See Kertesz v. … See Adorno v.

Brown v. Allebach

166 F. 488 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1908

Brown, Receiver, v. Morton, 71 N. J. Law, 26, 58 Atl. 95 ; Campbell v. American Alkali Co., 125 Fed. 207 , 61 C. C. A. 317 . See, also, Cook on Corporations, § 3-19. 3. … The original subscriber was held liable for the assessment on the stock, although he was not the owner at the time; and the same court, in Brown, Receiver, v. Morton, 71 N. J.

Retail Store Employees Union, Local 400 v. National Labor Relations Board

360 F.2d 494 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 13, 1965

The Board's inference should also rest upon some findings. This is underscored by the place accorded to findings of a trial examiner in Universal Camera Corp. v. … See Burlington Truck Lines v. United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167 , 83 S.Ct. 239 , 9 L.Ed.2d 207 , recently cited in Judge Washington's dissenting opinion in Texaco, Inc. v.

United States v. Shalynda Harris

197 F.3d 870 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 30, 1999

FCC, 721 F.2d 667, 670 (9th Cir.1983); Brown v. Sibley, 650 F.2d 760, 765-66 (5th Cir.1981). In City of Cleburne v. … Brown v. North Carolina, 479 U.S. 940, 940 , 107 S.Ct. 423 , 93 L.Ed.2d 373 (1986) (O’Connor, J., concurring in denial of cer-tiorari).

Tarlock Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

771 F.3d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 13, 2014

Singh appealed the IJ’s decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board), and the Board dismissed Singh’s appeal, making Singh subject to an administratively final order of removal. See Ocampo v. … Next, the Board reasoned that, although Yauri had filed a motion to reopen and continue her  SINGH V.

Fleming v. Bayou Steel

83 F.4th 278 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 27, 2023

In Borst v. … ,” they never “occupied the majority of the Board.”

May v. McDonough

61 F.4th 963 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Mar 6, 2023

Brown, 37 F.3d 618, 620 (Fed. … Rsch. & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 76 (D.C. Cir. 1984). The government cites decisions denying Veterans Court jurisdiction in the absence of a Board final decision, viz, Breeden v. Principi, 17 Vet.

Brown v. French

80 F. 166 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · Apr 13, 1897

In the case of Barber v. … In City of Boston v.