Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.83s

  • D'Angiolini v. Hhs

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 28, 2014

    Broekelschen v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 618 F.3d 1339, 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2010), Lombardi v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 656 F.3d 1343, 1352 (Fed. … See Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 397 F.3d 878 (10th Cir. 2005) (affirming exclusion of evidence and grant of summary judgment); but see Hopkins v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Forbes v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 4, 2019

    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Faerber v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2021

    Killip v. Off. of Pers. … See Russello v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Metzger v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2025

    No. 22-1715V STACI METZGER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: February 25, 2025 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Advanced Management Strategies Group, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 20, 2025

    Domenico Garufi v. … Harkcon stated “other individuals . . . would come on board to take over [Mr. [XXX]’s program manager] roles” on the contracts in Virginia. Tr. at 12:12–14. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Heights Bank, FSB v. United States

    51 Fed. Cl. 659 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2001

    For the reasons set forth below and in Centex Corp. v. … Those cases, Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 226 F.3d 1334 (Fed.Cir.2000), McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States, 182 F.3d 1319 (Fed.Cir.1999), Wetsel-Oviatt Lumber Co. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Davis v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2019

    No. 19-671C Filed: November 1, 2019 NOT FOR PUBLICATION ) CHRISTOPHER BROWN … Factual Background Plaintiff, pro se, Cln·istopher Brown, a/k/a Christopher Davis, commenced this action on May 1, 2019. See generally Comp!.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lundgren v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 10, 2026

    No. 24-0277V RICHARD LUNDGREN, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: April 24, 2026 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McGuinness v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 15, 2021

    Lightfoot, a board-certified rheumatologist, testified on behalf of Respondent, and submitted a single expert report. See generally Tr. at 75– 105; Report, dated Feb. 19, 2019, filed as Ex. … He is not board-certified in the U.S., however, because he did not go through a residency program. Id. at 108–09. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Intuitive Research and Technology Corporation v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 10, 2021

    Banknote Corp. of Am., Inc. v. United States, 365 F.3d 1345,1350–51 (Fed. Cir. 2004). … Marine (ASIA), PTE Ltd. v. United States, 720 F.3d 901, 907 (Fed. Cir. 2013)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Aguilar v. United States

    124 Fed. Cl. 9 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 26, 2015

    E.g., United States v. … See, e.g., SUFI Network Servs., Inc. v. United States, 785 F.3d 585, 589 (Fed. Cir. 2015); Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 109 Fed. Cl. 288, 299 n.8 (2013).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hull v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 27, 2019

    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Whitmore v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2023

    Kenyon v. United States, 683 F. App’x 945, 948 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (affirming the dismissal of a pro se prisoner complaint in this Court) (first citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … Cir. 2012) (per curiam)); Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 (citing United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 2–3 (1969)). This Court has no power to order Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Casa De Cambio Comdiv S.A. de C.V. v. United States

    48 Fed. Cl. 137 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 27, 2000

    See also Brown v. United States, 86 F.3d 1554, 1564 (Fed.Cir.1996) (“[t]he substantive law mandating compensation may be either express or implied, but it must be unambiguous”). … Corp. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Whitmore v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 27, 2023

    Kenyon v. United States, 683 F. App’x 945, 948 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (affirming the dismissal of a pro se prisoner complaint in this Court) (first citing Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. … Cir. 2012) (per curiam)); Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 (citing United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 2–3 (1969)). This Court has no power to order Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Smith v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 26, 2019

    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • O Diah v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 3, 2016

    See Brown, 105 F.3d at 623; LeBlanc v. United States, 50 F.3d 1025,1028 (Fed. Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the Court lacks jurisdiction over Mr. … See United States v. Connolly,716 F.2d 882, 886- 87 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (First Amendment); Brown, 105 F .3d at 623 (Fourth Amendment); Dupre v. United States ,229 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Dillingham Construction, N.A. v. United States

    40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,827 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 31, 1995

    Corp. v. United States, 973 F.2d 1572, 1579 (Fed.Cir.1992); Hamza v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 315, 320 (1994). … See Willetts v. Ford Motor Co., 583 F.2d 852, 856 (6th Cir.1978); Tunnell v. Wiley, 514 F.2d 971, 976 (3d Cir.1975).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Metts v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 7, 2018

    Metts v. … United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 886-87 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Our jurisdiction does not include claims based on criminal violations. Sanders v. United States, 252 F.3d 1329, 1333-34 (Fed. Cir. 2001); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nicholson v. United States

    29 Fed. Cl. 180 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 29, 1993

    Nash, Jr., Administration of Government Contracts 102-03 (2d ed. 1986) (hereinafter Cibinic & Nash, Administration) (“Courts and boards follow no predetermined, well-defined analytical framework when giving a contract meaning … United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 707, 716 (1992); see generally Cibinic & Nash, Administration, at 104 (“Since it is rarely possible to discern what was in the minds of the parties, courts and boards must often rely upon a so called

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.