Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

0.63s

  • Tyger Construction Co. v. United States

    38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,499 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 1993

    The two landmark cases, Bowen and Bradley v. School Board, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974), come to vastly different, if not contradictory, conclusions. … Board of Educ., 697 F.Supp. 167 (D.N.J.1988); United States v. Oakwood Downriver Medical Ctr., 687 F.Supp. 302 (E.D.Mich.1988); United States v. Ettrick Wood Prods., Inc., 683 F.Supp. 1262 (W.D.Wis.1988); Gravitt v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Almanza v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2017

    In addition, the government argues that under Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. … Id. at 7 (referencing Martin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vaughan ex rel. A. H. v. United States

    107 Fed. Cl. 212 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 14, 2012

    See, e.g., Cedillo v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 617 F.3d 1328, 1338-39 (Fed.Cir.2010); Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 592 F.3d 1315, 1324 (Fed.Cir.2010); Andreu v. … Decision at 11 (citing Cucuras v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 993 F.2d 1525, 1528 (Fed.Cir.1993); Campbell v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 69 Fed.Cl. 775, 779 (Fed.Cl.2006); Shapiro v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Riviera Drilling & Exploration Co. v. United States

    61 Fed. Cl. 395 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 28, 2004

    Plaintiff cites, instead, to an administrative decision by the Interior Board of Land Appeals of the United States Department of the Interior, Holcomb Oil and Gas, Inc. and Maralex Res., Inc., IBLA 98-397, 98-402, 149 IBLA … Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ramirez v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 19, 2019

    Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). … See Jordan v. United States, 128 Fed. Cl. 46, 53-54 (2016) (Fifth and Fomteenth Amendment due process claims, as well as the Eighth Amendment, are not money-mandating); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623-24 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Carter v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 19, 2019

    Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d 1167, 1172 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (en bane in relevant part) (citing United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216 (1983); United States v. Testan, 424 U.S, 392, 398 (1976)). … Shipbuilders, Inc. v. United States, 871 F.2d 1077, 1079 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (tort claims), of. Brown vy. United States, 88 Fed. Cl. 322, 328 (2009) (citing Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 379 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Golden v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2024

    He is board- certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and the American Board of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and he is licensed to practice in fourteen states. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Citizens Financial Services, FSB v. United States

    59 Fed. Cl. 27 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 17, 2003

    Bank v. … Ohio v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Blakley v. United States

    85 Fed. Cl. 360 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 31, 2008

    Group v. … Id. at 6-7 (citing Cook v. Brown, 68 F.3d 447, 453 (Fed.Cir.1995) (“[T]he EAJA must be read in light of its purpose to diminish the deterrent effect of seeking review of, or defending against, governmental action.”)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Progress for Bakersfield Veterans, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2022

    See Crassociates, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. … Serv., Inc. v. United States, 63 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Colonial Surety Co. v. United States

    108 Fed. Cl. 622 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 14, 2013

    Co. v. … Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Merchants' Funding Group v. United States

    40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,805 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 1995

    Plaintiffs appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals was likewise dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. … See e.g., United States v. Shannon, 342 U.S. 288, 293 , 72 S.Ct. 281, 284 , 96 L.Ed. 321 (1952); Kingsbury v. United States, 215 Ct.Cl. 136 , 563 F.2d 1019 (1977).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bowden v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 2021

    United States v. Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 216 (1983); see also United States v. … See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (recognizing that the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction over tort claims, such as fraud).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Henningsen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 4, 2026

    Bajakian was board certified by the American Board of Radiology with a subspeciality in Neuroradiology. First Bajakian Rep. at 1. Dr. … Zucconi is board-certified by the American Board of Radiology with a Certificate of Added Qualification in Neuroradiology. Over the course of his career, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Augusta v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2018

    After a VA Regional Office has made a decision, the Secretary and the Board of Veterans' Appeals review such decisions. 28 U.S.C § 7104(a). … It is then reviewed by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which has "exclusive jurisdiction" regarding decisions of the Board of Veteran's Appeals. 38 U.S.C. 7252(a).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Huber v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2024

    See Huber v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. … Such an across-the- board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)7 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Marathon Targets, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 21, 2025

    A Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) rated Plaintiff’s initial Technical proposal “Unacceptable” and rated MVP’s Technical proposal “Marginal.” Id. … Star v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hickey v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2026

    Brown, Siri & Glimstad LLP, Kansas City, MO, for Petitioner. Tyler King, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … Tully v. Sec’y of Health & Hum.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • A. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 10, 2019

    Leist, who is board-certified in neurology and psychiatry. Resp. Ex. B at 1; Tr. at 111. … Cetaruk, who is board- certified in medical toxicology and emergency medicine. Resp. Ex. H at 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dureiko v. United States

    42 Fed. Cl. 568 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 9, 1998

    Act, explicitly states, “[t]he United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction to render judgment upon any claim against the United States ... not sounding in tort.” 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (a)(1) (1994); see also Brown … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.