Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

3.74s

  • Howard v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 17, 2016

    Reth·ement Board, No. 15-679 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 19, 2015)"); and the Opinion and Order issued by the United States District Comt for the Southern District of Ohio, dated September 15, 2016 ("Opinion and Order, Howard v. … Complaint, Howard v. United States R.R. Retirement Board, No. 15-679 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 19, 2015). The district court dismissed plaintiffs claim on September 15, 2016. Opinion and Order, Howard v. United States R.R.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Trace Systems Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 15, 2023

    Corp. v. … .”); see also Rockwell Int’l Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ambase Corp. v. United States

    61 Fed. Cl. 794 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2004

    In Suess v. … That section is entitled “Limitation on Court Action” and reads in full: “Except as provided in this section, no court may take any action, except at the request of the Board of Directors by regulation or order, to restrain

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Cardiosom, L.L.C. v. United States

    115 Fed. Cl. 761 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2014

    Ass’n v. … The parties’ dispute centered on the use of the word “issue” in the regulation, id., which provided that: “Once there is a final decision on a motion . . . relating to a prior Board decision on an issue, that prior Board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • El v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 2, 2015

    Cir. 2000); Brown v' United sham pleas of not guilty on behalf of the Petitioner without authorization, trial has commenced and Petitioner has been found guilty through colorable proceedings." … See United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whalen v. United States

    80 Fed. Cl. 685 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 12, 2008

    Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co., 926 F.2d 1574, 1577 (Fed.Cir.1991); see also Walton v. … The government further asserts that plaintiffs are not vulnerable to retaliation because government employees may seek recourse for any retaliation through the Office of Special Counsel or the Merit Systems Protection Board

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Global Freight Systems Co. W.L.L. v. United States

    130 Fed. Cl. 780 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 2017

    Alternatively, Plaintiff alleges that by engaging in this same conduct the Navy breached its Prime Contract with Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. (“KBR”). … V.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stimson Lumber Company v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 6, 2021

    Cl. at 665 (quoting Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 (1984)). … McCarty v. United States, 142 Fed. Cl. 616, 627 (2019).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dougherty v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 6, 2026

    Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99- 539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Lang is board certified in family medicine and integrative and holistic medicine. Ex. 20.2 at 2. While I do not doubt Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Boatwright v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 16, 2025

    Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Ellamae Phillips Co. v. United States

    77 Fed. Cl. 387 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 3, 2007

    Champagne v. United States, 35 Fed.Cl. 198, 206 (1996). … United States v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Ellamae Phillips Co. v. United States, 564 F.3d 1367 (2009)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tailor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 9, 2025

    No. 22-1820V SHEELA TAILOR, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: May 6, 2025 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City National Bank v. United States

    33 Fed. Cl. 759 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 8, 1995

    FACTS The material facts relevant to this dispute are set forth in City National Bank v. … See United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Universal Shelters of America, Inc. v. United States

    87 Fed. Cl. 127 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 12, 2009

    Indus. v. … Pastorella presented her termination for cause determination to a contract review board. Tr. at 43-45.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Obsidian Solutions Group, LLC v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 8, 2021

    (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000)). … See Forest Grove School Dist. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Standard Communications, Inc. v. United States

    106 Fed. Cl. 165 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 2, 2012

    Corp. v. … See Taucher v. Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168, 1173 (D.C.Cir.2005) (“[Tjhe government has the burden of showing that ... special circumstances make an award unjust.” (citing Air Transp. Ass’n of Can. v. Fed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Farmer v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2019

    Mitchell Brown, Columbia, SC, for plaintiffs. Thad H. Westbrook and Miles E. Coleman, of counsel. Terrance A. Mebane, with whom were Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Ruth A. Harvey, Director, Kirk T. … See Ware v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bradshaw v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 20, 2017

    See Griffith v. United States, No. 14-793C, 2015 WL 1383959, at -1.·3 (Fed. Cl. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lumetra v. United States

    84 Fed. Cl. 542 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 14, 2008

    Statistica, Inc. v. Christopher, 102 F.3d 1577, 1582 (Fed.Cir.1996); Alfa Laval Separation Inc. v. … See Information Tech. & Applications Corp. v. United States, 316 F.3d 1312, 1319 (Fed.Cir. 2003); Myers Investigative & Sec. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 275 F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed.Cir. 2002); CACI, Inc.-Fed. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Baltrush v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 28, 2025

    Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.