Case law

Fleming v. Brown

162 F.2d 409 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 3, 1947

Every question presented by the appeal at bar must be decided in favor of the appellant by reason of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking and Lumber Co. and Raley v.

Brown v. American Honda Motor Co.

939 F.2d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 23, 1991

Birmingham Board of Education, 648 F.2d 950, 954 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981); Crawford v. Western Electric Co., 614 F.2d 1300, 1309 (5th Cir.1980). … Fowler v. Blue Bell, Inc., 737 F.2d 1007, 1011 (11th Cir.1984). Brown suggests that Honda’s deviation from its own manual clearly indicates that the reasons Honda put forth were pretextual.

Alston v. Brown

161 F. App'x 10 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 2005

See Antonelli v. U.S. … Prellwitz v. Berg, 578 F.2d 190, 192 (7th Cir.1978) (quoting Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 , 788 n. 5, 93 S.Ct. 1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973)).

Brown v. Norris

175 F. App'x 780 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 12, 2006

We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma *781 pauperis, and we remand to the district court. We review de novo a district court’s determination of qualifying strikes. See Rivera v. … Jorgenson, No. 5:98CV00245, and Brown v. Mobley, No. 4:01CV00302—do not count as strikes.

United States v. William Arthur Brown

202 F.3d 691 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 2000

Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 279 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993); United States v. … United States v.

United States v. Robert Nathaniel Brown

500 F.2d 375 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 18, 1974

. §§ 495 and 1708, Robert Nathaniel Brown initially pleaded not guilty to both counts. … Robert Nathaniel Brown, Criminal No. 73-0167. THE COURT: Anything you wish to say, Mr. [prosecutor].

Brown v. Booker

790 F.2d 83 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 12, 1986

790 F.2d 83 Brown v. Booker 85-7031 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. 5/12/86 E.D.Va., 622 F.Supp. 993 CPC DENIED--DISMISSED

Brown v. Beacom

174 F. 812 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 4, 1909

Brown, Buena W. Brown, and the defendant, Beacom, and for an accounting. … See Bradley v. Rhines, 3 Wall. 393 , 19 L. Ed. 467 ; Plant v. R. Co., 152 U. S. 71 , 14 Sup. Ct. 483, 38 L. Ed. 358 ; New Orleans v. Benjamin, 153 U. S. 411 , 14 Sup. Ct. 905, 38 L. Ed. 764 ; R. Co. v. Davidson, 157 U.

United States v. Brown

633 F. App'x 785 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 7, 2016

Donet, Jr., appointed counsel for Terrance Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. … Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Brown v. City of Upper Arlington

637 F.3d 668 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 25, 2011

Had the City honored No. 09-4396 Brown v. … Had Brown refiled the state law No. 09-4396 Brown v.

United States v. Wendell Brown

795 F.3d 924 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 7, 2015

This court previously affirmed Wendell Terrell Brown’s sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). See United States v. Brown, 734 F.3d 824 (8th Cir. 2013). … . § 1291, this court vacates Brown’s sentence and remands. Brown pled guilty to possessing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).

United States v. Riddick Brown

285 F.2d 528 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 9, 1961

Brown v. Harkins

131 F. 63 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 12, 1904

Greenleaf on Evidence, § 558; Simpson v. Dall, 3 Wall. 460 , 18 L. Ed. 265 ; Improvement & R. R. Co. v. Munson, 14 Wall. 442 , 20 L. Ed. 867 ; Weatherhead’s Lessee v. Baskerville et al., 11 How. 360 , 13 L. … In Riggs v. Tayloe, 4 Wheat. 486 , 6 L.

Brown v. Foltz

754 F.2d 372 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 13, 1984

754 F.2d 372 Brown v. Foltz 84-1314 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. 12/13/84 E.D.Mich., 583 F.Supp. 1063 AFFIRMED

Brown v. Department of Defense

163 F. App'x 861 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Dec 12, 2005

Brown (“Brown”) 30 days to either submit a revised Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) form indicating that she “waives review of any discrimination issues or informs the court that she wishes to proceed in a district court”. … The court received Brown’s Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) form on December 5, 2005. Brown neither selected statement # 2 on the form waiving her discrimination claim, nor requested that her case be transferred to a district court.

United States v. Norbert A. Brown

635 F.2d 1207 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 27, 1981

In support of this contention Brown relies primarily on Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753 , 99 S.Ct. 2586 , 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979), and United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). … A Initially we note that the search of the trunk of Brown’s automobile was lawful if the officers had probable cause for the search. In Arkansas v.

Willie Frank Brown v. United States

314 F.2d 293 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 18, 1963

BROWNING, Circuit Judge. Appellant was convicted of transporting Betty Joyce Lanuzza from Seattle, Washington, to Richmond, California, for the purpose of prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2421 . … United States v. Taylor, 303 F.2d 165, 169 (4th Cir., 1962). As the court held in Taylor, and as we indicated in Eddy v.

Barnett v. Brown

174 F. App'x 380 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 10, 2006

See Special Investments Inc. v. Aero Air, 360 F.3d 989 , 993 (9th Cir.2004); Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 895 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc); Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp., 320 F.3d 989, 998 (9th Cir.2003).

Board of Trade v. Ellis

122 F. 319 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · Mar 30, 1903

following the Chicago Board of Trade, from the same sympathy that makes the Open Board of Trade quotations identical with those of the Chicago Board of Trade. … quotations from the Chicago Board of Trade, because they would get the identical quotations at the identical instant of time from the Open Board of Trade.

Brown v. Jones

171 F. App'x 40 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 2006

Brown’s only evidence was his own contrary opinion regarding the appropriate course of medical treatment. Consequently, Brown failed to raise any genuine issue of material fact. See Sanchez v. … The district court acted within its discretion to deny Brown’s motions to appoint counsel because Brown showed no exceptional circumstances. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015,1017 (9th Cir.1991).