Case law

Brown v. Hickman

279 F. App'x 573 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 27, 2008

As a threshold matter, we reject the state’s contention that Brown’s claim was procedurally defaulted under In re Dixon, 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 , 264 P.2d 513 (1953). See Park v. … Brown’s request that we remand to the district court to reopen discovery and to conduct an evidentiary hearing is denied. See Sims v. Brown, 425 F.3d 560, 577 (9th Cir.2005). AFFIRMED.

Richardson v. Town of Eastover

922 F.2d 1152 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 14, 1991

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See also Brown v. South Carolina State Bd. of Educ., 391 S.E.2d 866, 867 (S.C.1990) (a teacher certificate necessary for employment is a protected property interest).

United States v. Gregory Brown

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Nov 4, 2014

________________ No. 13-4442 ________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. … GREGORY GARRETT BROWN, Appellant ________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

Brown & Root, Inc. v. United States. United States v. Brown & Root, Inc.

198 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 27, 1952

Wheeler v. Glazer, supra; Austin Road Co. v. Pope, 147 Tex. 430 , 216 S.W.2d 563 . This latter test, as stated in Wheeler v. … Lottman v. Cuilla, Tex.Com.App., 288 S.W. 123 . In Union Bus Lines v.

Vail v. Brown

39 F.3d 208 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Nov 2, 1994

Gartland, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs- Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Jesse BROWN, or his successor, Secretary of the Department of Veteran's Affairs, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. … See Vail v. Derwinski, 946 F.2d 589 (1991) as amended, 956 F.2d 812 (8th Cir.1992).

Brown v. Huntington Piano Co.

134 F. 735 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 6, 1904

The criticism of complainant’s expert is sound: “Its link connection introduces features which are objectionable, and are-entirely eliminated by the [Brown] construction with its disconnected lever. … We are entirely satisfied that Brown was the first to devise a suitable connection between the Boston fall-board and the music desk, which connection does the work without introducing some objectionable element or feature

National Labor Relations Board v. Christian Board of Publication

113 F.2d 678 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 25, 1940

Labor Board v. Falk Corp., 308 U.S. 453, 461 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 ; Labor Board v. Greyhound Lines, 303 U.S. 261, 271 , 58 S.Ct. 571 , 82 L.Ed. 831 , 115 A.L.R. 307 ; Labor Board v. Waterman S. S. … See Swift & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 10 Cir., 106 F.2d 87, 93 ; National Labor Relations Board v. American Mfg.

Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Association v. Dan Morales, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas

975 F.2d 1178 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 30, 1992

Board of Levee Comm’rs of the Orleans Levee Board v. Huls, 852 F.2d 140 , 143 (5th Cir.1988). … City of Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U.S. 182, 185 , 43 S.Ct. 534, 536 , 67 L.Ed. 937 (1923). . Town of Mount Pleasant v. Beckwith, 100 U.S. 514, 524 , 25 L.Ed. 699 (1880). . City of Pawhuska v.

United States v. Dereck Jerome Brown

805 F.3d 1325 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Nov 20, 2015

Because Brown was an armed career criminal, the PSR applied the ACCA enhancement to increase Brown’s recommended total offense level from 28 to 34 and to increase his recommended criminal history category from V to VI. … United States v. Irey, 612 F.3d 1160, 1190 (11th Cir. 2010) (en banc). Brown’s arguments leave us with no such conviction. AFFIRMED. 7

Avery v. Brown

11 F. App'x 742 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 2001

See Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam). … See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104-06 , 97 S.Ct. 285 , 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Jackson v. McIntosh, 90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir.1996).

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 25, 2005

IV; see Mapp v. … UNITED STATES v.

Brown v. Oregon King Min. Co.

110 F. 728 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · Aug 9, 1901

If Brown had failed to comply with the law, and the property was at the time subject to location, it was wholly immaterial whether Wilson knew of Brown’s prior claim. He might lawfully locate a claim himself. … He was not seeking to acquire the claim in violation of Brown’s right, since it is conceded that Brown at the time had no right.

Rippy v. Brown

352 U.S. 878 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 22, 1956

Brown v. Pugh

278 F. App'x 975 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 27, 2008

See Alba v. Montford, 517 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir.2008).

Brown v. Peake

269 F. App'x 956 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 11, 2008

ORDER The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to the court’s November 20, 2007 order and requests that the court summarily affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in Brown v … Milton Brown has not responded. This case was stayed pending the court’s disposition in Sanders v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 881 (Fed.Ch-.2007) and its companion case Simmons v. Nicholson, 487 F.3d 892 (Fed.Ch-.2007).

Allen Brown v. Jeffrey E. Krueger

25 F.4th 526 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 10, 2022

v. … Brown cites no authority supporting this position, and we couldn’t find any. Although Brown cites United States v. Ma- ness, 23 F.3d 1006 (6th Cir. 1994), that case is inapposite.

Brown v. Thornton

30 F. App'x 144 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 28, 2002

Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel filed in his employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. … . § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).

Brown v. Donco Enterprises Inc.

783 F.2d 644 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 14, 1986

Brown (Brown) and Charles Butterfield (Butter-field) appealed the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Rand E. … .); Ashley Meadows Farm v.

Lake Superior Iron Co. v. Brown

44 F. 539 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · Sep 5, 1890

United States v. Sherman Brown

14 F.3d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 17, 1994

Brown pled guilty to counts V and VI on February 18, 1992, and a judgment of guilty was entered on those counts. … Brown therefore received a base offense level of thirty for each of counts I, II, III, IV and V.