Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
2.26s
Lau v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 16, 2024
Jamieson is a board-certified neurologist licensed in New York. Resp. Ex. A, Tab 1 at 2. … Fine needle aspiration “yielded murky, brown, viscous fluid,” and “the residual mass was also aspirated.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished71 Fed. Cl. 278 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 8, 2006
See Splane v. … Co. v. United States, 124 F.3d 1471, 1479 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citations omitted), farther proceedings, 307 F.3d 1374 (Fed.Cir.2002); Hercules v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedProfessional Services Supplier, Inc. v. United States
45 Fed. Cl. 808 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 21, 2000
Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); California ex rel. Dep’t of Transp. v. … Capital Corp. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedGonzalez-McCaulley Investment Group, Inc. v. United States
93 Fed. Cl. 710 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 3, 2010
Taylor Consultants, Inc. v. United States, 90 Fed.Cl. 531, 536 (2009) (citing Fisher v. … The contractor may then appeal the decision of the contracting officer or the deemed denial to the agency’s board of contract appeals or to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. 41 U.S.C. §§ 606 , 609(a).
Cited 133 timesPublishedWhitfield v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 15, 2021
Brown, who ultimately determined that “he would not be willing to make a medical Opinion on this matter,” and, furthermore, “that Dr Brown had said he didn’t believe that I would find ‘Any,’ medical expert staff or physician … Browns statements as “[i]mplying or speaking on a possible unspoken Alliance between medical staff and Physicians for their fellow physicians.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedGarcia Carranza v. United States
67 Fed. Cl. 106 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 29, 2005
See Todd v. … v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSCOTT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 16, 2024
See Kastl v. … Brown, RN. The undersigned has reviewed the requested costs and finds them to be reasonable. Petitioners also requests attorneys’ cost for six experts.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 6, 2017
also convened a hearing to determine whether the Board should impose the same discipline on plaintiff as imposed by the Indiana Supreme Court. … The Virginia Board elected not to impose reciprocal discipline on plaintiff. 14 Moreover, this court does not have jurisdiction over plaintiff's takings claims because
Cited 0 timesPublishedThermalon Industries, Ltd. v. United States
51 Fed. Cl. 464 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 16, 2002
V 1999) (the “CDA”). See Busby Sch. of N. Cheyenne Tribe v. … Ryan-Walsh, Inc. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,862 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 15, 1995
See Rhoades v. … School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974), applies to the retroactivity of jurisdictional and procedural provisions, such as statutes of limitations); see Garfield v. J.C.
Cited 11 timesPublishedJWK International Corp. v. United States
49 Fed. Cl. 371 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 10, 2001
See e.g., Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.Cir.1997) (upholding trial Court’s dismissal of plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction). … Ltd. v. United States, 387 F.2d 957 , 181 Ct.Cl. 774 (1967). . This conclusion is also supported under the more restrictive standards applicable in proceedings before the General Service Board of Contract Appeals.
Cited 46 timesPublishedNorthrop Grumman Corp. v. United States
47 Fed. Cl. 20 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 16, 2000
Bedar of Marine Corps Tactical Systems Support Activity (“MCTSSA”) was a member of the Cost Evaluation Board. The Technical Evaluation Board (the “TEB”), composed of Maj. Guy, Maj. Bedar, Col. Robert Speights, and Col. … V.
Cited 44 timesPublishedPedigo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 12, 2025
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent. DECISION ON ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS 1 On March 8, 2024, Kerryington P. … Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished47 Fed. Cl. 353 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 16, 2000
New Valley Corp. v. … Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 132 F.3d 724, 734 (Fed.Cir. 1997).
Cited 5 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 23, 2026
See, e.g., Brown v. Wickey, No. 4:25-cv-01045-JSD, 2025 WL 3227553 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 19, 2025); Complaint, Anderson, No. 25-1544, 2025 WL 3720429 (Fed. Cl. Dec. 23, 2025). … See Boeing Co. v. United States, 968 F.3d 1371, 1383 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (quoting Shapiro v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedBohn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 21, 2021
Miller is board certified in anatomic pathology and neuropathology by the American Board of Pathology. (Ex. 21, p. 3.) Dr. … She is also a diplomate of the National Board of Medical Examiners and the American Board of Pathology (Anatomic, Clinical, and Pediatric Pathology). (Id. at 13.) In evaluating G.B.’s case, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublished128 Fed. Cl. 635 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 19, 2016
See Collier v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 354, 356-58 (2003), ajf'd, Collier v. United States, 379 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2004). … States v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 30, 2014
See Greenhill v. United States,8l Fed. Cl. 786,790 (2008) (citing t1e nke v. (lnited Stares, 60 F.3d 79s,799 (Fed. Cir. 199s)). … . $ 1a9l(a)(l) (limiting the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims to claims "against the United States"); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAgma Security Service, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 15, 2021
In other words, the board did not meet again to conduct a new technical evaluation of AGMA’s and Ranger’s proposals. … In other words, the board did not meet again to conduct a new technical evaluation of AGMA’s and Ranger’s proposals.
Cited 0 timesPublishedErvin & Associates, Inc. v. United States
44 Fed. Cl. 646 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 1999
After determining that plaintiffs’ proposal was in the competitive range HUD’s Source Evaluation Board recommended that plaintiffs be awarded a Due Diligence II contract. … Dunlap, in contravention of HUD procedures, overruled the Board’s recommendation and awarded the contract to another team. According to plaintiffs, this team was not a qualifying firm.
Cited 9 timesPublished
Ask Donna