Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

0.48s

  • Dynacs Engineering Co. v. United States

    48 Fed. Cl. 614 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 21, 2001

    The agency’s Source Evaluation Board (SEB) then identified to both offerors the weaknesses in their respective proposals and posed related questions. … In MVM, Inc. v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Whitney v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2016

    Davis v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 105 Fed. Cl. 627, 638 (2012); see also Broekelschen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 102 Fed. … See Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09–426V, 2012 WL 952268, at *11 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 29, 2012) (awarding Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • St. Bernard Parish Government v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 4, 2016

    Danner was confronted about the difference between his approach and the Gypsum Association’s standard “Assessing Water Damage to Gypsum Board” (SPX2511) recommending: “Gypsum board that has been exposed to sewage or floodwaters … In Albrecht v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lcm Energy Solutions v. United States

    128 Fed. Cl. 728 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2016

    Co. v. United States, 557 F.3d 1332, 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (quoting Commercial Contractors v. United States, 154 F.3d 1357, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998)); accord Glendale Fed. Bank, FSB v. … Cir. 2001); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 488, 496 (2011). The Government bears the burden of proving its claim by clear and convincing evidence. Kellogg, 99 Fed. Cl. at 496.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Advanced Management Strategies Group, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2025

    Domenico Garufi v. … Harkcon stated “other individuals . . . would come on board to take over [Mr. [XXX]’s program manager] roles” on the contracts in Virginia. Tr. at 12:12–14. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anchorage, a Municipal Corporation v. United States

    119 Fed. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2015

    As a result of MarAd denying ICRC’s certified pass-through claim, ICRC bought three claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. Compl. at ¶ 72. … Sullivan v. United States, 625 F.3d 1378, 1379-80 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (citing Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2003)).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bervaldi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 15, 2019

    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Technical College of the Low Country v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2020

    BACKGROUND Detailed descriptions of the statutory and regulatory context of this case, initial acquisition of the land in question, and proceedings before the Surface Transportation Board are provided in the court … NRG Co. v. United States, 31 Fed. Cl. 659, 670 n.8 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cardiosom, L.L.C. v. United States

    115 Fed. Cl. 761 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2014

    Ass’n v. … The parties’ dispute centered on the use of the word “issue” in the regulation, id., which provided that: “Once there is a final decision on a motion . . . relating to a prior Board decision on an issue, that prior Board

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Vfa, Inc. v. United States

    118 Fed. Cl. 735 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2014

    Instead, SMS funding allocations emanate primarily from the SMS Configuration Support Panel (“CSP”) of the Installations & Environment Functional Business Governance Board. Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Supp. Mem. at 11. … Cl. 300 (2008), Google, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 661 (2011), and McAfee, Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 696 (2013).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Emery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 21, 2026

    Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Anderson v. United States

    73 Fed. Cl. 199 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 29, 2006

    to pay contractors, companies and other entities more quickly than under the then existing system and procedures, thereby diminishing the need for delinquency reports and other agency activities, resulting in across-the-board … See Fleming v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Tupitza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 2026

    Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • PSI Energy, Inc. v. United States

    59 Fed. Cl. 590 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2004

    Board of Governors v. Dimension Financial Corp., 474 U.S. 361, 373 , 106 S.Ct. 681 , 88 L.Ed.2d 691 (1986). … Nat'l Bank v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Psi Energy, Inc. And Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. United States, 411 F.3d 1347 (2005)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Allen v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2018

    First, upon receiving a recommendation for disqualification,6 the “appropriate SDDC office will review the recommendation and related facts to determine if a [Transportation Service Provider Review Board (“TRB”)] should … Lublin Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Evideo Owners v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 2016

    Ogunniyi v. United States, 124 Fed. … See Brown v. United States, 80 F. App’x 676, 678 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (holding that RCFC 60(b)(1) does not provide grounds for relief from judgment when a plaintiff argues only that the Court erroneously applied the law).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Schultz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 3, 2020

    By comparison, the incidence rate for the same periods was across-the-board higher for individuals who first experienced an infection then stroke. Id. … Messe holds several academic appointments and serves on several editorial boards. Id. at 1–3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lumetra v. United States

    84 Fed. Cl. 542 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 14, 2008

    Statistica, Inc. v. Christopher, 102 F.3d 1577, 1582 (Fed.Cir.1996); Alfa Laval Separation Inc. v. … See Information Tech. & Applications Corp. v. United States, 316 F.3d 1312, 1319 (Fed.Cir. 2003); Myers Investigative & Sec. Servs., Inc. v. United States, 275 F.3d 1366, 1370 (Fed.Cir. 2002); CACI, Inc.-Fed. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. United States

    54 Fed. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 15, 2002

    Olson v. … See also McCandless v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Laforge & Budd Construction Co. v. United States

    48 Fed. Cl. 566 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2001

    . § 605 , appealing the decision to an agency board. 41 U.S.C. § 609 . 1. … See Gardner v. Panama R.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.