Case law

Saturn Distribution Corp. v. Paramount Saturn, Ltd.

326 F.3d 684 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 10, 2003

Co. v. … Southland Corp. v.

Denise Kay Anderson v. Woodcreek Venture Ltd James May Linda Brown Curtis Brown

351 F.3d 911 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 5, 2003

See Dixon v. … The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Roell v.

United States v. Chalmers Brown

371 F.3d 854 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 10, 2004

See United States v. Valentine, 100 F.3d 1209, 1210 (6th Cir.1996). … Our earlier decision in United States v.

Brown v. City of Syracuse

197 F. App'x 22 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 26, 2006

See Norton v. … See Greene v. McGuire, 683 F.2d 32, 35 (2d Cir.1982). However, in Feola v.

Roger B. Wozniak and Shirley M. Wozniak v. County of Dupage

845 F.2d 677 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 21, 1988

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). … See Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984). In Hagee v.

Brown v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.

40 F. 849 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · Nov 15, 1889

Garrett v. White, 8 Ired. Eq. 131 ; Ramsay v. Bell, Id. 209 ; McBryde v. Patterson, 73 N. C. 478 . … Kirk v. Hamilton, 102 U. S. 68 -79.

Brown v. Card Service Center

464 F.3d 450 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 29, 2006

Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., No. 05-cv-0498 (E.D.Pa. Jun. 28, 2005), 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12810 , at *23. … See, e.g., Crossley v.

Brown v. Principi

6 F. App'x 869 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Mar 13, 2001

Belcher v. West, 214 F.3d 1335, 1337 (Fed.Cir.2000); see also Smith v. … Brown v. West, slip op. at 5.

Azevedo v. Brown

39 F.3d 324 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 24, 1994

39 F.3d 324 Azevedo v. Brown ** NO. 93-3227 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Oct 24, 1994 Appeal From: M.D.Fla., 805 F.Supp. 938 1 AFFIRMED. ** Local Rule 36 case

Brown v. New Orleans City

692 F. App'x 206 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 6, 2017

Brown v. Motorola Mobility Inc.

584 F. App'x 150 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 8, 2014

PER CURIAM: Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … See Brown v. Motorola Mobility Inc., No. 1:13-cv-01514-GBL-IDD (E.D.Va. Feb. 11, 2014).

Brown v. District of Columbia

493 F. App'x 110 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 27, 2012

We hold that, in light of the circumstances of and arguments made in this case, Brown was required to demonstrate constructive discharge to receive front pay and back pay. Clark v. … We have also reviewed the trial record and conclude that the district court’s determination that Brown failed to demonstrate constructive discharge was not clearly erroneous. Fogg v.

United States v. Glenn Brown

871 F.2d 80 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 28, 1989

We note that Brown failed to object to this instruction at the time of trial. Consequently, under Fed.R.Crim.P. 30, Brown has waived his right to challenge the instruction as error. See United States v. … See United States v. Eng, 753 F.2d 683, 687 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Franklin, 728 F.2d 994, 998 (8th Cir.1984); United States v. Koua Thao, 712 F.2d 369, 371 (8th Cir.1983).

Brown v. City of New York

183 F. 888 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Oct 5, 1910

It appears that on the day after these assessments became due the board of estimate andl apportionment authorized and approved the creation of a park which should include the entire land of the plaintiff. … This action of the board of estimate and apportionment was based on proceedings previously instituted for that purpose by the board of local improvement of the Bay Ridge district of Brooklyn, so that the city authorities

Brown v. Morgan

23 F. App'x 507 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 10, 2001

Brown appealed, and this court vacated and remanded the matter in order to determine whether tolling while administrative remedies were exhausted would render the complaint timely. Brown v. … Moreover, Brown has failed to even argue in his brief on appeal that his action was not barred, and has therefore abandoned the issue. See Boyd v. Ford Motor Co., 948 F.2d 283, 284 (6th Cir.1991).

Brown v. California Department of Corrections

554 F.3d 747 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 2009

Brown also sued the parole board members, the California Department of Corrections, the California Board of Prison Terms, and the prison warden. … BACKGROUND Brown’s claims stem from our grant of Brown’s habeas petition in Brown v. Poole, 337 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir.2003).

Brown v. Commercial Fire Insurance

21 App. D.C. 325 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 4, 1903

Brown v. Roger Williams Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394. *339 Substantially tbe same rule prevails in Massachusetts. King v. State Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 7 Cush. 1 , 6; Fogg v. Middlesex Ins. Co., 10 Cush. 337 , 346; Palmer Sav. … King v. State Mut. Ins. Co., I Cush. 1, 6; Brown *341 v. Roger Williams Ins. Co., 5 R. I. 394; Cone v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 60 N. Y. 619, 624 .

Brown v. Thaler

568 U.S. 1164 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 19, 2013

Brown v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.

37 F.2d 1010 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 20, 1930

Lanyon Zinc Co. v. Brown

115 F. 150 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 17, 1902

This patent was considered by this court in the case of Extraction Co. v. Brown, 43 C. C. … Brown, Selwyn C. Edgar, and Collinsville Zinc Co. v. Lanyon Zinc Co.,” was pending in the lower court when the decision in the case of Extraction Co. v.