Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

0.50s

  • Stephens v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2022

    Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … With regard to reasonable basis, Petitioner submitted two expert reports from Vera Byers, MD, PhD, who is board certified in internal medicine. Ex. 16 (hereinafter “Byers CV”) at 4. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • McClain v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 19, 2024

    Sherwood, 312 U.S. at 588 (“[I]f the relief sought is against others than the United States the suit as to them must be ignored as beyond the jurisdiction of the court.”); Brown v. … Any action challenging the denial of social security benefits must be brought in federal district court after a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. 42 U.S.C. § 405; Brown v. United States, 607 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • B&B Medical Services, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 22, 2014

    But see Honig v. … Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243 (Fed. Cir. 1996). Nevertheless, the Court of Federal Claims and other Article I courts traditionally have applied the “case or controversy” justiciability doctrines. See id.; Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Calvin v. United States

    63 Fed. Cl. 468 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 12, 2005

    Horner v. … Acosta, 803 F.2d 687, 694 (Fed.Cir.1986) (holding that the absence of an SF 50 or other indicia of appointment supported the Merit Systems Protection Board’s finding that certain contract employees were not appointed in the

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Valle Ex Rel. J v. v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

    127 Fed. Cl. 515 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 9, 2016

    United States v. Kwai Fun lYong, _U.5. _, _, 135 S. Ct. 1625,1632 (2015); see also Sebelius v. Auburn Reg'l Med. Cnft., 568 U.S. _, _, 133 S. Ct. 817 (2013); Henderson ex rel. Henderson v. … Ct. at 1638 (citing lrwin v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United States

    119 Fed. Cl. 368 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 31, 2014

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., 229 F.3d 1120, 1130 (Fed. Cir. 2000); see also Ormco Corp. v. Align Tech., Inc., 463 F.3d 1299, 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2006). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 229 F.3d at 1130.

    Reversed on other grounds by Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United States, 835 F.3d 1388 (2016)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • E-NUMERATE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 26, 2026

    P. 26(c) advisory committee’s note to 1970 amendment)); Brown Bag Software v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ambase Corp. v. United States

    100 Fed. Cl. 548 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2011

    Bank, FSB v. United States, 597 F.3d 1356, 1361 (Fed.Cir.2010); see also Glendale Fed. Bank, FSB v. … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Advanced Powder Solutions, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 13, 2022

    Stobil Enter. v. … Veterans Affs., CBCA 5698-R, 20-1 BCA ¶ 37,521 (discussing FAR 4.804-1(c)(1) and “not[ing] that, even if the agency closed the contract file prematurely, appellant has not demonstrated why such action would be material to the Board

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Sheridan Corp. v. United States

    94 Fed. Cl. 663 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 13, 2010

    On March 10, 2010, the agency’s Source Selection Evaluation Board (“SSEB”) com *667 pleted its evaluation of the eight proposals. AR 489-509, 519. … Corp. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Hirsch v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2021

    The Court, interpreting the applicable statute, found that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) did not err when it found that the plaintiff’s reserve service during law school was properly included … Biery v. United States, 818 F.3d 704, 711 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (quoting Young v. United States, 94 Fed. Cl. 671, 674 (2010)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowersox v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 7, 2018

    Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (en bane) (quoting Nager Elec. Co. v. United States, 368 F.2d 847, 851 (Ct. Cl. 1966)). … and the correction board enters a final decision denying relief."

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United States

    49 Fed. Cl. 57 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 15, 2001

    The determination as to whether a proposal is deficient to that extent is made at the discretion of the Evaluation Board. … In making such a determination, the Board will consider such things as the number and severity of the deficiencies. Id. at 7.

    Cited 148 timesPublished
  • Lumbermens Mutual Casualty v. United States

    70 Fed. Cl. 94 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 3, 2006

    Co. v. … Plaintiff also relies on Murphy v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Abbey v. United States

    89 Fed. Cl. 425 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 14, 2009

    Abbey v. Unit *428 ed States, 82 Fed.Cl. 722 (2008). … In Motion College Board of Trustees v. Cicero, the Northern District of Illinois found certification untimely after a three-month delay. 25 F.Supp.2d 882, 885 (N.D.Ill.1998).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Veridyne Corp. v. United States

    105 Fed. Cl. 769 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 6, 2012

    See generally Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 99 Fed.Cl. 488, 514-16 (2011) (order granting motion to dismiss counterclaims). … Marcus v.

    Modified by Veridyne Corp. v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 762 (2012)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 18, 2020

    Levin is a board-certified immunologist and pathologist. Levin CV at 1–2, filed Nov. 27, 2017, as Ex. 12 (ECF No. 13-3); Tr. at 34. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993)). And similar to the 2015 vaccination, the record of the 2013 flu vaccine administration also memorializes Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nieves v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 22, 2023

    He is board certified in Neurology by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and is currently employed by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York as an active physician in the Department … He is board certified in psychiatry/neurology as well as electrodiagnostic medicine. Callaghan CV at 1. Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hydraulics International, Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 15, 2020

    Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United States, 609 F.3d 1323, 1327–28 (Fed. Cir. 2010). … Rudolph & Sletten, Inc. v. United States, 120 Fed. Cl. 137, 143–44 (2015); see also 41 U.S.C. § 7103(f)(2).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lusk v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2022

    MASTERS No. 18-1571V Filed: March 22, 2022 UNPUBLISHED MICHAEL LUSK, Petitioner, ; Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Guillain- SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) HUMAN SERVICES, V. … Mallori Browne Openchowski , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.