Case law

Timothy Lundquist v. Seattle School District No. 1

Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 1, 2021

The evidence presented by the faculty established an offer, acceptance and consideration. Id. at 38. … But the policy clearly identifies Standard as the insurer, the District as the policyholder, and the employees as the insureds.

State of Washington v. Andrew John Sprint

Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 25, 2019

Andrew Sprint argues that Justin Valdez’s claim that Sprint roughly handled Charles does not establish that he harmfully touched Charles on April 16, 2014. … The $400 court appointed attorney fee and the $100 probation fee always qualified as discretionary legal financial obligations.

Jennifer Piukkula, V. David G. Piukkula

Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 8, 2022

The trial court responded: You don’t qualify for [CR 60(b)(11)]. So your client had a year to bring a motion and he didn’t do it. … But, as discussed above, the default decree clearly identified the real property as having been awarded to Jennifer.

Zachary Combs v. Dong Min Shin

Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 17, 2024

evidence at trial that they could qualify for financing to purchase the Property before the expiration of the First Addendum Term (March 15, 2020). … the parties remedied the lack of a checklist in 2017 with the walk through and checklist in 2019. 25 No. 57916-2-II The Combses argue that Shin and Bowers clearly

Michael & Myrna Darland v. Snoqualmie Pass Util. Dist.

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 16, 2019

The court qualified its ruling by stating that the Darlands might hold enforceable rights to hookups if they filed an engineered application to the utility district. … District clearly has the express authority to condemn land and interests in land for that purpose.

State Of Washington v. Andre Taylor

Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 28, 2015

She said that her client clearly committed [ a] sault That' s what she said because he negligently caused injury. 3. … Standard of Review To establish prosecutorial misconduct, a defendant bears the burden to establish both that 1) the prosecuting attorney committed misconduct by making inappropriate remarks, and (2) those

Personal Restraint Petition Of James Crockett, Sr.

Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 4, 2019

(1) Counsel’s performance was deficient To qualify as a “prior consistent statement” under ER 801(d)(1)(ii), a statement must be made at a time when the declarant did not have a motive to fabricate. … And, as in Ramirez-Estevez, the jury also observed the defendant deny the charges and clearly did not believe him.

State Of Washington v. Charles Edwin Pillon

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 27, 2020

containers, three were found to contain hazardous substances two exhibited characteristics of ignitability — and one exhibited characteristics of toxicity qualifying … Pillon objected on the grounds that the court “clearly expressed here a prejudgment.” I must note for the record that the Court’s clearly expressed here a prejudgment.

In Re The Dependency Of: S.d.m., Alexandrea Pedregon v. Dshs

Court of Appeals of Washington · Nov 13, 2018

And Pedregon does not establish any additional tailoring of services was warranted beyond what was offered by the Department. … ICWA and WICWA also require a termination order be "supported by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, including testimony of qualified expert witnesses, that the continued custody of the child by the parent or Indian custodian

Reynaldo S. Verduzco, Respondent/cross-app. V. King County Washington, Appellant/cross-resp.

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 30, 2024

However, regardless of the number of adverse actions alleged, the evidence clearly demonstrates at least one adverse action. … To establish a claim of unlawful retaliation by Defendant King County, Washington, Plaintiff Reynaldo S.

State Of Washington v. James Garrett Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 9, 2020

Laumen was “clearly concerned about [Phillips’s] condition.” Id. at 60-61. Wells and the other deputies who had arrived knocked on the front and back doors of the residence and announced themselves. … Whether the defendant had in fact inflicted substantial bodily harm on the victim is a different question than whether a weapon qualified as a deadly weapon because it was readily capable of causing substantial bodily harm

Gary Waddoups v. Nationwide Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 15, 2016

No documentary evidence established that Permann showed Marr Waddoups a quote for a life annuity with a refund feature. … Olsen was qualified to opine that the suitability of a life contingent annuity depends on the health of the annuitant.

Magdalene Pal v. D.s.h.s., State Of Washington

Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 5, 2019

Bournival explained that Timothy and Pal established an agreed upon plan for his medication management. … The evidence in the record established that Timothy had a history of forgetting to take his medication.

State Of Washington v. Kamran Monghate

Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 10, 2018

If a reason to doubt the defendant’s competency arises, a qualified expert or professional person approved by the prosecuting attorney shall be appointed to evaluate and report upon the defendant’s mental condition. … The question of whether a sentence is clearly excessive is reviewed for abuse of discretion. State v. Law, 154 Wn.2d 85, 93, 110 P.3d 717 (2005).

In the Matter of the Marriage of: Benjamin E. Jones & Lisa A.M. Jones

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 2, 2020

court abuses its discretion if its award is based on untenable grounds, is made for untenable reasons, or 7 No. 36509-3-III In re Marriage of Jones is manifestly unjust or clearly … Moreover, the court’s ruling on the $40,000 character was a reasoned decision that does not qualify for reversal under the abuse of discretion standard. The Chrysler Pacifica Ms.

Darrel Riley v. Suzette Riley

Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 21, 2017

residential provisions unless he or she establishes otherwise by a preponderance of the evidence." … Darrel argues that Family Bridges "was outside the range of acceptable choices" because the individuals who run the Family Bridges program are not well- qualified, the program operates at secret locations, and because neither

Peter & Rachel Atkinson, Et Ux. v. Les Schwab Tire Centers Of Wa, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 29, 2014

The record does not clearly indicate which, if either, is an actual diagnosis or simply medical terminology used to describe migraines that do not respond effectively to treatment. 3 The first name of Rory Cox is used … accommodate a disability: - ( 1) the employee has a sensory, mental, or physical abnormality that substantially limited his or her ability to perform the job; ( 2) the employee was qualified to perform the essential

State Of Washington v. Sean Stoll

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 1, 2014

Most clearly, Stoll' s attorney told the jury that " to convict you have to conclude unanimously beyond a reasonable doubt that this happened twice on two separate dates" within the charging period. … The clinician was qualified to testify as an expert given her specialized training as a nurse, her . experience treating child victims of sexual and physical assault, and her review of scientific literature.

State Of Washington, V Robert Ernest Vestre

Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 6, 2018

He did not express that the witness would be qualified to testify by having personal knowledge of events material to Vestre’s case. … McGary is clearly distinguishable from the facts here because, unlike the defendant in McGary, Vestre failed to produce the witness or provide substantive information regarding the basis of her testimony or the substance

State Of Washington v. Benjamin J. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 6, 2019

He also appeals his conviction of fourth degree assault on double jeopardy grounds.1 The trial court found that Williams qualified as a persistent offender under the POAA based on his current second degree rape … But his statement indicated that he took an act which amounted to forcible compulsion, which clearly would constitute a substantial step.