Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.04s
Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
50 Fed. Cl. 443 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 10, 2001
Plaintiffs rely on a decision by the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (GSBCA), Trimble Navigation, Ltd., Comp. Gen. Dec. … GraphicData, LLC v.
Cited 38 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 19, 2019
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). … See Jordan v. United States, 128 Fed. Cl. 46, 53-54 (2016) (Fifth and Fomteenth Amendment due process claims, as well as the Eighth Amendment, are not money-mandating); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623-24 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 19, 2019
Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d 1167, 1172 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en bane in relevant part) (citing United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216 (1983); United States v. Testan, 424 U.S, 392, 398 (1976)). … Shipbuilders, Inc. v. United States, 871 F.2d 1077, 1079 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (tort claims), of. Brown vy. United States, 88 Fed. Cl. 322, 328 (2009) (citing Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 379 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedVaughan ex rel. A. H. v. United States
107 Fed. Cl. 212 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 14, 2012
See, e.g., Cedillo v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 617 F.3d 1328, 1338-39 (Fed.Cir.2010); Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 592 F.3d 1315, 1324 (Fed.Cir.2010); Andreu v. … Decision at 11 (citing Cucuras v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 993 F.2d 1525, 1528 (Fed.Cir.1993); Campbell v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 69 Fed.Cl. 775, 779 (Fed.Cl.2006); Shapiro v.
Cited 30 timesPublishedM.S.B. Ex Rel. Bast v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
117 Fed. Cl. 104 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 25, 2014
He is board certified in general pediatrics and in neurology, with a special competence in child neurology. Id. In his original expert report, Dr. … See United States v.
Cited 31 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 440 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 15, 2016
Cl. at 202; DX 1 at 11-12 (Report of the Puerto Rico Planning Board, “Culebra: A Plan for Conservation and Development” (Oct. 1973)). … E.g., Phillips v. Washington Legal Found., 524 U.S. 156, 164 (1998) (citing Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedCitizens Financial Services, FSB v. United States
59 Fed. Cl. 27 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 17, 2003
Bank v. … Ohio v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedFishermen's Finest, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 27, 2021
In addition to the permit and licensing requirements of this part, and except as provided in paragraph (k)(2) of this section, each vessel within the GOA or the BSAI must have an LLP groundfish license on board … Pursuant to 50 C.F.R. § 648.4(a)(5) (1996), the Atlantic Star was required to carry on board a valid Atlantic mackerel permit to fish for, possess, or land Atlantic Mackerel in or from the EEZ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedProgress for Bakersfield Veterans, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2022
See Crassociates, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. … Serv., Inc. v. United States, 63 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMerchants' Funding Group v. United States
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,805 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 1995
Plaintiffs appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals was likewise dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. … See e.g., United States v. Shannon, 342 U.S. 288, 293 , 72 S.Ct. 281, 284 , 96 L.Ed. 321 (1952); Kingsbury v. United States, 215 Ct.Cl. 136 , 563 F.2d 1019 (1977).
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 2021
United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216 (1983); see also United States v. … See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (recognizing that the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over tort claims, such as fraud).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPomeroy v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 8, 2025
Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments. … Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Human. Servs., 129 Fed. Cl. 691, at 706 (2016), citing Preseault v. U.S., 52 Fed. Cl. 667 (2002); Response at 3.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHickey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2026
Brown, Siri & Glimstad LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Petitioner. Tyler King, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … Tully v. Sec’y of Health & Hum.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHenningsen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 4, 2026
Bajakian was board certified by the American Board of Radiology with a subspeciality in Neuroradiology. First Bajakian Rep. at 1. Dr. … Zucconi is board-certified by the American Board of Radiology with a Certificate of Added Qualification in Neuroradiology. Over the course of his career, Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2018
After a VA Regional Office has made a decision, the Secretary and the Board of Veterans' Appeals review such decisions. 28 U.S.C § 7104(a). … It is then reviewed by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which has "exclusive jurisdiction" regarding decisions of the Board of Veteran's Appeals. 38 U.S.C. 7252(a).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHuber v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2024
See Huber v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … Such an across-the- board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)7 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHernandez, Kroone and Associates, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 23, 2014
In Farrar v. … Stillwell v. Brown, 46 F.3d 1111, 1113 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (quoting Chiu, 948 F.2d 715). The predominant issue in this case was the scope of the contract that the Corps of Engineers (“COE”) awarded to plaintiff.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 23, 2022
Gov’t v. United States, 887 F.3d 1354, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2018); Adams v. United States, 391 F.3d 1212, 1218 (Fed. Cir. 2004); see generally Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … At most, he pleads that a former federal official was on the board of a bank that deprived him of his property. Assuming that is true — and making allowances for Plaintiff’s pro se status, see Scott v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCOLONIAL CHEVROLET CO., INC. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2025
Id.; see also United States v. Gen. … Loretto v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhitehead v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 25, 2021
Carroll is board certified in neurology with special competence in child neurology and was an associate professor of Pediatrics and Neurology at Washington University and at the Medical College of Georgia. Id. at 2. … Raymond is board certified in neurology with special qualifications in child neurology as well as clinical genetics. Raymond CV at 1. Currently, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna