Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,911 results
1.97s
Coast-To-Coast Financial Corp. v. United States
45 Fed. Cl. 796 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 19, 2000
Prods., Inc. v. … See Longshore v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 3, 2020
In reviewing the determinations of a military corrections board, a plaintiff must demonstrate “by cogent and clearly convincing evidence,” Wronke v. Marsh, 787 F.2d 1569, 1576 (Fed. … Cir. 1986), that the military board's decision was “arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence, or contrary to law.” Metz v. United States, 466 F.3d 991, 998 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 5, 2021
United States v. Ford Motor Co., 463 F.3d 1267, 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2006); see also, e.g., Novosteel SA v. United States, 284 F.3d 1261, 1274 (Fed. … Mgmt., Inc. v. United States, 564 F.3d 1374, 1380 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHoward W. Heck & Associates, Inc. v. United States
37 Fed. Cl. 245 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 6, 1997
Ltd. v. … United States v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedLindholm v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 15, 2022
Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v. Sec'y Health & Hum. Servs., No. 99-539V, 2005 WL 1026713, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. … Yozawitz spent reviewing the records in this case are reasonable and her hourly rate of $450.00 is also reasonable for someone who is board certified in pediatric neurology.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedTrek Leasing, Inc. v. United States
66 Fed. Cl. 8 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2005
See Kohus v. … It is also uncontested that the color of the lintels is dark brown on Fort Defiance and a light, natural-colored hue at Kayenta.
Cited 11 timesPublished86 Fed. Cl. 681 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 17, 2009
Jones & Brown, Inc. v. W.E. Erickson Constr. Co., 73 Ill.App.3d 481 , 29 Ill.Dec. 414 , 391 N.E.2d 1097 (1979). 2. … Aiken v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRichmond American Homes of Colorado, Inc. v. United States
80 Fed. Cl. 656 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 11, 2008
See e.g., La Van v. … The “Eichleay formula,” was first set forth by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in Ei-chleay Corp., 60-2 B.C.A. H2688, and has since been adopted by the courts.
Cited 5 timesPublishedEstate of Arrowood v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
28 Fed. Cl. 453 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 6, 1993
Petitioner cites McKee v. … McKee involved a judicial review *458 pursuant to standards of the Wunderlich Act of findings by an administrative board under the disputes clause of a construction contract.
Cited 22 timesPublished127 Fed. Cl. 153 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 27, 2016
. $ 1a91(a\2), (b)(2), the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction to award declaratory or injunctive relief Bowen v. Massachusetts, 487 U.S. 879,905 & n.40 (1988); accord Brown v. … .); Lonsdale v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 30, 2021
The date of separation from the “Order and Summary of Conference Call” before the United States Merit Systems Protection Board is listed as November 16, 2018. … Cir. 2008); Alves v. United States, 133 F.3d 1454, 1459 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedKirkham Constructors, Inc. v. United States
39 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,597 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Nov 22, 1993
On February 9, 1993, plaintiff appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “ASBCA”) to direct the Air Force to issue a final decision regarding its claim. … Defendant’s claim that Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLove Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United States
126 Fed. Cl. 389 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 19, 2016
Each air carrier signed a letter agreement and then executed a use agreement with the DFW Airport Board (“DFW Board”) in which it agreed to relocate its services to DFW in conformity with the 1968 Bond Ordinance. … Mitchell Arms, Inc. v. United States, 7 F.3d 212, 215 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hendler v. United States, 952 F.2d 1364, 1374 (Fed. Cir. 1991)). The Takings Clause does not prohibit the taking of property. Brown v.
Reversed on other grounds by Love Terminal Partners, L.P. v. United States, 889 F.3d 1331 (2018)Cited 3 timesPublishedWashington Federal v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 16, 2020
The board of directors of each Enterprise consented to the conservatorship. … . § 4617(a)(3)(I) (permitting the FHFA Director to appoint a conservator when “[t]he [Enterprise], by resolution of its board of directors or its shareholders or members, consents to the appointment”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPratcher v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 30, 2020
Oler * v. … See also Turpin v. Sec'y Health & Human Servs., No. 99- 564V, 2005 WL 1026714, *2 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Feb. 10, 2005) (finding no reasonable basis when petitioner submitted an affidavit and no other records); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 12, 2019
See Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed. Cir. 1997). … United States v. Connolly, 716 F.2d 882, 887 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (noting that the First Amendment is not money-mandating); Brown, 105 F.3d at 623 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
84 Fed. Cl. 408 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Oct 16, 2008
Even the Courts, [sic] But the Courts and the boards have handled them other then [sic] by assuming there is, as Your Honor has used the term, a total breach of contract. … The contracting officer’s final decision may be appealed to this court or, formerly, to an agency Board of Contract Appeals, and now to the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals. 41 U.S.C. § 606 (2000) (board); 41 U.S.C. § 609
Cited 11 timesPublished36 Fed. Cl. 148 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jul 3, 1996
The court in Chavez v. … Landau & Co. v.
Vacated by Timothy A. Janowsky and Peggy J. Janowsky v. United States, 133 F.3d 888 (1998)Cited 6 timesPublishedLurline Gardens Ltd. Housing Partnership v. United States
37 Fed. Cl. 415 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 28, 1997
Martin Marietta Corp., 47 F.3d 1134, 1137 (Fed.Cir.1995); Interwest Constr. v. Brown, 29 F.3d 611, 614 (Fed.Cir.1994). … Corp. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished57 Fed. Cl. 193 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 30, 2003
See Colorado v. United States, 271 U.S. 153, 165 , 46 S.Ct. 452 , 70 L.Ed. 878 (1926); National Ass’n of Reversionary Prop. Owners v. Surface Transp. Bd., 158 F.3d 135, 137 (D.C.Cir.1998); Glosemeyer v. … Toxgon Corp. v. BNFL, Inc., 312 F.3d 1379, 1381 (Fed.Cir.2002); Maher v. United States, 314 F.3d 600, 603 (Fed.Cir.2002).
Cited 33 timesPublished
Ask Donna