Case law

Seneca Sawmill Company v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 19, 2022

(“Pl.’s Br.”) at 3, ECF No. 102, and produces more than five-hundred million board feet of lumber per year, Tr. vol. 1, 33:6–10. … Daly Const., Inc. v. Garrett, 5 F.3d 520, 522 (Fed. Cir. 2019); see also Sonoma Apartment Assocs. v. United States, 939 F.3d 1293, 1299 (Fed.

Porges v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 6, 2018

See, e.g., Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 16-1547V, 2017 WL 5080737, at *1 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Oct. 11, 2017) (awarding Ms. Meyers $350 per hour for work performed for 2016 through 2017); Duvernay v. … See Brown, 2017 WL 5080737. Moreover, the number of hours expended in this case by petitioner’s counsel appear to be reasonable. Therefore, the requested fee of $8,352.00 is awarded for paralegal work. C.

Persyn v. United States

36 Fed. Cl. 708 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 1996

Navarro-Ayala v. Nunez, 968 F.2d 1421 , 1427 n. 5 (1st Cir.1992) (citing Figueroa-Ruiz v. Alegría, 905 F.2d 545, 549 (1st Cir. 1990), and Brown v. Federation of State Medical Bds., 830 F.2d 1429 , 1438 (7th Cir. 1987)). … By contrast, in Navarro-Ayala v.

Difazio v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2017

Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521-22 (Fed. Cir. 1993); see also Hines v. … Thomas Morgan is a board certified neurologist and a Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine at Brown University. Pet’r’s Ex. 12, ECF No. 23-2. Dr.

Abatement Contracting Corp. v. United States

58 Fed. Cl. 594 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 26, 2003

Cooper & Assoc, v. … Corp. v.

Bes design/build, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2021

v. … The On-Board Review meeting minutes further indicate numerous comments made regarding “Electrical drawings,” including, as relevant to the case before the court: “16.

Zin Technologies, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2024

The board thoroughly reviewed and considered the information provided. … Tech. v. United States, 66 Fed.

ATA Defense Industries, Inc. v. United States

41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,147 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 27, 1997

Center v. … In addition, in United States v.

Goodwin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 7, 2024

Shah * v. … Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99- 539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr.

Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 23, 2020

Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 351 (1978) (citing Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 501 (1947)). … For example, in Baron Services, Inc. v.

CBY Design Builders v. United States

105 Fed. Cl. 303 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 23, 2012

Both a Solicitation Review Board (“SRB”) and a Contract Review Board (“CRB”) reviewed the acquisition and made comments. Id.; AR, Tab 17 at 11080. … Corp. v.

Westbrook v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 4, 2026

Accordingly, I will reduce the sum to be awarded for damages briefing (a total of 26.2 hours, or $11,527.00) by ten percent. 6 Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 7 fairly captures the overbilling … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

Sommerfield v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 22, 2025

Rochester v. United States, 18 Cl. … Instead, in appropriate circumstances special masters may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.

Lea v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 19, 2014

See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Nor does this court have jurisdiction over suits against private parties, such as the Farmers National Bank or its employees. See Gharb v. … See Keene v. United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 (1993); Rick 's Mushroom Serv., Inc. v. United States, 521 F.3d 1338, 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2008); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Brickey v.

Esters v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · May 3, 2024

Accordingly, I will reduce the sum to be awarded for entitlement briefing (a total of 32.5 hours, or $11,700.00) by twenty percent.7 Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt)8 fairly captures the … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.

Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United States

79 Fed. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2007

Brown-stein’s declaration, then, only “recite[s] the general rationale for the deliberative process privilege without identifying any particular concern with disclosure of information on these issues.” Id. at 11. … Co-op. v. United States, 77 Fed.Cl. 330 (2007).

Johnson v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 31, 2025

Saxton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521–22 (Fed. Cir. 1993); see also Hines v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 22 Cl. Ct. 750, 753 (1991). … This amount also includes expert services performed by Naveed Mayer Natanzi, DO, board certified in pain management, and physical medicine and rehabilitation, at $520.00 per hour for 21 hours totaling $10,920.00.

Jennings v. United States

126 Fed. Cl. 764 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 26, 2016

Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 498 (1975). Standing must be determined “as of the commencement of suit[.]” Rothe Dev. Corp. v. Dep’t of Def., 413 F.3d 1327, 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (quoting Lujan v. … See Sniadach v. Family Fin. Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337, 342 (1969); see also North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v.

Dinh v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 2022

Bellanti is a board-certified physician. Ex. 23, dated February 3, 2013, at 4 (ECF No. 34-3) (“Bellanti CV”). … Rachelefsky is a board-certified pediatrician with sub-specialties in allergy and immunology. Ex. A, Tab 29, dated November 21, 2016, at 1 (ECF No. 40-10) (“Rachelefsky CV”).

Valentine v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 20, 2026

Such an across-the-board reduction (which I am empowered to adopt) 5 fairly captures the overbilling evidenced by this work, without requiring me to act as a “green eye-shaded accountant” in identifying with specificity each … See, e.g., Abbott v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 135 Fed. Cl. 107, 111 (2017); Raymo v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs, 129 Fed. Cl. 691, 702-704 (2016); Sabella v. Sec’y of Health & Hum. Servs., 86 Fed.