Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
0.92s
Lcm Energy Solutions v. United States
128 Fed. Cl. 728 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2016
Co. v. United States, 557 F.3d 1332, 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (quoting Commercial Contractors v. United States, 154 F.3d 1357, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998)); accord Glendale Fed. Bank, FSB v. … Cir. 2001); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 488, 496 (2011). The Government bears the burden of proving its claim by clear and convincing evidence. Kellogg, 99 Fed. Cl. at 496.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGerhardt v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 23, 2014
She is board-certified in allergy-immunology and internal medicine, and has taught and conducted extensive research in the fields of immunology, allergology, and vaccinology. … Andreu v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 569 F.3d 1367, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2009). V. Analysis A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 7, 2016
Davis, Case No. 54202 (May 13, 2015) (Board of Disciplinary Appeals, Judgment of Indefinite Disability Suspension). … RCFC lO(a); see also United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished81 Fed. Cl. 328 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2008
See id. at 495 (citing Amchem Prods., Inc. v. … Drivers Ass’n v. Arctic Express, Inc., 288 F.Supp.2d 895, 901-03 (S.D.Ohio 2003); Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 146 F.R.D. 1, 3-5 (D.D.C. 1992).
Cited 34 timesPublishedZeroavia, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 11, 2022
In evaluating the subfactors, the Source Evaluation Board (“SEB”) would independently evaluate each offeror’s mission suitability volume to identify all significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses … Dyck v. Albertelli Law, 98 Fed. Cl. 624, 630 (2011).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 5, 2022
See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976); Haines v. … See 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (granting the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction to hear claims against the United States for money damages “not sounding in tort”); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished122 Fed. Cl. 230 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 27, 2015
Strag v. Board of Trustees, 55 F.3d 943, 948 (4th Cir. 1995) (quoting Houck v. Virginia Polytechnical Inst., 10 F.3d 204, 206 (4th Cir. 1973)); see also Santiago, 107 Fed. Cl. at 158; Moorehead v. United States, 88 Fed. … International Board of Teamsters, 177 F.3d 1076, 1080 (8th Cir. 1999) (“The standard governing a claim of unequal pay for equal work is the same for Title VII and for the Equal Pay Act.”). But in Peters v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedVelocity Training, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 9, 2022
M & N to Compl., in response to GSA’s assessment of a deficiency due to the lack of Commercial Airlift Review Board (CARB) certification documentation, Ex. A to Compl. at 1–2; Compl. ¶¶ 27–28. … See NVE, Inc. v. United States, 121 Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAllard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 3, 2020
He is board certified in rheumatology, allergy, and clinical immunology. Id. at 2. … He is board certified in anatomical and clinical pathology. He has been a Professor of Immunology at the University of Texas at San Antonio since 2005. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCardona v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 14, 2026
Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). … Fox v. Vice, 563 U.S. 826, 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205, 180 L.Ed.2d 45 (2011). Instead, in appropriate circumstances they may make reasonable, across-the-board percentage adjustments.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBiltmore Forest Broadcasting FM, Inc. v. United States
80 Fed. Cl. 322 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 25, 2008
United States, 823 F.2d 510 (Fed.Cir.1987), the Interior Board of Land Appeals determined that the plaintiff had no ownership rights in the property. … United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839 , 116 S.Ct. 2432 , 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996) concerned con- *331 tracts with the Federal Home Loan Bank Board over regulatory accounting.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFru-Con Construction Corp. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 298 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 1999
Co. v. … Co., Inc. v.
Cited 198 timesPublishedRivers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 4, 2019
Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedValdes v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
89 Fed. Cl. 415 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2009
(citing Savin v. … Geier is board certified in epidemiology, a field in which even the Special Master conceded would be well-suited for an expert in Petitioner’s case.
Cited 59 timesPublishedTpmc-Energysolutions Environmental Services 2008, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2025
Grimberg Co. stated that “[t]he Board found that Grimberg’s reliance on just two borings, DH-11 and DH-12, was unreasonable” and quoted the Board in a parenthetical citation, stating “[c]onfronted with the plethora of cautionary … Grimberg Co. reversed the Board’s decision but did not disturb the Board’s determination that the plaintiff’s reliance on just two borings was unreasonable. See United States Army Corps of Eng’rs v. John C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWhitney v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 26, 2016
Davis v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 105 Fed. Cl. 627, 638 (2012); see also Broekelschen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 102 Fed. … See Brown v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 09–426V, 2012 WL 952268, at *11 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 29, 2012) (awarding Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedScott Timber Co. v. United States
97 Fed. Cl. 685 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 5, 2011
Co. v. … I used a volume of 187,000 board feet which was one line above the correct volume of 144,000 board feet....
Reversed on other grounds by Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 692 F.3d 1365 (2012)Cited 9 timesPublishedEastern Minerals International, Inc. v. United States
36 Fed. Cl. 541 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 2, 1996
DSM denied the permit in 1984, and Eastern appealed to the Tennessee Board of Reclamation Review. … Store Safe Redlands Associates v.
Reversed on other grounds by Anne D. Wyatt v. United States, 271 F.3d 1090 (2001)Cited 12 timesPublishedSt. Bernard Parish Government v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 4, 2016
Danner was confronted about the difference between his approach and the Gypsum Association’s standard “Assessing Water Damage to Gypsum Board” (SPX2511) recommending: “Gypsum board that has been exposed to sewage or floodwaters … In Albrecht v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson Controls World Services, Inc. v. United States
48 Fed. Cl. 182 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 8, 2000
See Johnson Controls World Servs., Inc. v. … Celo-tex, 477 U.S. at 325, 106 S.Ct. 2548 (1986); see also Assets Service Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna