Case law

Brown v. Valenzuela

324 F. App'x 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 2009

Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm. … The district court properly dismissed the action because Brown failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he suffered an actual injury as a result of defendant’s conduct. See Lewis v.

Brown v. Palmateer

202 F. App'x 234 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 2006

See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1273 (9th Cir.2005). … Although Brown conceives of a more specific argument that could have been raised, his attorney’s argument fell within the “wide range of reasonable professional assistance.” Strickland, v.

Walker Patent Pivoted Bin Co. v. Brown

110 F. 649 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1901

Brown v. Tucker

566 U.S. 998 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 14, 2012

Pharmanex v. Shalala

221 F.3d 1151 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jul 21, 2000

See FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 120 S.Ct. 1291, 1300 (2000). … In Brown v. Gardner , 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994), the Supreme Court observed that “[a]mbiguity is a creature not of definitional possibilities but of statutory context.”

Moll v. Brown & Root Inc.

218 F.3d 472 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 24, 2000

In KSLA-TV, Inc. v. … Conversely, in Cosse v.

Southeastern Maritime Co. v. Brown

121 F.3d 648 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Sep 10, 1997

Alonzo BROWN and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation, United States Department of Labor, Respondents. Sept. 10, 1997. … Dept. of Labor v. Hamilton, 890 F.2d 1143 (11th Cir.1989) ("[W]e must affirm the decision of the Benefits Review Board unless this court, sitting en banc, overrules Holliday.").

Brown v. Valenzuela

324 F. App'x 686 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 29, 2009

Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm. … The district court properly dismissed the action because Brown failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he suffered an actual injury as a result of defendant’s conduct. See Lewis v.

Richard Anderson Photography v. Brown

852 F.2d 114 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 20, 1988

Anderson then brought this action against Radford, its governing board, and Brown, alleging such a violation and seeking in-junctive and monetary relief. … The district court dismissed the claims against Radford, its Board, and Brown insofar as she was sued in her official capacity.

Grant v. Brown

312 F. App'x 71 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 12, 2009

Boyde v. … Under Strickland v.

Brown v. Haney

566 U.S. 948 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 16, 2012

Brown v. LaCreek Electric Ass'n

939 F.2d 623 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 26, 1991

See e.g., Underwood v. Colonial Penn Insurance Co., 888 F.2d 588, 590-91 (8th Cir.1989). We see no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s action.

Brown v. Bledsoe

367 F. App'x 294 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 22, 2010

legality of Brown’s detention, and thus it dismissed the § 2241 petition notwithstanding Brown’s various claims of “actual innocence.” … To the extent that Brown needs a certificate of appealability to pursue this appeal, it is denied. Reasonable jurists could not debate the District Court's decision to dismiss Brown's petition. See Slack v.

Honesto v. Brown

566 U.S. 997 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 14, 2012

Brown v. City of Oneonta

195 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 26, 1999

They asked for his identification card, passed it around, and returned it to Brown. At one point, the officers “formed a circle around” Brown. … See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 106 F.3d 1125 (2d Cir.1997). Accordingly, those claims are no longer part of this case. .

Brown v. Gonzales

187 F. App'x 691 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 2006

MEMORANDUM ** Douglas Brown, a native and citizen of Sierra Leone, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) decision that he is ineligible for asylum or other relief because he has no well-founded … Shah v. INS, 220 F.3d 1062, 1067 (9th Cir.2000). Because the BIA found Brown credible, we take his testimony as true. Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646 , 652 n. 3 (9th Cir.2000).

Brown & Sharpe Co. v. Wahl

85 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 23, 1936

Co. v. Wahl (C.C.A.) 27 F.(2d) 635 ; Wahl v. N. E. Norstrom Electric Mfg. Co. (D.C.) 19 F.(2d) 544 ; Norstrom v. Wahl (C.C.A.) 27 F.(2d) 637 ; Norstrom v. Wahl (C.C.A.) 39 F.(2d) 791 ; Norstrom v. … In Norstrom v.

Brown v. Beard

371 F. App'x 257 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Mar 22, 2010

See White v. … E.g., San Filippo v. Bongiovanni, 30 F.3d 424, 432 (3d Cir.1994) (citation omitted). See also St. Surin v.

Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Brown

84 F.2d 433 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 12, 1936

Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. … Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry.

Brown v. Bledsoe

366 F. App'x 326 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 22, 2010

Brown's appeal from the final order in Civ. No. 09-cv-01436 was docketed in this Court as C.A. No. 09-4487. . To the extent that Brown needs a certificate of appealability to pursue this appeal, it is denied. … Reasonable jurists could not debate the District Court's decision to dismiss Brown's petition. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 , 120 S.Ct. 1595 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).