Case law

Castrejon v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Soto v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Yancey v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Washington · Sep 27, 2022

Hunte was not qualified to opine as to the disabling effect of 5 Plaintiff’s ALJ for rejecting Dr. … However, the record in this 10 matter does not clearly support a finding of disability. For instance, a 11 rheumatologist is the specialty practitioner for fibromyalgia. See Revels, 874 F.3d at 12 656, 662.

Martinez v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Brito v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Ramirez Rivera v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Medina v. Miller

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2024

Regardless of whether the Court’s bare- 6 bones analysis of the mandamus claim qualifies as a manifest error of law, the 7 Court clarifies its prior analysis of the mandamus claim.7 The Court will not, 8 however, amend … Language 9 When analyzing the last sentence of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), the Court in the 10 Dismissal Order stated: 11 Clearly

Galvan o/b/o D R v. Saul

District Court, E.D. Washington · Jul 28, 2020

Three-Step Childhood Disability Determination 9 To qualify for Title XVI supplement security income benefits, a child … examination is ordered, the consultative examiner is to append 20 the records that the examiner reviewed to the report, or at a minimum clearly

Surginer

District Court, E.D. Washington · Aug 26, 2026

Astrue, 700 F.3d 386, 389 (9th Cir. 2012). 16 When a claimant has documented medical evidence of alcoholism or drug 17 addiction, a disabled finding under the five-step inquiry does not automatically 18 qualify … “Thus, applying our 4 normal standard of review to the requirements of step two, [the Court] must 5 determine whether the ALJ had substantial evidence to find that the medical 6 evidence clearly established that [Plaintiff

Tweedy

District Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 27, 2026

Rituximab could interfere with his ability to mount an appropriate immune response to the vaccination. 2 Therefore, I would recommend deferring treatment with … Conclusion 6 Plaintiff establishes the ALJ erred.

LaMarsh

District Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 14, 2026

Kieffer does not qualify as a 19 medical source. … Conclusion 10 Plaintiff establishes the ALJ erred at step two.

Salinas-Gonzalez v. O'Malley

District Court, E.D. Washington · Sep 4, 2024

However, it does not appear that the claimant pursued imaging at that 2 time.”55 3 This general discussion of Plaintiff’s medical treatment does not qualify … Conclusion 2 Plaintiff establishes the ALJ erred.

Valencia Gonzalez v. Moran

District Court, E.D. Washington · Mar 19, 2024

The framework 4 Congress established for I-601A applications makes clear that USCIS must 5 adjudicate applications filed by eligible aliens. … The language 7 used in both sentences of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v) clearly indicates that USCIS’s 8 duty to adjudicate I-601A applications is a duty that involves the exercise of 9 discretion.

Tometczak v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Washington · Oct 20, 2021

Cowan was qualified to offer a medical opinion. … established.

Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. McCain Foods, Inc.

818 F. Supp. 1376 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 25, 1993

Had the Board been apprised of Matsler and Jayne’s cutting devices, which clearly produced french fries rather than chips, the patent would not have been granted. … The Act extends protection to unregistered trademarks by making the general principles qualifying a mark for registration under § 2 of the Act applicable to unregistered marks. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v.

State of Washington v. United States Food and Drug Administration

District Court, E.D. Washington · Apr 7, 2023

Id. at 878. 6 Mandatory injunctions are disfavored and require a higher showing that the “facts 7 and law clearly favor the moving party.” Garcia v. … Therefore, Plaintiffs have 9 established standing. 10 2.

National City Bank, N.A. v. Prime Lending, Inc.

737 F. Supp. 2d 1257 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Dec 13, 2010

Those reports contained confidential information that qualified as a trade secret, such as the employee’s compensation and whether the employee had loans scheduled to be completed. (Ct. Rec. 115 Ex. 8 at 84-86.) … Working for a competitor while still employed by PNC clearly violated Thomas’s duty of loyalty. See Organon, Inc. v. Hepler, 23 Wash.App. 432, 436-37 , 595 P.2d 1314 (1979). 4.

Harlow v. O'Malley

District Court, E.D. Washington · Oct 18, 2023

This was established 8 according to Dr. … Clearly, the seizure medication reduced the 4 severity and frequency of Plaintiff’s seizures.

Gutierrez v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. Washington · May 29, 2020

If an impairment does, the claimant is per se disabled and qualifies for 8 benefits. Id. … When a claimant produces objective medical evidence, however, 14 “an ALJ may find that a claimant lacks a medically severe impairment or 15 combination of impairments only when his conclusion is ‘clearly established

Kettle Range Conservation Group v. United States Forest Service

148 F. Supp. 2d 1107 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jul 10, 2001

The FEIS thus suggests that finances was the one category in which Alternative D was clearly preferable. … A large portion of the dropped acreage was in areas that had reportedly been so devastated already that logging was clearly necessary.