Case law

Hedrick v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 13, 2019

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.

Soldevila-Cuesta v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 14, 2018

Melendez Camilo v. United States, 642 F.3d 1040, 1044 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (quoting Heisig v. United States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1156 (Fed. Cir. 1983)); see also Volk v. United States, 111 Fed. … The regulation also addresses referrals to a medical evaluation board (“MEB”) and a physical evaluation board (“PEB”) and provides, in relevant part, that: Soldiers with conditions listed in this chapter who do not

Bohatch v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 21, 2019

Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.

Kanehl v. United States

41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,160 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 14, 1997

Subsequently, Dri-Mix’s trustee in bankruptcy made a timely appeal of the terminations for default to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA). The value of these claims was approximately $4.6 million. … The subcontractor took its case to the Engineering Board of Contract Appeals (EBCA) in December 1980. Id. The EBCA did not issue an opinion for five years. Id.

First Federal Lincoln Bank v. United States

58 Fed. Cl. 363 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 6, 2003

Gorp. v. United States, 55 Fed.Cl. 595, 620 (2003). … First Commerce Corp. v. United States, 53 Fed.Cl. 38, 42 (2002).

Connor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 31, 2025

No. 24-0060V AMANDA CONNOR, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: September 24, 2025 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Travelers Insurance v. United States

46 Fed. Cl. 458 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 13, 2000

Co. v. … Chadbourn rev., Little, Brown and Co.1972).

American Federal Bank, FSB v. United States

74 Fed. Cl. 208 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2006

Corp. v. … First, the phase-out schedule set out in the Bank Board’s regulations in effect at the time, 12 C.F.R. § 561.13 (c)(2) (1988), was given effect.

Dunn v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 19, 2019

(discussing the effect of a military correction board remedy on the statute of limitations). … Brown v. United States, 73 F.3d 1100, 1102 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (referencing several cases, including Bacon v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 441 (1961)).

Sacramento Grazing Ass'n v. United States

66 Fed. Cl. 211 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2005

The United States Supreme Court held in Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … Co. v.

Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 4, 2022

Sheikh is a board-certified Neurologist. Curriculum Vitae, filed as Ex. 20 at 2 (ECF No. 31-2) (“Sheikh CV”). … He is also a member of the advisory board for the GBS/CIDP Foundation, and has been elected to the Board of Directors of Peripheral Nerve Society. Sheikh CV at 5.

Schultz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 3, 2020

By comparison, the incidence rate for the same periods was across-the-board higher for individuals who first experienced an infection then stroke. Id. … Messe holds several academic appointments and serves on several editorial boards. Id. at 1–3.

Creppel v. United States

33 Fed. Cl. 590 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 28, 1995

Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 149-50 n. 3, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 1725 n. 3, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). … United States v.

Resource Investments, Inc. v. United States

93 Fed. Cl. 373 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 4, 2010

Roby v. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 290 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

CHESHIRE HUNT, INC. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 19, 2025

.”); Bauman v. … Lumber Co. v.

Davies v. United States

31 Fed. Cl. 769 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 30, 1994

See Standard Oil Co. v. … Brown v. Davis, 116 U.S. 237, 249 , 6 S.Ct. 379, 385 , 29 L.Ed. 659 (1886). The court holds that the plaintiff cannot demonstrate that the accused devices perform a function identical to the one at issue.

Westinghouse Electric Co. v. United States

56 Fed. Cl. 564 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 5, 2003

On August 15,2000, LLC filed an appeal of the contracting officer’s decision with the DOE Board of Contract Appeals (“EBCA”). … Johnson Controls World Servs., Inc. v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 334, 343 (1999). See Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States, 256 U.S. 655, 657 , 41 S.Ct. 611 , 65 L.Ed. 1149 (1921); see also Rel-Reeves, Inc. v.

Maryland Enterprise, L.L.C. v. United States

93 Fed. Cl. 658 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 14, 2010

No. 3 v. United States, 55 Fed.Cl. 334, 337 (2003); see also Bishop v. … The 1992 amendments to the Tucker Act, however, restored the jurisdictional parity between the United States Court of Federal Claims and Boards of Contract Appeals in this regard. PI.

Maracalin v. United States

52 Fed. Cl. 736 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 17, 2002

Ponder v. … United States, 508 U.S. 200, 214 , 113 S.Ct. 2035 , 124 L.Ed.2d 118 (1993); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed.Cir.1998); Brown v.

Superior Optical Labs, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 2, 2021

Corp. v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 57, 65 (2001), and the corrective action need only be “reasonable under the circumstances.” Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United States, 107 Fed. … Application & Techs., Inc. v. United States, 691 F.3d 1374, 1382-83 (Fed.