Case law

Dawud Halisi Malik v. Neal Brown

16 F.3d 330 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 1994

Hobbie v. … Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Brown contends that Malik has insisted that he be allowed to use his Islamic name exclusively. We cannot agree.

United States v. Douglas William Brown

761 F.2d 1272 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 1985

V Brown also contends that the district court’s failure to give his requested instructions concerning lesser-included offenses was erroneous, requiring reversal and a new trial. … United States v. Grayson, 438 U.S. 41, 54-55 , 98 S.Ct. 2610, 2617-2618 , 57 L.Ed.2d 582 (1978); United States v.

South Prairie Construction Co. v. Local No. 627, International Union of Operating Engineers

425 U.S. 800 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 24, 1976

NLRB v. Metropolitan Ins. Co., 380 U. S. 438, 444 (1965). … As this Court stated in NLRB v. Food Store Employees, 417 U.

United States v. Winford Earl Brown

899 F.2d 677 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 12, 1990

In making his arguments, Brown relies on Boykin v. … See Brim v.

Brown v. Department of Defense

163 F. App'x 861 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Dec 12, 2005

Brown (“Brown”) 30 days to either submit a revised Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) form indicating that she “waives review of any discrimination issues or informs the court that she wishes to proceed in a district court”. … The court received Brown’s Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) form on December 5, 2005. Brown neither selected statement # 2 on the form waiving her discrimination claim, nor requested that her case be transferred to a district court.

Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co. v. Brown

114 F. 939 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 21, 1902

Brown did not induce it to make this, choice. … Co. v. Southern Tel. Co. (C. C.) 34 Fed. 795, 802 ; Edison Electric Eight Co. v. Sawyer-Man Electric Eight Co., 3 C. C. A. 605 , 53 Fed. 592 ; Green v. Barney (C. C.) 19 Fed. 420 ; Norton v. Can Co. (C.

Magruder v. Brown

106 F.2d 1004 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 29, 1939

Alicia Brown v. Nexus Business Solutions, LLC

29 F.4th 1315 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 1, 2022

Hogan v. Allstate Ins. Co., 361 F.3d 621, 627 (11th Cir. 2004). … See Ahle v. Veracity Rsch. Co., 738 F. Supp. 2d 896, 908 (D. Minn. 2010); see also Calderon v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co., 917 F. Supp. 2d 428, 442 (D. Md. 2012).

Brown v. Foltz

754 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 1984

754 F.2d 372 Brown v. Foltz 84-1314 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 12/13/84 E.D.Mich., 583 F.Supp. 1063 AFFIRMED

Overnite Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 728, Intervenor

140 F.3d 259 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 1998

Eastern, Inc. v. … Although the courts can reverse the Board for an unexplained failure to draw the inference, see, e.g., NLRB v. Selwyn Shoe Mfg. Corp., 428 F.2d 217, 225 (8th Cir.1970); NLRB v.

Barnett v. Brown

174 F. App'x 380 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 10, 2006

See Special Investments Inc. v. Aero Air, 360 F.3d 989 , 993 (9th Cir.2004); Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 895 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc); Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp., 320 F.3d 989, 998 (9th Cir.2003).

Brown v. General Electric Co.

733 F.2d 1085 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 8, 1984

The complaint alleges that General Electric originally sold the fryer to MacDonald's Corp. on December 13, 1974, and that the Browns acquired it in May of 1979. … Brown v. General Electric Co., 584 F.Supp. 1305 (E.D.N.C.1983). AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Jones

171 F. App'x 40 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 2006

Brown’s only evidence was his own contrary opinion regarding the appropriate course of medical treatment. Consequently, Brown failed to raise any genuine issue of material fact. See Sanchez v. … The district court acted within its discretion to deny Brown’s motions to appoint counsel because Brown showed no exceptional circumstances. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015,1017 (9th Cir.1991).

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Brown

69 F.2d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 22, 1934

The Board held that the transaction was not within section 201 (g), and the Board has held similarly in several other eases; Rorimer v. Com’r, 27 B. T. A. 871; Babson v. Com’r, 27 B. T. A. 859; Champion v. Com’r, 27 B. … The Commissioner relies upon three holdings of the Board upon this question. Ilun-toon v. Com’r, supra; Robinson v. Com’r, 27 B. T.

Sanders v. Brown

167 F. App'x 631 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 16, 2006

. § 2254 (d)(1); Boyd v.

Licklider v. Brown

12 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 14, 1926

R. 86; Moore Bros. v. Cowan, 173 Ala. 536 , 55 So. 903 , 26 Am. Bankr. R. 902, 907. … In the ease of Moore Bros. v.

United States v. Norbert A. Brown

635 F.2d 1207 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 27, 1981

In support of this contention Brown relies primarily on Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 , 99 S.Ct. 2586 , 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979), and United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). … A Initially we note that the search of the trunk of Brown’s automobile was lawful if the officers had probable cause for the search. In Arkansas v.

United States v. Cynthia Brown

628 F.2d 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 28, 1980

In Wong Sun v. … Accord, Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 602 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975); United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268, 276 , 98 S.Ct. 1054, 1060 , 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978); United States v.

O'Keefe v. Brown

96 F.2d 772 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 13, 1938

Bank of Orangeburg v. Bryant, 4 Cir., 72 F.2d 917 . The instant case has been discussed from the standpoint of whether a trust relation was created. … Instead of this, Brown Brothers issued their letter of credit relying upon the contract of the bank to pay Brown Brothers as the latter made advancements on the letter of credit.

United States v. Corey D. Brown

72 F.3d 96 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 28, 1995

Brown relies on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. … Reviewing this constitutional challenge de novo, United States v. Johnson, 56 F.3d 947, 953 (8th Cir.1995), we reject Brown’s argument.