Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersuscfc

6,911 results

3.48s

  • Yates v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Sep 18, 2020

    Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 624 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Similarly, the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction “over suits against private parties.” Edelmann v. United States, 76 Fed. Cl. 376, 380 (2007). … (quoting Richardson v. Morris, 409 U.S. 464, 465 (1973) (per curiam))); Brown, 105 F.3d at 624 (“The Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over . . . claims for equitable relief.”). Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Capital Corp. v. United States

    65 Fed. Cl. 241 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 27, 2005

    In United States v. … Greenspan and the Federal Reserve Board of Governors did in terms of moving interest rates down at the time.” TR at 3025.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • 120 Delaware Avenue, LLC v. United States

    95 Fed. Cl. 627 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2010

    . § 1491 (a)(1); Brown v. United States, 105 F.3d 621, 623 (Fed.Cir.1997). … .”); Althaus v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Sarah E. Price v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Feb 10, 2025

    Circuit Judge, Janice Rodgers Brown in her dissent from the majority’s opinion in San Remo Hotel L.P. v. … See Hendler v. United States, 175 F.3d 1374, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 1999). Similar to Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sato v. United States

    33 Fed. Cl. 818 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 14, 1995

    Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 842 , 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984). Skinner v. Brown, 27 F.3d 1571, 1572-73, 1575-76 (Fed.Cir.1994). … In Ishida v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gregory v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 17, 2020

    See Dixon v. United States, 147 Fed. Cl. 469 (2020), appeal docketed, No. 20-1584 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 2, 2020); Hall v. United States, No. 19-463T, 2020 WL 1982877 (Fed. Cl. Apr. 27, 2020); Clark v. … United States, No. 19-713; Murray & Buchanan v. United States, No. 19-1838; Mattson v. United States, No. 19-1113; Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Pelagic Fishing Co. v. United States

    49 Fed. Cl. 36 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 4, 2001

    Plaintiff could not convert the Atlantic Star to any non-fishing use because of the specialized fishing and freezing equipment on board the vessel. … Cont’l Corp. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by American Pelagic Fishing Company, L.P. v. United States, 379 F.3d 1363 (2004)Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jones v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Apr 24, 2025

    Filed Feb. 21, 2023); Jones v. Henderson, No. 1 :23-cv-45 (S.D. Miss. filed Feb. 17, 2023); Jones v. Brown, 1 discharge from the military. See Jones v. … Miss. filed July 18, 2022); Jones v. Mills, No. 2:22-cv-56 (S.D. Miss. filed May 2, 2022); Jones v. Browning, No. 2:19-cv-118 (S.D. Miss filed Aug. 19, 2019); Jones v. Dearman, No. 3:l 7-cv-660 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Jenkins v. United States

    102 Fed. Cl. 598 · United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 20, 2011

    V. … See Toews v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • G4s Secure Solutions (Usa) Inc. v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jan 3, 2020

    Fort Carson Support Servs. v. United States, 71 Fed. Cl. 571, 599 (2006) (quoting Consolidated Eng’g Servs. v. United States, 64 Fed. Cl. 617, 637 (2005)); see also Westech Int’l v. United States, 79 Fed. … See Am-Pro Protective Agency, Inc. v. United States, 281 F.3d 1234, 1239 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Avtel Servs., Inc. v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 173, 189 (2006); ITT Fed. Servs. Corp. v. United States, 45 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 26, 2021

    Van Cleave v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 674, 679 (2006). “When reviewing the decisions of the [reviewing board] under the arbitrary and capricious standard, the scope of review is extremely narrow.” Champagne v. … Heisig v. United 7 States, 719 F.2d 1153, 1157 (Fed. Cir. 1983). The Court does not serve as a “super correction board.” Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Gatto v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Mar 31, 2025

    He is board certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and the American Board of Clinical Neurophysiology. … Holmes is board certified by the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology with Special Competence in Child Neurology, as well as the American Board of Clinical Neurophysiology.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Duke v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 7, 2019

    No. 17-1976V Filed: April 30, 2019 UNPUBLISHED KATHERINE DUKE, Petitioner, v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Monbo v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Dec 19, 2024

    Industrial Supplies, LLC v. United States, 144 Fed. Cl. 290, 293 (2019) (citing Talasila, Inc. v. United States, 240 F.3d 1064, 1066 (Fed. Cir. 2001)); see also Every v. … A claimant may “appeal the decision to an agency board,” such as the CBCA. 41 U.S.C. § 7104(a).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Reynolds Associates v. United States

    31 Fed. Cl. 335 · United States Court of Federal Claims · May 18, 1994

    In Texas v. … Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-04 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1717-18 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), in order to have the force of law. Horner v. Jeffrey, 823 F.2d 1521, 1529 (Fed.Cir.1987).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wirt v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 9, 2014

    Lightfoot is board certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine and the American Board of Internal Medicine in Rheumatology. Id. at 1. He is currently licensed in Kentucky. Id. Dr. … Moberly v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 592 F.3d 1315, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (quoting Shyface v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 165 F.3d 1344, 1352-53 (Fed. Cir. 1999)). In the seminal case of Althen v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gill v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 14, 2019

    No. 17-0280V Filed: May 7, 2019 UNPUBLISHED CHERYL GILL, Petitioner, v. … Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lucero v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · May 19, 2015

    On June 21,1977, the Army Discharge Review Board voted to upgrade plaintiff s discharge to fully honorable. … Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 552 U.S. 130, 133-34 (2008); Martinez v. United State.s, 333 F.3d 1295,1303 (Fed. Cir. 2003)(en banc), cert. denied, 504 U.S. 1177 (2004); Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • City of Fresno v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Jun 6, 2022

    Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587-88 (1986) (quoting United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962)); see Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1391 (Fed. … In light of the severe drought and resulting water shortage in 2014, Reclamation announced across-the- board reductions in allocations, including to both the Exchange Contractors and the Friant Contractors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Payne v. United States

    United States Court of Federal Claims · Aug 22, 2022

    Brestle v. United States, 139 Fed. Cl. 95, 102 n.6 (2018) (collecting cases). 2 Brown v. United States, 88 Fed. … Plaintiff also appears to, at least in part, raise claims that, as of April 22, 2022, lacked a final decision from the Merit Systems Protection Board, see Payne v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.