Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
5.65s
California Oregon Broadcasting, Inc. v. United States
74 Fed. Cl. 394 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2006
Co. of Am. v. … See Pruner v. Brown, 216 Va. 885 , 223 S.E.2d 890 (Va.1976); Steen v. Rus-tad, 132 Mont. 96 , 313 P.2d 1014 (1957); Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedJohnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 18, 2024
Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)6 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBantugan v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 21, 2020
Harris is board certified in anatomic pathology and neuropathology. … In Daubert v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlvarado Construction, Inc. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,708 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 4, 1994
Mayfair Construction Co. v. … In addition, defendant argues that Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAaa Pharmacy, Inc. v. United States
112 Fed. Cl. 387 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 2013
CMS Pub. 100-08, Change Request 3601 (Jan. 14, 2005). 3 A supplier may seek review of the administrative law judge’s decision with the HHS Departmental Appeals Board, and subsequently, may seek judicial review of the full … V 2005); 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); CMS Pub. 100-08, Change Request 3601 (Jan. 14, 2005); see Anderson v. Sullivan, 959 F.2d 690, 692 (8th Cir. 1992); see also Ahmed v. Sebelius, 710 F. Supp. 2d 167, 172-73 (D.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2018
Brown v. United States, I 05 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. I 997). Further, the only proper defendant in this court is the United States. E4, United States v. Sherwood,312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941) (citations omitted). … E.q., Jefferson v. United States, 104 Fed. Cl. 81, 88-89 (2012). V.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTejeda v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 21, 2025
He is board certified in neurology, with a subspeciality in electrodiagnostic medicine and neuromuscular disorders, and he maintains his medical license in New Jersey. (Id. at 1.) Dr. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993)); Bushnell v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 02-1648V, 2015 WL 4099824, at *12 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 12, 2015) (finding that “because Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCamden Shipping Corp. v. United States
89 Fed. Cl. 433 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 15, 2009
Over & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 54 Fed.Cl. 514, 521 (2002); MCS Mgmt., Inc. v. United States, 48 Fed.Cl. 506, 515 (2001); Griffy’s Landscape Maint. LLC v. United States, 46 Fed.Cl. 257 (2000). … argues that this rationale does not support refusing revival of its offer, making three distinct arguments: (1) it maintains that there is a relevant difference between RFPs and IFBs; (2) it believes certain Armed Services Board
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 26, 2018
Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621,624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Further, the only proper defendant in this court is the United States. E.g., United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 ( l94l ) (citations omitted). … See. e.9., Silva v. Crain, 169 F.3d 608,610 (9th Cir. 1999).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished56 Fed. Cl. 30 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2003
Arizona v. … Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 614 (Fed.Cir.1994); Blinderman Constr. Co. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2023
UnitedHealth Mil. & Veterans Servs., LLC v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 529, 551 (2017); Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. … In the SSEB’s report, the Board included each offeror’s percentage breakdowns, if provided, to explain its recency and relevancy determinations. (AR 3157–59).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCapital Development Co. v. United States
49 Fed. Cl. 178 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2001
Hos-kins Lumber Co., Inc. v. … Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCane Tennessee, Inc. v. United States
62 Fed. Cl. 481 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 3, 2003
In Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. … See also Gerdes v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKallin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 5, 2026
Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAuch v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2017
See, e.g., Daniel v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 10-745V, 2016 WL 7785955, at *3 n.9 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Dec. 21, 2016); Pentcholov v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 14-414V, 2016 WL 3197389, at *6 (Fed. … Apr. 29, 2016); Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09-426V, 2012 WL 952268, at *10-11 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 29, 2012). Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 24, 2019
ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. … She appealed that decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board ("MSPB"), which denied her claim as untimely, and eventually she appealed to the Federal Circuit.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 29, 2023
(second alteration in original) (quoting, respectively, Pilgrim v. Littlefield, 92 F.3d 413, 416 (6th Cir. 1996), Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989), and Erwin v. Edwards, 22 F. … See United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAuthentic Apparel Group, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2019
I think it’s common sense that we were trying to get him on board. We felt confident. … J. on Count V 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 17, 2021
He is licensed to practice medicine in the state of New York and board certified in neurology with special qualifications in child neurology. Stone CV at 4. Dr. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993) (“[w]hen an expert assumes facts that are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence, a finder of fact may properly reject the expert’s opinion”)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedSacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2013
As a result of a public referendum, on June 7, 1989, SMUD’s Board of Directors decided to shut down Rancho Seco permanently. Id. at 340. … Dist. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna