Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,740 results
0.60s
Labat-Anderson, Inc. v. United States
42 Fed. Cl. 806 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 29, 1999
Mofolo, was qualified to develop and manage financial systems/accounts. … Tarr is extremely well qualified to carry out this position.... Mr. Tarr ... joined us during our best and final interviews.
Cited 62 timesPublished93 Fed. Cl. 563 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 18, 2010
Plaintiffs argue that RCFC 23(a)’s four requirements are clearly met. Pis. Mot. at 2. … First, class counsel must be “qualified, experienced and generally able to conduct the litigation.” In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc., 960 F.2d 285 , 291 (2d Cir.1992).
Cited 9 timesPublished43 Fed. Cl. 611 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 1999
motion to compel the production of these documents, giving rise to the following questions: (i) did Oneida’s counsel waive its objections to providing all or some of the withheld documents; (ii) are some of these documents immune … The Hickman rule came to be known as the “work product doctrine” and is codified in RCFC 26(b)(2). 11 This rule “establishes a qualified privilege for materials prepared by counsel in anticipation of litigation and offers
Cited 3 timesPublishedAgma Security Service, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 16, 2021
Cir. 2012) (explaining that the Tucker Act expressly waives sovereign immunity for claims against the United States in bid protests). … And so, while a plaintiff need not show that it would have received the award in a competition, a plaintiff must show that it would have been a qualified bidder to establish standing.” PTC, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 13, 2017
Congress did not allow AIARMA to explicitly waive sovereign immunity, or authorize the tribal justice systems to review actions of the Secretary. 25 U.S.C. § 3712(d). … The Plaintiffs’ amended complaint clearly alleges that the BIA committed an “unlawful termination and breach of lease agreements” contrary to 25 C.F.R. §§ 162.247-162.256. Am. Compl. ¶ 32.
Cited 0 timesPublishedYoung v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 18, 2014
Avera clearly held that interim awards are permissible. Avera, 515 F.3d at 1352. … Petitioners have not established a reasonable basis to proceed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished50 Fed. Cl. 3 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 18, 2001
By said opinion, the court clearly requested specific and numbered findings of fact necessary for it to render a supportable decision. Id. … Absent a clearly expressed legislative intention to the contrary, that language must ordinarily be regarded as conclusive.” Consumer Prod. Safety Comm’n v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedForest Properties, Inc. v. United States
39 Fed. Cl. 56 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 6, 1997
This nation clearly has a legitimate public welfare duty to preserve the nation’s wetlands, and it is a worthy national goal. … Thus, FPI knew, at the time of purchase, that it would have to qualify for a section 404 permit in order to develop the lakebottom property in accordance with its plans.
Cited 21 timesPublishedElectronic On-Ramp, Inc. v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 515 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 30, 2015
Shortly thereafter, two unsuccessful offerors lodged protests with the Small Business Administration (SBA), asserting that Premier did not properly qualify as a business entitled to participate in the 8(a) program. … Consequently, EOR has failed to establish the merit of its claims by showing any error, prejudicial or otherwise, in the procurement process.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAgma Security Service, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 15, 2021
Croix location established in October 2017, and a St. Thomas location established in February 2018, with a total of 113 permanent employees in the two locations. Id. at 1–4. … Cir. 2012) (explaining that the Tucker Act expressly waives sovereign immunity for claims against the United States in bid protests).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited Affiliates Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 29, 2019
Accordingly, Rule 9(i) applies the familiar Twombly and Iqbal notice pleading standards to the takings context and does not establish a heightened requirement. … Cir. 2009) (“The right to develop one’s land is clearly cognizable.”); Cienega Gardens v. United States, 331 F.3d 1319, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (“[T]he right to mine . . . [is] inherent in . . . ownership rights.”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 1, 2021
The burden is on 14 the plaintiff to prove such error through “cogent and clearly convincing evidence.” Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. … To establish the Court’s jurisdiction, Plaintiff relies on the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C § 204, as the relevant money-mandating statute.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCabrera v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2017
It short, his signs and symptoms did not fit clearly into any one category and it seems likely that the cause of his disease did not fit clearly into one end of the spectrum or the other either. … presentation to the immune system.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 13, 2017
Congress did not allow AIARMA to explicitly waive sovereign immunity, or authorize the tribal justice systems to review actions of the Secretary. 25 U.S.C. § 3712(d). … The Plaintiffs’ amended complaint clearly alleges that the BIA committed an “unlawful termination and breach of lease agreements” contrary to 25 C.F.R. §§ 162.247-162.256. Am. Compl. ¶ 32.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLaidlaw Environmental Services (GS), Inc. v. United States
43 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,436 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 24, 1999
In enacting the CDA, Congress waived its traditional sovereign immunity. Fidelity Constr. Co. v. United States, 700 F.2d 1379, 1383 (Fed.Cir.1983). … The stipulations must be comprehensive and the fact that any matter may have been established during discovery by admission or otherwise is not grounds for omitting it from stipulation.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPalantir Usg, Inc. v. United States
129 Fed. Cl. 218 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 3, 2016
Cl. at 474, that “[t]his discretionary language – ‘to the maximum extent practicable [sic] - qualifies the agency’s obligations.” … And, clearly, when the Army issued Request for Proposals No.
Cited 21 timesPublishedSheets v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · May 29, 2019
furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly … can result in immune-mediated harm to otherwise healthy tissues.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedCrespo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 6, 2017
N.S. received the DTaP, Hib, and PC immunizations on March 1, 2013. 3. The vaccines were administered within the United States. 4. … y stated and clearly agreed to.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAhtna Logistics LLC. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2022
Cl. 275, 287–88 (2022) (“In order to be successful in a bid protest, a protestor must establish prejudice twice. First, it must establish prejudice as part of the standing inquiry. . . . … The SSA clearly intended to write “Ahtna and Paragon” in that sentence, not “Ahtna and AIP.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedDingle v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 24, 2014
Petitioner filed a response on December 20, 2013, approximately one week after the deadline established in the November 15, 2013 Order. Id. … Petitioner “bears the burden of establishing the hours expended.” Wasson v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna