Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
658 results
1.14s
District Court, E.D. Washington · Apr 4, 2024
immunity on Plaintiff’s claim for the deprivation a right to an education. 10 ECF No. 7 at 2. … claim against the School 5 Defendants under Section 1983. 6 Plaintiff’s response brief appears to accept these deficiencies and pivots to 7 argue that his complaint “clearly
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 9, 2023
Plaintiff now contends that Washington substantive law applies 13 because the California District Court held so, even though Plaintiff’s complaint 14 clearly alleges California law applies. … Both those actions are allowed under the law and Plaintiff has not established a breach of a 5|| duty owed which would support his negligence claim.
Cited 0 timesUnknown348 F. Supp. 2d 1169 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Feb 27, 2004
The Fifth Circuit noted that in reversing plaintiff Clay’s conviction, the Mississippi Supreme Court had clearly ruled in his favor on the claim that the trial court erred in, setting excessive bail and thus, on that matter … The portion of this court's decision denying summary judgment to defendant Perez on qualified immunity grounds was reversed by the Ninth Circuit, Gausvik v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDohrman v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services
District Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 24, 2025
Dohrman’s claims in the prior case were based entirely on events 6 leading up to her termination from employment, the claims clearly “relate to the same set 7 of facts.” … But it is well 19 established that the State and the arms of the State are immune from suit under § 1983.
Cited 0 timesUnknown682 F. Supp. 2d 1203 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 12, 2010
Prior to his death, Evans established “Wapato Heritage LLC” to manage his non-trust assets. … Plaintiffs’ admit that the MA-8 landowners qualified as “interested parties” to the Evans’ estate-yet they did not receive notice.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 3, 2022
court 17 proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). 18 A state court decision is “contrary to” clearly established Supreme Court 19 precedent “if it applies a rule that contradicts … Vincent, 538 U.S. 634, 640 (2003) (citation and 2 internal quotation marks omitted). 3 A state court decision “involve[s] an unreasonable application” of clearly 4 established
Cited 0 timesUnknown552 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Dec 15, 1982
The new program established uniform eligibility criteria. … The state standard clearly applies to the grandfather-ee.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · Feb 10, 2026
Plaintiff does not clearly allege 17 violations other than legal conclusions made throughout the pleading. … As established, Plaintiff did, at 14 times, provide facts and legal authority, but not consistently. 15 As was previously discussed, the same issues about state actors and 16 immunity arise with many
Cited 0 timesUnknownBradford v. Life Insurance Co. of North America
49 F. Supp. 3d 789 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Sep 8, 2014
Evidence outside the administrative record may only be considered when “circumstances clearly establish that it is necessary to conduct an adequate de novo review of the benefit decision.” *791 Ingram v. … Bradford’s physical capacities clearly states that Mr. Bradford can only sit on an occasional basis.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBlaylock v. Medical Lake School District
District Court, E.D. Washington · Feb 20, 2025
of some right, privilege, or immunity protected by the Constitution or 6 laws of the United States. … Appx. 367, 369 (9th Cir. 19 2019), in which the Ninth Circuit upheld a denial of qualified immunity of school 20 officials and the school district based on a failure to report suspected physical 1 abuse.
Cited 0 timesUnknown970 F. Supp. 824 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jun 9, 1997
The Supreme Court also has clearly held that restrictions upon prisoners’ constitutional rights are permissible, so long as those restrictions are “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” Turner v. … immunity.
Cited 25 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · Feb 21, 2024
and 2 immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. … to immunity under the Eleventh 10 Amendment.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · Aug 4, 2026
immunity. … Holloway was shielded by qualified immunity from Plaintiff’s Fourteenth 15 Amendment equal protection claim.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCheesman v. Ellensburg School District
District Court, E.D. Washington · Feb 18, 2020
not find that Plaintiff’s constitutional rights 6 were violated when school officials asked L.C. about the bruising around her eye. 7 Even if this were a constitutional violation, Defendants would be entitled to 8 qualified … immunity as there is no clearly established law addressing this issue.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPacific Ins. Co. v. Catholic Bishop of Spokane
450 F. Supp. 2d 1186 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Apr 24, 2006
charitable immunity overturned. … Clearly, a covered person intentionally striking a golf ball with the intention that it land on its assigned fairway or green, but which sharply diverts from its intended course and strikes a player on an adjacent fairway
Cited 9 timesPublished728 F. Supp. 632 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jan 11, 1990
The same section goes on to provide as follows: The Commission, in the guidelines promulgated pursuant to subsection (a)(1), shall for each category of offense involving each category of defendant, establish a sentencing … Michael Innis - Granted pocket immunity With the exception of Mr.
Vacated on other grounds by United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. John Boshell, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, 952 F.2d 1101 (1991)Cited 16 timesPublishedRichards v. Healthcare Resources Group, Inc.
131 F. Supp. 3d 1063 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Sep 16, 2015
She establishes *1072 a dispute of fact as to whether she was qualified for the position, alleging that she was trained insufficiently but that her performance nevertheless was improving measurably at the time of her termination … This theory of negligence is not clearly described in the complaint, See ECF No. 1, Compl. ¶¶ 67-70.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · Dec 22, 2021
to 13 commissioners). 14 Here, Commissioner Gigliotti’s challenged decision clearly falls within the 15 scope of judicial immunity. … Id. 12 However, Plaintiff’s single experience with Commissioner Gigliotti is insufficient 13 to establish an improper custom. Meehan, 856 F.2d at 107.
Cited 0 timesUnknown725 F. Supp. 2d 1279 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Jul 16, 2010
Also, they assert that the court is without subject matter jurisdiction to attribute ownership to the Defendants when the public record, which is conclusive evidence, clearly establishes the Defendants have never enjoyed … Actual intent may be established either by direct or circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence can be used to establish the existence of “badges of fraud.”
Cited 7 timesPublishedCity of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Sterling Financial Corp.
963 F. Supp. 2d 1092 · District Court, E.D. Washington · Aug 5, 2013
Sterling was not immune from the effects of the Great Recession. … Defendants contend that Sterling improperly qualified for this program because it represented itself as a well-qualified institution, which it was not. Id.
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna