Case law

Carlos Peterson v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 22, 2014

See United States v. … (citations omitted); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997), reh’g denied (1997); Smith v. United States, 99 Fed. Cl. 581, 583-84 (2011) (citing Moore v. Pub. Defender’s Office, 76 Fed.

Pennzoil-quaker State Co. & Subsidiaries v. United States

62 Fed. Cl. 689 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 28, 2004

For instance, regarding the first canon, the Federal Circuit, in Smith v. Brown, said: It is ... true that courts are to construe remedial statutes liberally to effectuate their purposes. … United States, 85 Ct.Cl. 212 , 19 F.Supp. 239 (1937), Brown v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 193 , 54 S.Ct. 356 , 78 L.Ed. 725 (1934), and others).

Timber Products Co. v. United States

103 Fed. Cl. 225 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 29, 2011

Br. 3-4 (citing Baker v. … In Peter Kiewit Sons’ Company v.

Narcorps Specialties, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 11, 2025

Res., Inc. v. United States, 117 Fed. Cl. 54, 65 (2014))); PlanetSpace, Inc. v. United States, 92 Fed. … Similarly, in ViON Corp. v.

Sepehry-Fard v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 30, 2022

See, e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); see also Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“The Court of Federal Claims is a court of limited jurisdiction.”). … United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 887 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (First Amendment); Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 (Fourth Amendment); LeBlanc v. United States, 50 F.3d 1025, 1028 (Fed.

Abramson v. United States

39 Fed. Cl. 290 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 21, 1997

Co. v. … See Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Eng’g Corp., 421 U.S. 168, 184 , 95 S.Ct. 1491, 1500 , 44 L.Ed.2d 57 (1975). Factual information is not subject to the privilege. See Drexel Heritage Furnishings, Inc. v.

Gruszka v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 21, 2023

Kreizenbeck v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 945 F.3d 1362, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (citing Simanski v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 671 F.3d 1368, 1385 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Jay v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993)); Bushnell v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 02-1648V, 2015 WL 4099824, at *12 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. June 12, 2015) (finding that “because Dr.

Ross v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 23, 2021

Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … Brown v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 546, 550 (2006) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1631).” The court has already addressed the first requirement for transfer, finding that it lacks jurisdiction.

Aero Corp., S.A. v. United States

41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,144 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 20, 1997

See Finley v. … Exxon Corp. v. FTC, 589 F.2d 582, 594 (D.C.Cir.1978) (quoting Connecticut v.

O'Connell v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

63 Fed. Cl. 49 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 12, 2004

Prior to petitioner’s discharge, the Navy Physical Evaluation Board rated his disability at twenty percent. Petition 1122 & Exh. W. … (citing Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984)).

Constance Speed v. United States

108 Fed. Cl. 648 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 7, 2013

Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587-88 (1986) (quoting United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962)). … Gutz v. United States, 45 Fed. Cl. 291, 297 (1999); see also City of Tacoma, Dep’t of Pub. Utils. v. United States, 31 F.3d 1130, 1134 (Fed.

Hartford Fire Insurance v. United States

108 Fed. Cl. 525 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 22, 2012

Co. v. … Co. v.

BAYTOS v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 27, 2025

Armour & Co. v. Wantock, 323 U.S. 126, 133 (1944). … IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21, 29-30 (2005) (quoting Steiner v. Mitchell, 350 U.S. 247, 252-53 (1956)).

Estate of Arrowood v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

28 Fed. Cl. 453 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 1993

Petitioner cites McKee v. … McKee involved a judicial review *458 pursuant to standards of the Wunderlich Act of findings by an administrative board under the disputes clause of a construction contract.

Holt v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2015

He acknowledged that this board is not recognized by the American Board of Medical Specialties. Tr. at 231. Much of Dr. … Dobrydnev v. Sec’y, HHS, 566 Fed.Appx. 976, 982-83 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (citing Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 242 (1993)); Fehrs v. United States, 620 F.2d 255, 265 (Ct.

Anchor Savings Bank v. United States

63 Fed. Cl. 199 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 10, 2004

Bank v. … Bank v.

Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 11, 2019

See Asher v. … See Bright v.

Boards v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 20, 2025

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1692V MELINDA BOARDS, … Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)).

Blue & Gold Fleet, LP v. United States

70 Fed. Cl. 487 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 22, 2006

Planning Research Corp. v. … See Bannum, Inc. v.

Ocansey v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 31, 2021

Ocansey asked the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (“AFBCMR” or “the Board”) to change the narrative reason for her discharge ([***]) to instead reflect [***]. Id. at 1. … She does not challenge the Board’s decision to correct her record. See generally id.