Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.21s
124 Fed. Cl. 630 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 15, 2016
Capital Corp. v. United States, 93 Fed. … Edwards v. United States, 22 Cl. Ct. 411, 420 (1991) (citing Essen Mall Properties v. United States, 21 Cl. Ct. 430, 440 (1990); Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States, 3 Cl.
Cited 8 timesPublished65 Fed. Cl. 135 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2005
The Board is authorized to correct records. 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (a); 42 U.S.C. § 213a(a)(12). Its power to craft a fit remedy is substantial. See, e.g., Denton v. … This the Board cannot do. Cf. Haselrig v. United States, 333 F.3d 1354, 1355 (Fed.Cir.2003) (discussing special selection board review following correction of serviceman’s record); Hoskins v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedMendez-Cardenas v. United States
88 Fed. Cl. 162 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 13, 2009
United States, 84 Fed.Cl. 350, 353 (2008) (quoting Brown v. United States (Brown), 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997)). The jurisdiction of this court is limited to claims against the United States. United States v. … See Arakaki v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedDawson-Paschall v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 19, 2026
See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 887 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (First Amendment); Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 (Fourth Amendment); Trafny v. United States, 503 F.3d 1339, 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (Eighth Amendment); Greene v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2022
See, e.g., Eastman v. United States, 33 Fed. … Ashcroft v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIgnatius M. Tee, Jr. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 10, 2025
At the senior member’s discretion, any board member may ask the student or counsel to clarify any testimony or statements brought before the board.” NSTC M-1533.2E § 6-12 ¶ 3. … V; then citing 10 U.S.C. § 831(a); and then quoting Griffin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished108 Fed. Cl. 150 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 21, 2012
See Brown, 73 F.3d at 1102 . … See Brown, 73 F.3d at 1102 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 30, 2020
In Colon v. … See Analytical Graphics, Inc. v. United States, 135 Fed. Cl. 378, 407 (2017) (citing Duncan v.
Cited 0 timesPublished49 Fed. Cl. 713 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 10, 2001
Plaintiff appealed the contracting officer’s decision to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “ASBCA”), and the DLA asserted its counterclaim of $1.6 million. … Stillwell v. Brown, 46 F.3d 1111, 1113 (Fed.Cir.1995) (citations omitted); see also Clemmons v.
Cited 4 timesPublished40 Fed. Cl. 784 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 22, 1998
An appeal with the HHS Appeals Board (the Board), Docket No. A-94-208, was filed on September 23, 1994. On March 8, 1995, the Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. … Moreover, the appeal which was filed with the HHS Appeals Board and which was dismissed as untimely also did not toll the limitations period. In Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished106 Fed. Cl. 343 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2012
Surface Transportation Board in STB Docket No. AB-855 (Sub-No. IX). … State Land Board v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNathan T. Meidl v. United States
114 Fed. Cl. 607 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 30, 2014
See FW/PBS, Inc. v. … That the court “might disagree” with the decision of a board for correction of military records, in and of itself, is insufficient to overturn a correction board’s decision. See Storey v.
Cited 4 timesPublished83 Fed. Cl. 250 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2008
.”); Brown Bros. Equip. Co. v. State, 51 Mich.App. 448 , 215 N.W.2d 591, 593-94 (1974). … Brown, of such discrimination. .
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2020
This Court will not disturb a decision of a military corrections board unless it is “arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.” Barnick v. U.S., 591 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. … Cir. 2010), citing Chambers v. U.S., 417 F.3d 1218, 1227 (Fed. Cir. 2005). If the Court finds that the board’s decision was reasonable and supported by substantial evidence, it will not overturn the board’s decision.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 14, 2025
He alleges that the taking occurred when the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) issued a Notice of Interim Trail Use (“NITU”) that prevented the Norfolk Southern Railway (the “Railroad”) from consummating the abandonment … See, e.g., Nicholson v. United States, 170 Fed. Cl. 399, 410 (2024); Brown v. United States, 153 Fed. Cl. 318, 331 (2021).
Cited 0 timesPublishedGloria Treviño, Individually and as Next Friend for Robert Rodriguez Treviño v. United States
113 Fed. Cl. 204 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2013
(citations omitted); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997), reh’g denied (1997); Smith v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 581, 583-84 (2011) (citing Moore v. Pub. Defender’s Office, 76 Fed. … Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)). C.
Cited 50 timesPublished33 Fed. Cl. 507 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 1995
Judicial review of a BCNR decision should be limited to whether the board’s decision was “arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, or contrary to applicable statutes and regulations.” Heisig v. … The court notes that TDRL placement is warranted where a surgery scheduled in the future would undoubtedly cause permanent disability; thus, the TDRL could have been recommended by the Regional Board. See Beckham v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMynette Technologies, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2022
Steel, 730 F.2d at 1468; Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992)). “In balancing these conflicting interests the . . . … Steel, 730 F.2d at 1468; Brown Bag Software, 960 F.2d at 1470). This case presents facts analogous to Blackbird Tech. 2016 WL 2904592, at *4–6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNovacare, Inc. v. United States
52 Fed. Cl. 165 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 25, 2002
True v. United States, 190 F.3d at 1175 (citing Brown v. United States, 782 F.2d at 563 ). … Id. at 1430 ; see also True v. United States, 190 F.3d at 1175 (citing Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublished57 Fed. Cl. 100 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 27, 2003
Compare Brown v. Secretary of the Army, 918 F.2d 214, 218 (D.C.Cir.1990) (a plaintiff who otherwise meets the requirements of the BPA may recover interest via the BPA in a Title VII action); Social Security Admin, v. … Lujan, 40 F.3d 1152, 1154 (10th Cir.1994) (adopting Brown), with Ameson v.
Cited 22 timesPublished
Ask Donna