Case law

Sound Infiniti, Inc. ex rel. Pisheyar v. Snyder

145 Wash. App. 333 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 23, 2008

Thus, the reverse stock splits undertaken by the boards of Sound Infiniti and Infiniti of Tacoma qualify as corporate actions that Pisheyar was entitled to, and did, in fact, dissent from pursuant to the provisions of chapter … there was a likelihood that the actions of Snyder and Hannah had damaged the corporations, and thus enjoin the reverse stock split that eliminated his interest in the corporations, there is no basis to depart from the well-established

In re the Marriage of: Norman D. Leslie and Janelle L. Leslie

Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 30, 2013

establish the parents' responsibilities, and to minimize the child's exposure to harmful parental conflict. … Substantial evidence established the statutory criteria for sole decision making relied upon by the court..

State of Washington v. Larry James Belt

Court of Appeals of Washington · May 17, 2016

"Although no specific wording is required,jury instructions must define reasonable doubt and clearly communicate that the State carries the burden of proof." Bennett, 161 Wn.2d at 307. … For instance, (1) the absence of records establishing who Ms. Johnson called that night is inconsequential because the State was not required to establish these facts to convict Mr.

Duc Tan v. Le

161 Wash. App. 340 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Apr 19, 2011

The event, Armed Forces Day, commemorates the establishment of the *348 Southern Vietnamese Army and is typically held on June 19. … Alternatively, they maintain that even if the Public Notice’s overarching assertions qualify as statements of opinion, the underlying facts used to support the claim are untrue and therefore actionable as defamation. ¶23

In Re The Dependency Of: B.m.a., Dob 10/26/08 Seth Gladstone, App v. Dshs, Resp

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 12, 2017

But, unchallenged findings establish that whatever success S.G. had in treatment has been exceedingly short-lived. … Continuation of the parent-child relationship clearly diminishes the child's prospects for early integration into a stable and permanent home.

Kysar v. Lambert

76 Wash. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 4, 1995

Reversing, the appellate court said, "[a] party who does not initiate the business contact is not thereby immune from personal jurisdiction of Washington courts if a business relationship subsequently arises.” 32 Wn. … Any matter admitted in response to a Request for Admission you must consider as conclusively established. That means a party who makes an admission in response to a request cannot later contradict or deny the admission.

Joshua Billings, V Town Of Steilacoom

Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 26, 2017

Snohomish County, 119 Wn.2d 91, 117, 829 P.2d 746 (1992). 6 Our courts have clearly established that they may apply collateral estoppel to determinations in administrative hearings. Shoemaker v. … Billings failed to establish the elements of the claim.

Samiha Carroll, V. Renton School District

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 28, 2021

Carroll contends the comments made to the positive discipline trainer suggested she was not qualified for the assistant principal position. … She called me last night and I told her she better think clearly about that decision.

Personal Restraint Petition Of Robert R. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 1, 2020

Williams clearly faces a risk of severe consequences from COVID-19. The remaining question is the degree to which Williams’s confinement exacerbates this risk. … But the Department nevertheless determined that Williams did not qualify for an extraordinary medical placement based on its “community safety criteria.” Reply, Ex. 1, Attach.

Joyce v. State, Dept. of Corrections

75 P.3d 548 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 22, 2003

The trial court was satisfied that Stough's experience as a DOC correctional officer and supervisor qualified him to so testify. … The State objected to the giving of Instruction No. 20. [34] The instruction clearly misinformed the jury regarding the CCO's authority to arrest Stewart on the CCO's mere belief that Stewart appeared to present a danger

Deborah Despain, V Estate Of George Lund Jr And Duane Lund

Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 18, 2015

Therefore, to qualify as substantial evidence in this case the evidence must show that the ultimate fact in issue is " highly probable." Id. 2. … The Lunds' promise to devise the real property to Deborah Kellogg was supported by valuable consideration and had been clearly intended by the decedents. 6.

Lawrence Hill, Adam Wise, And Robert Miller, Res. v. Garda Cl Northwest, Inc., App.

198 Wash. App. 326 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Mar 27, 2017

Garda has clearly relied throughout on the purported meal period waivers in the CBAs. … The Supreme Court held that the trial court had clearly considered the risk at the outset of litigation and had not abused its discretion. Morgan, 166 Wn.2d at 540.

State Of Washington, V. Patrick Leon Nicholas

Court of Appeals of Washington · May 5, 2025

Lastly, unanimity among the scientific community is not required, and the court should exclude expert opinion only if there is a significant dispute among qualified experts. Erickson v. Pharmacia LLC, 31 Wn. … Given the facts of this case, a standard range sentence results in a presumptive sentence that is clearly too lenient.

Robert F. Utter & Faith Ireland, App./x-resp. v. Building Industry Assoc. Of Wa, Resp./x-app.

Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 16, 2013

The Washington Supreme Court observed that this legislation "sought to accomplish the initiative's purpose by establishing campaign contribution limits." Edelman, 152 Wn.2d at 587. … In any case where the order is not enforced by the court according to its terms, the reasons for the court's actions shall be clearly stated in writing, and the action shall be subject to review by the

White Water Construction, Inc. v. Dep't of Employment Security

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 19, 2021

The ALJ further ruled that Stevens did not qualify for a waiver of the overpayment and must repay the benefits he received. … A qualified party shall be considered to have prevailed if the qualified party obtained relief on a significant issue that achieves some benefit that the qualified party sought.

Michael E. Doron, Ph.D. v. Eastern Washington University

Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 9, 2014

They did clearly state that was their position. CP at 1677-78 (emphasis omitted). … "To establish that the union's exercise ofjudgment was in bad faith, the plaintiff must show 'substantial evidence of fraud, deceitful action or dishonest conduct.'"

Donna Woodcock, App/cross-resp v. Catherine Conover, Resps/apps

Court of Appeals of Washington · Sep 9, 2019

But Sloan is clearly distinguishable. … But Sloan clearly dealt with defects that would “not have been noticeable to a trained eye.” ki. at 789-91.

Skamania County, Res/cross-app V. Mitchell Dean Patton & Staci Lee Patton, App/cross-res

Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 8, 2022

Because Patton did not prevail on the due process claim, Patton does not qualify for fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. … “[T]he presence of reasonable allegations in a suit does not immunize the plaintiff against paying for the fees that his frivolous claims imposed.” Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 834, 131 S. Ct. 2205, 180 L.

In re the Marriage of: Cindy D. Scinto and John P. Scinto

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jul 28, 2022

Cindy Scinto develops trigger fingers, an immune system response to synovial tissue in her hands. The infirmity renders her fingers stiff and locked. … The Court also considered the standard of living that was established during the marriage.

Stacy Satterwhite, V. Bethel School District No. 403

Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 9, 2026

I’m not—it’s just clearly not something that a mandatory reporter would do. .... … Further, exhibit 2 simply states that personnel who report suspected abuse, in good faith, are immune from liability.