Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

1.46s

  • Hitkansut LLC, a Michigan Corporation, & Acceledyne Technologies, Ltd., LLC, a Michigan Corporation v. United States

    111 Fed. Cl. 228 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 28, 2013

    Baldrige v. … Lamie v. United States Tr., 540 U.S. 526, 534 (2004); see also In re Any & All Funds or Other Assets in Brown Bros. Harriman & Co. Account No. 8870792 in Name of Tiger Eye Invs., Ltd., 601 F.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Schaeffer v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 17, 2021

    Cir. 2005) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction a claim a non-government employee brought for a denial of security clearance before the Merit System Protection Board on the ground an employee of a private government contractor … Brown, 913 F.2d 1399, 1401 (9th Cir. 1990) (citing Dept. of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 527 (1988)) (“The decision to grant or revoke a security clearance is committed to the discretion of the President by law.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Fullerton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 28, 2021

    FULLERTON, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: April 28, 2021 v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 On April 30, 2019, Julie A.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Nutrite Corp. v. United States

    43 Fed. Cl. 297 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 1999

    Id. at 109 (quoting Bell v. … . § 1491 (a)(1) (1994); see Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997); Golden Pacific Bancorp. v. United States, 15 F.3d 1066 , 1069 n. 8 (Fed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hirmiz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 7, 2017

    .’”); Tolbert v. … Cir. 1991) (commenting that the court was in “a better position . . . to determine the amount of fees and expenses” than the Merit Systems Protection Board, in connection with a review of a decision of that Board).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zervas v. United States

    30 Fed. Cl. 443 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 16, 1994

    In OPM v. … Zervas v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 66 (1993); Zervas v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 1425 (1992). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bragg v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2021

    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. … BRAGG, Petitioner, No. 18-890V Special Master Horner v. ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters: 1.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • SP Systems, Inc. v. United States

    86 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 2009

    Bliss Co. v. … Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Davis v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 10, 2015

    Davis, Case No. 54202, (May 13, 2015) (Board of Disciplinary Appeals, Judgment oflndefinite Disability Suspension). … Kroll v. Finnerty, 242 F.3d 1359, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (quoting Hagans v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States

    50 Fed. Cl. 35 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 30, 2001

    There is a total of 52 major contracts with a volume of 103 million board feet that has been sold. Another 35 planned sales currently on hold include 61 million board feet. … Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724, 729 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citing Woodcrest Construction Co. v. United States, 187 Ct.Cl. 249 , 408 F.2d 406, 411 (Ct.Cl.1969)).

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States, 596 F.3d 817 (2010)Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Bowles v. United States

    31 Fed. Cl. 37 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 24, 1994

    See Bowles v. … See Lucas v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Frawner Corporation v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 8, 2022

    Tab 41 (Source Selection Evaluation Board Report (December 8, 2021)) at AR 2642-43. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barlow v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 11, 2019

    See Haggart v. United States, 89 Fed. Cl. 523, 529 (2009) (citing King v. United States, 84 Fed. … Courval, et al. v. United States, 140 Fed. Cl. 133, 139 (2018) (citing Christensen v. United States, 65 Fed. Cl. 625, 629 (2005)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    27 Fed. Cl. 384 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 7, 1992

    Thomas v. Secretary of the Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 90-2022 V, slip. op. at 4, 1992 WL 210077 (Cl.Ct.Sp.Mstr. Aug. 14, 1992). … In examining the meaning of that term, the Supreme Court, in Board of Educ. of the Hendrick Hudson Cent. School Dist. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Plasan North America, Inc. v. United States

    109 Fed. Cl. 561 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 2013

    LLC v. … B3H, 75 F.3d 1577 , 1580 (Fed.Cir.1996) (Board of Contract Appeals should defer to agency’s best value decision as long as it is “grounded in reason ... even if the Board itself might have chosen a different proposal.”).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • C.R. Pittman Construction Co. v. United States

    92 Fed. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 10, 2010

    “Part of the Permanent Work” First, the parties agree that the Board for Contract Appeals has interpreted “permanent work” to be work that is the “chief purpose of the contract.” E.g. … Utility Contractors Inc. v. United States, 8 Cl.Ct. 42 , 48 n. 5 (1985).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Rooks v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services

    35 Fed. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 1996

    See, e.g., Jones v. Brown, 41 F.3d 634, 637 (Fed.Cir.1994). If the plain meaning of the language is clear, it will be regarded as conclusive. See Staples v. … Schafer v. American Cyanamid Co., 20 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.1994).

    Cited 192 timesPublished
  • Walker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 3, 2022

    Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. … See generally Beck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Anne Brooks Brauer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 29, 2013

    Perreira v. Sec’y of HHS, 27 Fed. Cl. 29, 34 (1992), aff’d, 33 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1994); see also Saxton ex rel. Saxton v. Sec’y of HHS, 3 F.3d 1517, 1519 (Fed. … See Long v. Sec’y of HHS, No. 94-310V, 1995 WL 1093129, at *1 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Oct. 27, 1995) (finding that a non-attorney pro se petitioner was not entitled to attorneys’ fees); see also Kay v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Engineered Demolition, Inc. v. United States

    70 Fed. Cl. 580 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 28, 2006

    See Reflectone, Inc. v. … See General Bronze Corp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.