Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.80s
Scott Timber Co. v. United States
97 Fed. Cl. 685 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 5, 2011
Co. v. … I used a volume of 187,000 board feet which was one line above the correct volume of 144,000 board feet....
Reversed on other grounds by Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 692 F.3d 1365 (2012)Cited 9 timesPublishedSt. Bernard Parish Government v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 4, 2016
Danner was confronted about the difference between his approach and the Gypsum Association’s standard “Assessing Water Damage to Gypsum Board” (SPX2511) recommending: “Gypsum board that has been exposed to sewage or floodwaters … In Albrecht v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson Controls World Services, Inc. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 182 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 8, 2000
See Johnson Controls World Servs., Inc. v. … Celo-tex, 477 U.S. at 325, 106 S.Ct. 2548 (1986); see also Assets Service Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLcm Energy Solutions v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 728 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2016
Co. v. United States, 557 F.3d 1332, 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (quoting Commercial Contractors v. United States, 154 F.3d 1357, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998)); accord Glendale Fed. Bank, FSB v. … Cir. 2001); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 488, 496 (2011). The Government bears the burden of proving its claim by clear and convincing evidence. Kellogg, 99 Fed. Cl. at 496.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAdvanced Management Strategies Group, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2025
Domenico Garufi v. … Harkcon stated “other individuals . . . would come on board to take over [Mr. [XXX]’s program manager] roles” on the contracts in Virginia. Tr. at 12:12–14. Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDynacs Engineering Co. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 614 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 21, 2001
The agency’s Source Evaluation Board (SEB) then identified to both offerors the weaknesses in their respective proposals and posed related questions. … In MVM, Inc. v.
Cited 33 timesPublished126 Fed. Cl. 674 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 26, 2016
In February 2012, BNSF intended to abandon the 5.95-mile railroad corridor at issue and sought abandonment authorization from the United States Surface Transportation Board (STB). … (quoting Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith, 449 U.S. 155, 161 (1980) (quoting Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972))) (omission in original). In Oregon ex rel. State Land Board v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMacHado v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 2019
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAnchorage, a Municipal Corporation v. United States
119 Fed. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2015
As a result of MarAd denying ICRC’s certified pass-through claim, ICRC bought three claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. Compl. at ¶ 72. … Sullivan v. United States, 625 F.3d 1378, 1379-80 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (citing Anderson v. United States, 344 F.3d 1343, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2003)).
Cited 8 timesPublishedTechnical College of the Low Country v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 13, 2020
BACKGROUND Detailed descriptions of the statutory and regulatory context of this case, initial acquisition of the land in question, and proceedings before the Surface Transportation Board are provided in the court … NRG Co. v. United States, 31 Fed. Cl. 659, 670 n.8 (1994).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBervaldi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 15, 2019
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedVanore v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 27, 2024
Monsell is board certified by the American Board of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery and holds a Certificate of Added Qualifications from the same board in Neurotology. Id.; Monsell CV at 1. … He is board certified by the American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery with a sub-specialty certification in Otology, Neurology, and Skull Base Surgery. Ward Rep. at 1; Ward CV at 11. Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEmery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 21, 2026
Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished73 Fed. Cl. 199 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 29, 2006
to pay contractors, companies and other entities more quickly than under the then existing system and procedures, thereby diminishing the need for delinquency reports and other agency activities, resulting in across-the-board … See Fleming v.
Cited 5 timesPublished118 Fed. Cl. 735 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 29, 2014
Instead, SMS funding allocations emanate primarily from the SMS Configuration Support Panel (“CSP”) of the Installations & Environment Functional Business Governance Board. Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Supp. Mem. at 11. … Cl. 300 (2008), Google, Inc. v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 661 (2011), and McAfee, Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 696 (2013).
Cited 7 timesPublishedEvideo Owners v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 16, 2016
Ogunniyi v. United States, 124 Fed. … See Brown v. United States, 80 F. App’x 676, 678 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (holding that RCFC 60(b)(1) does not provide grounds for relief from judgment when a plaintiff argues only that the Court erroneously applied the law).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTupitza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 2026
Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2018
First, upon receiving a recommendation for disqualification,6 the “appropriate SDDC office will review the recommendation and related facts to determine if a [Transportation Service Provider Review Board (“TRB”)] should … Lublin Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPSI Energy, Inc. v. United States
59 Fed. Cl. 590 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 1, 2004
Board of Governors v. Dimension Financial Corp., 474 U.S. 361, 373 , 106 S.Ct. 681 , 88 L.Ed.2d 691 (1986). … Nat'l Bank v.
Reversed on other grounds by Psi Energy, Inc. And Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. United States, 411 F.3d 1347 (2005)Cited 5 timesPublishedWalters v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 2, 2021
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … See Rochester v. United States, 18 Cl.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna